CTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 2:25 PM
To: Matt
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Seperate Lists?
On Saturday, February 19, 2005, 2:05:09 PM, Matt wrote:
M> Pete,
M> Being guilty of being 'chatty' myself, I still second this id
On Saturday, February 19, 2005, 2:05:09 PM, Matt wrote:
M> Pete,
M> Being guilty of being 'chatty' myself, I still second this idea. I
M> would much prefer to pick through an occasional message dealling with
M> global announcements regarding the service than picking through both
M> discussions a
Pete,
Being guilty of being 'chatty' myself, I still second this idea. I
would much prefer to pick through an occasional message dealling with
global announcements regarding the service than picking through both
discussions as well as announcements. I'm not always up to date on this
list and
On Saturday, February 19, 2005, 1:28:14 PM, Dave wrote:
DK> I am all in favor of a SUPPORT list to announce timely
DK> notifications of problems. solutions and/or changes to your
DK> product or services. However, the threads I"ve been seeing here
DK> lately are 'iMail' specific or involve theoret
Hey Pete. Not to add more burden, but this list has gotten to be quite
"chatty" over the last several days. I see that someone else wanted to be
removed from this list due to the increased traffic.
Remember that not everyone here is an "iMail" user while that is your
roots, you have succe
