Hi Chris Hostetter
Does that mean, that the last two questions I have posted hasn't reached
the mailing list?
Best regards Trym
Den 25-04-2012 19:58, Chris Hostetter skrev:
: Subject: Solr hanging
: References:31fdac6b-c4d9-4383-865d-2faca0f09...@geekychris.com
Hi,
Any more thoughts??
Thanks,
PC Rao.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/EmbeddedSolrServer-and-StreamingUpdateSolrServer-tp3889073p3940383.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
In general -- i would not suggest mixing EmbeddedSolrServer with a
different style (unless the other instances are read only). If you
have multiple instances writing to the same files on disk you are
asking for problems.
Have you tried just using StreamingUpdateSolrServer for daily update?
I
I would suggest debugging with browser requests -- then switching to
Solrj after you are at 1st base.
In particular, try adding the debugQuery=true parameter to the
request and see what solr thinks is happening.
The value that will work for the 'qt' parameter depends on what is
configured in
Am 26.04.2012 00:57, schrieb Joe:
Hi,
I'm using the solrj API to query my SOLR 3.6 index. I have multiple text
fields, which I would like to weight differently. From what I've read, I
should be able to do this using the dismax or edismax query types. I've
tried the following:
SolrQuery query =
Hi Ryan,
I see.
Yes, for incremental indexing(Hourly) we use StreamingUpdateSolrServer
and it is faster than EmbeddedSolrServer.
We are also using, Embedded server for full indexing on a daily basis and
it is efficient for full indexing as it can handle large number of documents
in a better
Trouble getting solr and Haystack working together. I have solar
working (can get admin screen and query test data). I then create my
search_indexes.py (per getting started example, I also have run syndb
and added data to the Notes table). I run manage.py
build_solar_schema, it generates XML
Hi,
We are planning to move the search of one of our listing based portal to
solr/lucene search server from sphinx search server. But we are facing a
challenge is porting customized sorting being used in our portal. We only
have last 60 days of data live.The algorithm is as follows:-
1. Put
Take a look here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin?highlight=%28create%29%7C%28core%29#CREATE
I'm not sure about your partners view. As an alternative to
creating individual cores, you could simply use a single
index and use filter queries (fq) to restrict the
selection to the relevant
Works on my macine (tm). I tried both trunk and 3.6, so I guess that
means we need more details.
What version are you running on? What is your exact URL? Did you
do anything like change the definition without blowing away your
index and re-indexing? Have you tried using Luke or the schema
browser
Please help me understand that.
What wil happen if if have cached data and thay change after comit and i
have autowarm set up.
Old cached data will be still accesible in cache so i will get old data?
That means if autowarm copy all needed data to new cache probably i will
never see new data?
The warmup process reloads the data from the new index.
Cache in Solr expires with a new searcher, correct. You could have
evictions too if it gets filled.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:33 AM, mizayah miza...@gmail.com wrote:
Please help me understand that.
What wil happen if if have cached data
Hello,
I'm thinking about using a Solr index for routing a webapp.
I have pregenerated base urls in my index. E.g.
/foo/bar1
/foo/bar2
/foo/bar3
/foo/bar4
/bar/foo1
/bar/foo2
/bar/foo3
I try to find a way to match /foo/bar3/parameter1/value1/parameter2/value2
without knowing that parameter and
Greetings all!
I have created a enterprise search architecture that includes both nutch for
crawling as well as solr for indexing. I was so focused on the nutch part
that I didn't realized that my user interface (Jquery based) was lacking in
appeal.
One of my issues is the format of the text in
Hi,
Thanks Erick for your response . Actually , the total no of customers is
4500 and every group of customers say 30 is a considered to be a partner or
agent.
The use case is to create a core for each customer as well as partner .
Since its very difficult to create cores statically in
hello,
sorry - i overlooked this message - thanks for checking back and thanks for
the info.
yes - replication seems to be working now:
tailed from logs just now:
2012-04-26 09:21:33,284 INFO [org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller]
(pool-12-thread-1) Slave in sync with master.
2012-04-26
Am 26.04.2012 16:17, schrieb pprabhcisco123:
The use case is to create a core for each customer as well as partner .
Since its very difficult to create cores statically in solr.xml file for all
4500 customers , is there any way to create the cores dynamically or on the
fly.
Yes there is.
Have you tried using mod_rewrite for this?
paul
Le 26 avr. 2012 à 15:16, Björn Zapadlo a écrit :
Hello,
I'm thinking about using a Solr index for routing a webapp.
I have pregenerated base urls in my index. E.g.
/foo/bar1
/foo/bar2
/foo/bar3
/foo/bar4
/bar/foo1
/bar/foo2
Hello all,
i am experimenting with EdgeNGramFilterFactory - on two of the fieldTypes in
my schema.
filter class=solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory minGramSize=3
maxGramSize=15 side=front/
i believe i understand this - but want to verify:
1) will this increase my index time?
2) will increase
Try looking at the logs.
On Apr 25, 2012, at 10:53 PM, BillB1951 wrote:
Trouble getting solr and Haystack working together. I have solar
working (can get admin screen and query test data). I then create my
search_indexes.py (per getting started example, I also have run syndb
and added data
On Apr 24, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Trym R. Møller wrote:
Hi
I experience that a Solr looses its connection with Zookeeper and
re-establish it. After Solr is reconnection to Zookeeper it begins to recover.
It has been missing the connection approximately 10 seconds and meanwhile the
leader
Never mind, I did not notice that this is coming in Solr 4.0. Any
ideas on when Solr 4.0 will be out?
Sohail
It does not appear that any logfiles were created.
-
BillB1951
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-error-after-relacing-schema-xml-tp3940133p3941997.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
By default logging goes to std out. You probably want to configure real logging
though: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrJetty#Logging
On Apr 26, 2012, at 1:33 PM, BillB1951 wrote:
It does not appear that any logfiles were created.
-
BillB1951
--
View this message in context:
On Apr 23, 2012, at 12:10 PM, geeky2 wrote:
http://someip:someport/somepath/somecore/admin/replication/ is not
available. Index fetch failed. Exception: Invalid version (expected 2, but
10) or the data in not in 'javabin' format
This is kind of a bug. When Solr tries to talk in javabin and
On Apr 26, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Sohail Aboobaker wrote:
Any
ideas on when Solr 4.0 will be out?
We are hoping this year. There will be a series of alphas and betas that should
start within a month or few.
- Mark Miller
lucidimagination.com
I'd like to change Lucene's FuzzyConfig prefixLength from it's default
value of 0. Is there a way to configure that via Solr somehow? I've noticed
references on the list to people recompiling lucene from source in order to
change this value, and I'm hoping not to need to resort to the same.
Hi,
Is there a searchable archive for solr user emails available somewhere
to avoid questions already asked on list?
Sohail
Which version of Solr does Haystack expect? The schema builder might
be targeting an older version of Solr.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
By default logging goes to std out. You probably want to configure real
logging though:
: Is there a searchable archive for solr user emails available somewhere
: to avoid questions already asked on list?
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrResources#Mailing_List_Archives
Or just use the search box in the top right corner of the main solr
website...
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/
Can anyone help me out in understand the fix to QueryElevationComponent (in
Solr 4.0) to make it work for distributed search.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/QueryElevationComponent-and-distributed-search-tp3936998p3942221.html
Sent from the Solr - User
Or write your own query component mapping /solr/* in the web.xml, exposing the
request by a thread-local through a filter, and reading this setting the
appropriate query parameters...
Performance-wise, this seems quite reasonable I think.
paul
Le 26 avr. 2012 à 16:58, Paul Libbrecht a écrit
I'm using haystack 2.0.0Beta, and Apache-Solr-3.6.0.
I'm not sure how to determine the schema.xml version, but I do notice that
the solr example's schema.xml is
schema name=example version=1.5- and the schema.xml generated by
haystack is
schema name=default version=1.4. Can I specify
Hi,
I am trying nightly build for solr 4.0. I downloaded the build and am
able to start it. In 3.x, I copied the example directory and updated
the schema.xml. It worked fine but in 4.0, I did the same thing (make
a copy of example) but when I change the schema, I get following:
Apr 26, 2012
I also ran into a problem using 1.6.1 - thats the breaks of progress I
guess ;)
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Gopal Patwa gopalpa...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using Solr4 nightly build apache-solr-4.0-2012-04-26_08-10-58 and I
saw Slf4j version was upgraded to 1.6.4 and it is failing now to
Hi,
I'm wondering if there's any way to use container-based HTTP auth and
Distributed Search configured in the SearchHandler that I haven't
discovered aside from writing my own shard handler implementation.
Thanks,
Michael
On Apr 26, 2012, at 5:25 PM, Michael Della Bitta wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if there's any way to use container-based HTTP auth and
Distributed Search configured in the SearchHandler that I haven't
discovered aside from writing my own shard handler implementation.
Thanks,
Michael
I
Really? Is that in a .properties file somewhere, or would I have to do
it in code?
I was sort of hoping I'd be able to add the credentials to the URL in
the shards field, but looking at the source, that won't fly. While we're
on the topic, it might be nice to be able to specify the connection
Hi,
How about trying grouping with paging?
First you do
group=truegroup.field=advertiserIdgroup.limit=1group.offset=0group.main=truesort=somethinggroup.sort=how-much-paid
desc
That gives you one listing per advertiser, sorted the way you like.
Then to grab the next batch of ads, you go
I'm trying pretty hard to come up with a solution that lets me sort by
per-user scores that I calculate based on my data. Today, I'm trying to use
a combination of ExternalFileField and dynamic fields, where the
presumption is that each user might have their own file full of scores. I
think the
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Phill Tornroth famousactr...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm using Solr 3.5. Does anyone have a suggestion as to how to end up
adding this extra dimension so that I can do per-user relevance? It seems
like an oft-asked, rarely-answered question.
Use a function that make
So, I did just issue:
sort=sub(my_user_score_field,0)+desc
It got me past the error, but still doesn't appear to be actually using the
values to sort. Any ideas as to why?
Phill
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Stephane Bailliez sbaill...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:07 AM,
1 yes. EdgeNGram will inevitably increase the number of tokens in
your index, lengthening your index time. How much? some, but that
means you'll have to try it to see if it's unacceptable. Some people
can't take an increase of 10%. Some can take a 100% increase.
2 No. It will increase the
Yes, stopwords_en.txt. Or go into your schema file and find the
usages of stopwords_en.txt and change it to a stopwords file
in your setup.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Sohail Aboobaker sabooba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying nightly build for solr 4.0. I downloaded the
Hi Solr users
I've implemented the project to compare the performance between
Solr, Elastic Search and SenseiDB
https://github.com/vzhabiuk/search-perf
the Solr version 3.5.0 was used. I've used the default configuration,
just enabled json updates and used the following schema
I believe you can set up certificates. You then store the certificates
in a Java keyring file, and tell Java about the keyring at startup.
Now, when you make an HTTP connection, the HTTP library automatically
uses the certificates. You don't need any custom code in the http
client.
(I think this
46 matches
Mail list logo
