Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2022 18:55:15 +0300
From:Valery Ushakov
Message-ID:
| The test uses __clone(), not clone() and a followup fix made __clone()
| visible under plain _NETBSD_SOURCE again - which is the right thing,
| IMO. So this change is not necessary (the test
On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 15:48:40 +, Robert Elz wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: kre
> Date: Mon Aug 1 15:48:40 UTC 2022
>
> Modified Files:
> src/tests/lib/libc/sys: Makefile
>
> Log Message:
> Provide _GNU_SOURCE for t_clone now that is required to make clone()
> vi
Committed. Thank you for your comment!
rin
On 2020/06/22 20:09, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 22.06.2020 04:51, Rin Okuyama wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: rin
Date: Mon Jun 22 02:51:07 UTC 2020
Modified Files:
src/tests/lib/libc/sys: t_ptrace_signal_wait.h t_ptrace_
On 22.06.2020 04:51, Rin Okuyama wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: rin
> Date: Mon Jun 22 02:51:07 UTC 2020
>
> Modified Files:
> src/tests/lib/libc/sys: t_ptrace_signal_wait.h t_ptrace_wait.h
>
> Log Message:
> Turn trigger_fpe() back to integer division by zero for a whil
On 2020/06/17 17:42, Rin Okuyama wrote:
Now, all *_crash_fpe tests pass for powerpc, and nothing changes for amd64
at least.
Here, powerpc means powerpc/oea, more specifically Mac mini G4.
At the moment, fenv.h doesn't work correctly on booke and ibm4xx, where FPU
is emulated in software. For
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 06:11:21PM +, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: thorpej
> Date: Sat Jun 6 18:11:21 UTC 2020
>
> Modified Files:
> src/tests/lib/libc/sys: t_lwp_create.c
>
> Log Message:
> Add a test case to ensure that _lwp_create() fails with t
On 15.05.2020 00:43, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 23:36:28 +0200
>> From: Kamil Rytarowski
>>
>> If a signal would not reach the child process (as it is ignored or
>> masked+SA_IGNOREd) and it is not a crash signal, it is dropped. As I
>> checked, it's the design in UNIX to o
> Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 23:36:28 +0200
> From: Kamil Rytarowski
>
> If a signal would not reach the child process (as it is ignored or
> masked+SA_IGNOREd) and it is not a crash signal, it is dropped. As I
> checked, it's the design in UNIX to overlook SIGCHLD signals in UNIX.
> Race free signal
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:36:28PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 14.05.2020 23:02, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 07:21:35PM +, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> >> Module Name: src
> >> Committed By: kamil
> >> Date: Thu May 14 19:21:35 UTC 2020
> >
On 14.05.2020 23:02, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 07:21:35PM +, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:kamil
>> Date:Thu May 14 19:21:35 UTC 2020
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/tests/lib/libc/sys: t_ptrace_fork_wait.h
>>
>>
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 07:21:35PM +, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: kamil
> Date: Thu May 14 19:21:35 UTC 2020
>
> Modified Files:
> src/tests/lib/libc/sys: t_ptrace_fork_wait.h
>
> Log Message:
> Ignore interception of the SIGCHLD signals.
>
> SIG
Date:Mon, 11 May 2020 13:47:45 +0200
From:Kamil Rytarowski
Message-ID: <54178983-82d1-df3d-fd54-549a6c73f...@gmx.com>
| The only purpose of the test is to check whether misaligned program
| counter can crash the kernel (it can for NetBSD/sparc). Later, if a
| pr
On 11.05.2020 13:35, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date:Mon, 11 May 2020 11:03:15 +
> From:"Kamil Rytarowski"
> Message-ID: <2020050315.54b13f...@cvs.netbsd.org>
>
> | Do not fail when trying to kill a dying process
> |
> | A dying process can disappear for a whil
Date:Mon, 11 May 2020 11:03:15 +
From:"Kamil Rytarowski"
Message-ID: <2020050315.54b13f...@cvs.netbsd.org>
| Do not fail when trying to kill a dying process
|
| A dying process can disappear for a while. Rather than aborting, retry
| sending SIGKILL to
On 24.04.2020 05:25, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: thorpej
> Date: Fri Apr 24 03:25:20 UTC 2020
>
> Modified Files:
> src/tests/lib/libc/sys: t_ptrace_wait.c t_ptrace_x86_wait.h
>
> Log Message:
> Update for new LWP behavior -- as of 9.99.59, the LWP ID o
In article <5e528f7a-147a-23e7-46da-6b02d76e5...@gmx.com>,
Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>On 07.03.2020 15:53, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:christos
>> Date:Sat Mar 7 14:53:14 UTC 2020
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/
On 07.03.2020 15:53, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: christos
> Date: Sat Mar 7 14:53:14 UTC 2020
>
> Modified Files:
> src/tests/lib/libc/sys: t_ptrace_wait.c t_ptrace_wait.h
>
> Log Message:
> Try to fix the build. This is why all those inlines should r
On 18.02.2020 16:57, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20200213152742.081a9f...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
> MichaŠGórny wrote:
>> -=-=-=-=-=-
>>
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:mgorny
>> Date:Thu Feb 13 15:27:41 UTC 2020
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/tests/lib/libc/sy
In article <20200213152742.081a9f...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
MichaŠGórny wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Module Name: src
>Committed By: mgorny
>Date: Thu Feb 13 15:27:41 UTC 2020
>
>Modified Files:
> src/tests/lib/libc/sys: t_ptrace_wait.c
>
>Log Message:
>Enable combined breakpoint, watchp
In article <20200213114904.ga30...@bec.de>,
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:50:19AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 09:53:46PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> > Module Name: src
>> > Committed By: christos
>> > Date: Thu F
In article <20200213095019.ga28...@bec.de>,
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 09:53:46PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:christos
>> Date:Thu Feb 13 02:53:46 UTC 2020
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/tests/lib/libc/sys:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:50:19AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 09:53:46PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: christos
> > Date: Thu Feb 13 02:53:46 UTC 2020
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/tests/lib/lib
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 09:53:46PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: christos
> Date: Thu Feb 13 02:53:46 UTC 2020
>
> Modified Files:
> src/tests/lib/libc/sys: t_ptrace_x86_wait.h
>
> Log Message:
> Turn off optimization on a function which contains
On 01.07.2019 14:59, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date:Mon, 1 Jul 2019 11:55:57 +0200
> From:Joerg Sonnenberger
> Message-ID: <20190701095557.ga55...@bec.de>
>
> | On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:04:38AM +, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>
> | > Cast note_hdr.n_namesz to ssize_t
Date:Mon, 1 Jul 2019 11:55:57 +0200
From:Joerg Sonnenberger
Message-ID: <20190701095557.ga55...@bec.de>
| On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:04:38AM +, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
| > Cast note_hdr.n_namesz to ssize_t through size_t to avoid potential
| > signedness bi
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:04:38AM +, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: kamil
> Date: Mon Jul 1 02:04:38 UTC 2019
>
> Modified Files:
> src/tests/lib/libc/sys: t_ptrace_wait.c
>
> Log Message:
> Avoid GCC warning on NetBSD/i386
>
> Cast note_hdr.n_nam
> On May 24, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>
> Fixed!
Confirmed! Thanks!
-- thorpej
On 24.05.2018 06:17, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> This change seems to have broken building on 32-bit platforms (certainly at
> least for 32-bit ARM):
>
> # compile sys/t_ptrace_wait.o
> /nbsd/tools/bin/armv6--netbsdelf-eabihf-gcc -O2 -std=gnu99-Wall
> -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
This change seems to have broken building on 32-bit platforms (certainly at
least for 32-bit ARM):
# compile sys/t_ptrace_wait.o
/nbsd/tools/bin/armv6--netbsdelf-eabihf-gcc -O2 -std=gnu99-Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-sign-compare
-Wsystem-headers
On 27.02.2018 12:48, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:15:53 +, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:kamil
>> Date:Tue Feb 27 11:15:53 UTC 2018
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/tests/lib/libc/sys: t_ucontext.c
>>
>> Log Message
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:15:53 +, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: kamil
> Date: Tue Feb 27 11:15:53 UTC 2018
>
> Modified Files:
> src/tests/lib/libc/sys: t_ucontext.c
>
> Log Message:
> Make the t_ucontext.c test more portable
>
> Cast _UC_MACHIN
help
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Christos Zoulas
wrote:
> Module Name:src
> Committed By: christos
> Date: Tue May 23 16:01:46 UTC 2017
>
> Modified Files:
> src/tests/lib/libc/sys: t_mincore.c
>
> Log Message:
> Add the error in syscall failure.
>
>
> To generate a
Module Name:src
Committed By: martin
Date: Fri Mar 24 08:18:27 UTC 2017
Modified Files:
src/tests/lib/libc/sys: t_mprotect.c
Log Message:
Do not toggle global security.pax.mprotect state in an attempt to
activate it for the current process. It does not work and tests shou
Should address PR bin/51869
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017, Paul Goyette wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: pgoyette
Date: Sat Jan 14 03:59:58 UTC 2017
Modified Files:
src/tests/lib/libc/sys: Makefile
Log Message:
Set FILESBUILD=yes to actually run the creation script for the f
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2016 12:02:44 +
From:"Robert Elz"
Message-ID: <20160809120244.9f9d0f...@cvs.netbsd.org>
Ignore this part ...
| Note that NetBSD mlock(2) talks about EINVAL for cases where the length
| parameter is negative ... but that is a size_t - good luck
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 12:19:08AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 11:03:23PM +, David Laight wrote:
> > Should the 'no timeout' case (try to) check that the elapsed time is
> > less than one tick?
>
> I gave the (partly virtual) test platforms a bit more slope and made
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 11:03:23PM +, David Laight wrote:
> Should the 'no timeout' case (try to) check that the elapsed time is
> less than one tick?
I gave the (partly virtual) test platforms a bit more slope and made it < 1s
instead of 1 tick, but otherwise: yes.
Martin
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 05:01:54PM +, Martin Husemann wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: martin
> Date: Fri Mar 8 17:01:54 UTC 2013
>
> Modified Files:
> src/tests/lib/libc/sys: Makefile
> Added Files:
> src/tests/lib/libc/sys: t_sigtimedwait.c
> Removed Files:
>
On Sep 8, 4:32pm, mar...@duskware.de (Martin Husemann) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/lib/libc/sys
| On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 02:28:53PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > Why not add a test for == VM_MIN_ADDRESS too?
|
| If this is != NULL, we can not rely on it not to be map
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 02:28:53PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Why not add a test for == VM_MIN_ADDRESS too?
If this is != NULL, we can not rely on it not to be mapped, so I don't
see any additional value in that case. The brk+1 page test should be good
enough.
Martin
In article <20120908122506.92aa117...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
Martin Husemann wrote:
>Module Name: src
>Committed By: martin
>Date: Sat Sep 8 12:25:06 UTC 2012
>
>Modified Files:
> src/tests/lib/libc/sys: t_mlock.c
>
>Log Message:
>Make this compile on archs where VM_MIN_ADDRESS is not
41 matches
Mail list logo