gt; =Drummond
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dick Hardt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 2:21 PM
> To: Drummond Reed
> Cc: 'Josh Hoyt'; specs@openid.net
> Subject: Re: Delegation Proposal Amendment
>
> Drummond
>
> How does the
ROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 2:21 PM
To: Drummond Reed
Cc: 'Josh Hoyt'; specs@openid.net
Subject: Re: Delegation Proposal Amendment
Drummond
How does the RP get a persistent identifier before it has called the
IdP? The user could type anything into the form.
-- Dick
On 6-Oct
Drummond
How does the RP get a persistent identifier before it has called the
IdP? The user could type anything into the form.
-- Dick
On 6-Oct-06, at 2:22 PM, Drummond Reed wrote:
> Josh,
>
> This is very cool. Adding openid.rp_user_id would give us an
> unambigous way
> to represent what
> Do you mean literal Unix-style diffs or a human-readable set
> of changes to section numbers?
I'd personally prefer the former, but I would settle for the
latter.
___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
Josh,
This is very cool. Adding openid.rp_user_id would give us an unambigous way
to represent what I called the RPI in my earlier message:
IPI = IdP-Persistent-Identifier = openid.identity
RPI = RP-Persistent-Identifier = openid.rp_user_id
It doesn't address the third identifier, which I calle
On 10/6/06, Granqvist, Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you propose this in terms of diffs to the current draft so
> it is glaringly obvious what the proposal means?
Sure.
> Also, I think this "diffs to current draft" can be most useful
> for all proposals as it cuts through the various sema
> ...
> Revised Proposal
>
>
> As it stands, "openid.identity" is the identifier by which
> the IdP knows the user. There is no parameter by which the RP
> knows the user.
>
> I propose to add a field called "openid.rp_user_id" in
> "checkid_*" and "id_res" that defaults to "o
