Chiming in on SR-MPLS and SRv6 feature parity discussion.
SRv6 and SR-MPLS serve as future MPLS replacement options for operators.
The architecture of both technologies are completely different as to how
they operate.
>From a timeline historical perspective we had atm and frame relay followed
by
Hi,
Support.
Thanks,
Francois
Le 3 janv. 2020 à 03:01, Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) a
écrit :
Happy New Year.
I support.
Thanks,
Pablo.
From: spring on behalf of "bruno.decra...@orange.com"
Date: Thursday, 19 December 2019 at 17:54
To: SPRING WG
Subject: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6
Dear WG and Chairs,
I support this early allocation
Thanks
Regards … Zafar
From: spring on behalf of "bruno.decra...@orange.com"
Date: Thursday, December 19, 2019 at 11:55 AM
To: SPRING WG
Subject: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early
Allocation Call
Hi SPRI
I support this early allocation.
Thanks,
Shunwan
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 12:54 AM
To: SPRING WG
Subject: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early
Allocation Call
Hi SPRING W
I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this document.
thanks,
Arthi Ayyangar
From: bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 8:50 AM
To: 'SPRING WG List' ;
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
Subject: IPR poll for draft-ietf-sp
Support.
thanks,
Jingrong
From:bruno.decraene
To:SPRING WG
Date:2019-12-20 00:54:44
Subject:[spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early
Allocation Call
Hi SPRING WG,
This begins a 2 week Early Allocation call for a “Ethernet” value from the
"Protocol Numbers" regis
Hi Rakesh,
The request has been recorded in the wiki.
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/spring/wiki/WikiStart
Best regards,
Shuping
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rakesh Gandhi
Sent: Friday, January 3, 2020 3:58 AM
To: bruno.decra...@orange.com
Cc: SPRING WG List
Subject: R
Hi Chairs, all,
I support this early allocation.
I agree that the criteria for the early allocation of this code point are met,
and there are already multiple deployments worldwide.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status-04
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ti
Hi Robert,
Three responses:
A)
What prevents SR-MPLS from evolving along the same path as SRv6?
B)
The uSID proposal introduces its own set of deployment issues, which have been
discussed in depth on this list as well as on 6man.
C)
Could you be a little more specific about the failure scen
Hi Chairs, WG,
The draft was presented at the last IETF meeting and there was a good
support in the session for WG adoption. We like to formally request WG
adoption for this draft:
draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm
Thanks,
Rakesh
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 11:58 AM wrote:
> Hi SPRING,
>
>
>
> A nu
Happy New Year.
I support.
Thanks,
Pablo.
From: spring on behalf of "bruno.decra...@orange.com"
Date: Thursday, 19 December 2019 at 17:54
To: SPRING WG
Subject: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early
Allocation Call
Hi SPRING WG,
This begins a 2 week Early A
11 matches
Mail list logo