On 08/14/2013 04:23 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> IIRC, there is %>lp but no %>lp_name macro yet. We should add it.
>
>
> The same changes should apply to the url_rewrite_program helper.
+1 for this specific idea.
Eliezer
>
>
> HTH,
>
> Alex.
On 08/14/2013 01:54 AM, Henrik Nordström wrote:
> tis 2013-08-13 klockan 16:01 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov:
>>
>>> the urltag approach used in squid-2 could be used here as general
>>> mechanism. It allows http_port or external_acl to add a piece to the
>>> object key.
>>>
>>> This allows splitting
tis 2013-08-13 klockan 16:01 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov:
>
> > the urltag approach used in squid-2 could be used here as general
> > mechanism. It allows http_port or external_acl to add a piece to the
> > object key.
> >
> > This allows splitting cache based on
> > - port received on
> > - usern
On 08/07/2013 01:23 AM, Henrik Nordström wrote:
> ons 2013-08-07 klockan 16:51 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries:
>
>> My previous thoughts around this have all revolved around the idea of
>> adding the clients IP address to the cache key when private proxy mode
>> is enabled. This has a major issue tho
ons 2013-08-07 klockan 16:51 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries:
> My previous thoughts around this have all revolved around the idea of
> adding the clients IP address to the cache key when private proxy mode
> is enabled. This has a major issue though in that it does not solve
> anything for users wit
As the subject says I am looking at what is necessary to implement a
"private cache" mode for Squid.
Goal:
removing ignore-private option from refresh_pattern. It is completely
unsafe in shared-cache traffic and real private caches should not need
to specify it on every refresh_pattern line.