Hudson build is back to normal: 2.HEAD-amd64-CentOS-5.3 #4

See

Hudson build is back to normal: 2.HEAD-i386-FreeBSD-6.4 #2

See

Hudson build is back to normal: 2.HEAD-i386-Debian-sid #2

See

Re: assertion: new_mem_lo > 0

ons 2009-08-19 klockan 16:15 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: > Henrik, this is the new memory-promotion patch dying. Does not look like the patch, but I will look into it regardless. My first reaction is "Why is that assert there?". May well be the case that it should not be asserted. Regards Henrik

Re: assertion: new_mem_lo > 0

ons 2009-08-19 klockan 19:20 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordstrom: > ons 2009-08-19 klockan 16:15 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: > > Henrik, this is the new memory-promotion patch dying. > > Does not look like the patch, but I will look into it regardless. In fact it was... For some reason I tried to optimiz

RFC: infrastructure product in bugzilla

I think we should have an infrastructure product in bugzilla, for tracking list/server/buildfarm etc issues. -Rob -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFC: infrastructure product in bugzilla

On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:00:15 +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > I think we should have an infrastructure product in bugzilla, for > tracking list/server/buildfarm etc issues. > What sort of extra issues exactly are you thinking need to be bug-tracked? We already have websites as a separate 'product

Re: RFC: infrastructure product in bugzilla

On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:33 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:00:15 +1000, Robert Collins > wrote: > > I think we should have an infrastructure product in bugzilla, for > > tracking list/server/buildfarm etc issues. > > > > What sort of extra issues exactly are you thinking ne

Build failed in Hudson: 3.HEAD-i386-OpenBSD-4.5 #1

See -- Started by user admin Building remotely on vobsd ERROR: Failed to clone http://www.squid-cache.org/bzr/squid3/trunk/