Related
[description](https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2013-August/079386.html)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1215#issuecomment-348866268
Thank you vary math Daniel @miconda
Using your table recommendation calls now goes correct.
Respect.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1215#issuecomment-323102174
Closed #1215.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1215#event-1208483297___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@l
For what so ever reason, the sngrep does not show all the packets, using a bare
ngrep shows more.
Anyhow, the problem is the caller device or the proxy/alg in between.
By RFC, the R-URI in ACK (and the other requests within dialog) has to be the
URI from the Contact of 200ok. But there is the a
Not understand
1) packet 1 - kamailio received INVITE from carrier
2) packet 3 - kamailio send this INVITE to PBX
3) packet 5 - kamailio received from PBX ringing message
4) packet 6 - kamailio send this Ringing message to carrier
At PBX call is answered by IVR, bleg SIP device does not exists.
If you refer the zip from first comment, that has only one side of the call.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1215#issuecomment-322572448_
Daniel pcap in file full-call.zip.
This file also contains kamailio log
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1215#issuecomment-322570724__
@sergey-safarov I need the pcap file so I investigate it here. A wireshark
screenshot is not that useful.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1215#issuecomment-32253113
according this code
[here](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/modules/rr/loose.c#L607-L625)
and
[here](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/modules/rr/loose.c#L798-L818)
second `Route` is removed if second present in same header.
But second `Route` may be prese
Hello Daniel
Kamailio listend IP:
1) eth1 - 172.18.0.7 advertised as 199.180.30.245;
2) eth0 - 10.0.9.21;
VoIP PBX have IP address 10.0.9.19
http://prntscr.com/g87p2a
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://
The pcap has only one side of the call. We need incoming as well as outgoing
traffic (what is received by kamailio and what is sent out). Tell also what are
the IPs on which Kamailio is listening in order to match then with the headers.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to th
### Description
When kamailio need to pass call from carrier to customer VoIP PBX in docker
container on swarm cluster then it not possible.
Network interconnection.
In docker environment eth1 NIC of kamailio and VoIP PBX connected to internet
via iptables masquerading. eth1 NIC of kamailio and
12 matches
Mail list logo