On (20/04/16 19:52), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (20/04/16 08:41), Petr Cech wrote:
>>On 04/19/2016 01:55 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I found a strange condition in the function sss_ncache_check_str().
>>>
>>> This condition causes the cache is NOT checked and the result of
>>> checking i
On (20/04/16 08:41), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 04/19/2016 01:55 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I found a strange condition in the function sss_ncache_check_str().
>>
>> This condition causes the cache is NOT checked and the result of
>> checking is automatically EEXIST.
>>
>> I dind't find call of
On 04/19/2016 01:55 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I found a strange condition in the function sss_ncache_check_str().
This condition causes the cache is NOT checked and the result of
checking is automatically EEXIST.
I dind't find call of sss_ncache_check_str() with ttl = -1, except in
tests.
Note
On 04/19/2016 02:07 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (19/04/16 13:55), Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I found a strange condition in the function sss_ncache_check_str().
This condition causes the cache is NOT checked and the result of checking is
automatically EEXIST.
I dind't find call of sss_ncache_chec
On (19/04/16 13:55), Petr Cech wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I found a strange condition in the function sss_ncache_check_str().
>
>This condition causes the cache is NOT checked and the result of checking is
>automatically EEXIST.
>
>I dind't find call of sss_ncache_check_str() with ttl = -1, except in tests.
>