Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: sugar-jhbuild

2009-01-20 Thread Bill Kerr
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:43 AM, David Farning wrote: > Tony, > > As far as running Jhbuild, I would look at > http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Jhbuild It is quite a bit more > up to date then the resources you are looking at. > > Have you seen the work that the Sugar on a Stick people are

[Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Hello, I spent some time trying to get Sugar on a stick images (which are basically livecd-tools based Fedora spins) running on the XO from nand. Converting the image to jffs2 and adding cafe_nand and jffs2 to the initrd was enough to make it boot. I have two weird problems: 1 haldaemon fails to

[Sugar-devel] sugar-jhbuild in Gitorious

2009-01-20 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Ciao, I finally tracked down and fixed the reason why the sugar-jhbuild project was causing Gitorious to die with a 500 Internal Server Error. There were 2 records in table committerships referring to user_id=53, which did not exist. This would make the template engine blow up with an exception

Re: [Sugar-devel] Extensive jhbuild refactoring landed

2009-01-20 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 21.01.2009, at 02:31, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > Hello, > > I landed David work on jhbuild. Please do a clean build and report any > issue you run into. David, I guess we should remove the slo-buildbot > repository to avoid confusion and switch the buildbot to use > sugar-jhbuild. David r

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-20 Thread Gary C Martin
On 21 Jan 2009, at 00:18, Simon Schampijer wrote: > Gary C Martin wrote: >> On 17 Jan 2009, at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe >>> wrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: > Issues: We do not have a don't sav

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
Gary C Martin wrote: > On 17 Jan 2009, at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe >> wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: >>> Issues: We do not have a don't save those changes option. If you resume by def

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: sugar-jhbuild

2009-01-20 Thread David Farning
Tony, As far as running Jhbuild, I would look at http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Jhbuild It is quite a bit more up to date then the resources you are looking at. Have you seen the work that the Sugar on a Stick people are doing at http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick ? It is basicall

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 06:24:48PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote: >Hi, > > >> I prefer to look at it pragmatically. Until there is some kind of > >> dependency handling for .xo packages, this is the difference > >> between a child at an existing depl

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Nirav Patel
Indeed. To bring things back to Pippy, Box2D and pyBox2D are both licensed zlib. Fulfilling the terms of the license is a simple as including http://code.google.com/p/pybox2d/source/browse/trunk/LICENSE somewhere in the .xo. Unfortunately, it seems none of the Activities using PyBox2D are curren

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, > If the license *requires* us to include the source code to the > compiled module (is a link sufficient??) in the activity bundle, I > guess we have to do that too. Yes, a link is sufficient. This is mostly a non-issue; it's just something we have to handle properly (with a written

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, >> I prefer to look at it pragmatically. Until there is some kind of >> dependency handling for .xo packages, this is the difference >> between a child at an existing deployment being able to browse to >> the wiki, download an activity, and use it, or not being able to. > It's

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Wade Brainerd
It's important to separate the pragmatism from the license concern. I fully support the pragmatism of shipping libraries with activities as a temporary solution, if that's what is needed to make the activity work. If the license *requires* us to include the source code to the compiled module (is a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Luke Faraone
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Nirav Patel wrote: > I prefer to look at it pragmatically. Until there is some kind of > dependency handling for .xo packages, this is the difference between a > child at an existing deployment being able to browse to the wiki, > download an activity, and use it,

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: sugar-jhbuild

2009-01-20 Thread Walter Bender
Forwarding to list -walter -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:27 PM Subject: sugar-jhbuild To: walter.ben...@gmail.com Cc: pau...@gmail.com, rgesthui...@gmail.com, costello.ro...@edumail.vic.gov.au, billk...@gmail.com, joel.s...@gmail.com Walter, I wa

[Sugar-devel] Summary and minutes from Pia's first Deployment Meeting.

2009-01-20 Thread Michael Stone
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Deployment_meetings/20090120#Summary http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Deployment_meetings/20090120 Enjoy, and please consider joining us later today/tomorrow at 0800 UTC (0300 in Boston) in #olpc-deployment on irc.freenode.net to discuss the questions and comments raised in to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Nirav Patel
I prefer to look at it pragmatically. Until there is some kind of dependency handling for .xo packages, this is the difference between a child at an existing deployment being able to browse to the wiki, download an activity, and use it, or not being able to. Nirav On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:03 PM

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Log v14

2009-01-20 Thread Wade Brainerd
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Log/Log-14.tar.bz2 == News == * New translations from Pootle. Wade PS- The above link does not work yet, I believe some synchronization step has yet to happen between the upload and download servers. __

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Luke Faraone
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:10:11PM -0500, Nirav Patel wrote: > >PyBox2D is included locally in the activity, just as it is in Physics, > >x2o, Bridge, and other Activities that use physi

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:10:11PM -0500, Nirav Patel wrote: >PyBox2D is included locally in the activity, just as it is in Physics, >x2o, Bridge, and other Activities that use physics. Though, that is >~2.5mB of duplicated libraries for each. ...w

Re: [Sugar-devel] Extensive jhbuild refactoring landed

2009-01-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 7:38 PM, David Farning wrote: > slo-buildbot is removed. > It will take a couple for the change to propagate through the buildbot network > > Can you also remove sugar-buildbot from git.sl.org? I'll make it deprecated, would like to keep the sources around... Marco __

Re: [Sugar-devel] Extensive jhbuild refactoring landed

2009-01-20 Thread David Farning
slo-buildbot is removed. It will take a couple for the change to propagate through the buildbot network Can you also remove sugar-buildbot from git.sl.org? david On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > Hello, > > I landed David work on jhbuild. Please do a clean build an

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-20 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:48:57PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:40:46PM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote: > >> On Ubuntu we're not supporting jhbuild on hardy any more, due to newer >> dependencies that are only in Intrepid. > Thanks for the info. Would be nice if there were a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Nirav Patel
PyBox2D is included locally in the activity, just as it is in Physics, x2o, Bridge, and other Activities that use physics. Though, that is ~2.5mB of duplicated libraries for each. Nirav On 1/20/09, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, Jan 20, 200

[Sugar-devel] Extensive jhbuild refactoring landed

2009-01-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Hello, I landed David work on jhbuild. Please do a clean build and report any issue you run into. David, I guess we should remove the slo-buildbot repository to avoid confusion and switch the buildbot to use sugar-jhbuild. Marco ___ Sugar-devel mailing

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-20 Thread David Farning
Sascha, The best person for this type of information would be alsroot (Alesksey Lim). He has been doing a lot of good work porting Sugar to different distributions. His jhconvert work also seems interesting:) david On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 a

[Sugar-devel] Hulahop moved to git.sugarlabs.org

2009-01-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
No pootle changes necessary for this module. Marco ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Olpc-open] Basic Maths?

2009-01-20 Thread Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
Rafael Ortiz -- Forwarded message -- From: Tom Stewart Date: Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:42 AM Subject: [Olpc-open] Basic Maths? To: olpc-open There is a Basic Math Game activity listed on the Math portal page (http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Math), but when I download it to my XO, and

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:27:08PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: >the Sucrose package of Pippy is version 25 - when I last released it >back in August. Since then there has been some development going into >Pippy (now version 30) >http://dev.laptop

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Write 61

2009-01-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:26:54AM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: >* Make use of the ColorToolButton that benzea landed in sugar-toolkit Activities are supposed to be backwards compatible, right? So above fails gracefully if ColorToolButton is not fo

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sucrose Downloads not synced (was Re: [RELEASE] Browse-103)

2009-01-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 09:30:17AM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: >Simon Schampijer wrote: >> Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:16:02PM +, Simon Schampijer wrote: == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sourc

[Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, the Sucrose package of Pippy is version 25 - when I last released it back in August. Since then there has been some development going into Pippy (now version 30) http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=projects/pippy-activity;a=shortlog But none of the maintainers did follow the Sucrose release cycle,

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Write 61

2009-01-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Write/Write-61.tar.bz2 == News == * Make use of the ColorToolButton that benzea landed in sugar-toolkit * #3060 Filter object chooser so it shows only images * #8972 Save to OpenDocument if we cannot export in the original forma

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-103

2009-01-20 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:08, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:16:02PM +, Simon Schampijer wrote: >>== Source == >> >>http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-103.tar.bz2 > > Hmm. Only Browse 1

Re: [Sugar-devel] Auto-installing bundles (was [RELEASE] sugar-0.83.5)

2009-01-20 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 00:23, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > > On 20.01.2009, at 08:02, Simon Schampijer wrote: > >> * #165 Install bundles when they get into the journal > > Does that mean any xo bundle an activity saves is automatically and > immediately installed? Yeah, though this has been like t

Re: [Sugar-devel] one more mind mapping activity

2009-01-20 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Oi Gabriel, On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 23:25, Gabriel Eirea wrote: > Hi Tomeu, > > This is great. I wanted to check out the code but was unable to. I > tried the following: > > $ git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/mindmap > > and I get the error: > > Initialized empty Git repository in > /ho

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sucrose Downloads not synced (was Re: [RELEASE] Browse-103)

2009-01-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
Simon Schampijer wrote: > Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:16:02PM +, Simon Schampijer wrote: >>> == Source == >>> >>> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-103.tar.bz2 >> Hmm. Only Browse

[Sugar-devel] Sucrose Downloads not synced (was Re: [RELEASE] Browse-103)

2009-01-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:16:02PM +, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> == Source == >> >> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-103.tar.bz2 > > Hmm. Only Browse 102 is available there curren