Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Moon-10

On 14 Mar 2009, at 02:19, Ton van Overbeek wrote: > Gary, > > When running on small screens (800x600) the text on the left hand > side does not fit, but there is no scroll bar. > The moon image scales fine. > > I get the 800x600 screen when running a SoaS2 snapshot iso in VMware > Player > on Wi

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Moon-10

Gary, When running on small screens (800x600) the text on the left hand side does not fit, but there is no scroll bar. The moon image scales fine. I get the 800x600 screen when running a SoaS2 snapshot iso in VMware Player on Windows. Ton van Overbeek

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Moon-10

== .XO Bundle == http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4034 http://wiki.laptop.org/images/0/0e/Moon-10.xo ...or use the Software Update panel. == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/Moon/Moon-10.tar.bz2 == Git == http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/moon == Features

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS-2] Another Snapshot!

t; Hi folks, >> >> there's another new - though, completely untested - snapshot of >> soas-2 >> ready and waiting for you here: >> >> http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/Soas2-200903131725.iso >> >> A log file from the build

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS-2] Another Snapshot!

file from the build process has been posted, too: > > http://shell.sugarlabs.org/sdz/soas2-20090313.log > > So what is new? > > * most activities have been updated to their latest version > * sugar-update-control is now included - thanks to SMParrish > * etoys, speak and read act

Re: [Sugar-devel] announce: alternate power management

david wrote: > Very cool! > > How well will this integrate with the power management systems other > distros are using? Can it become a 'Value Added' for other netbook > manufacturers? while i'd love to say i did a lot of research and prep in order to make sure my little project was api com

Re: [Sugar-devel] Priorities and Ideas (for GSoC)

> > My fourth priority is other educational activities. There are > hundreds > of > good > ideas

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Priorities and Ideas (for GSoC)

Hey Jameson, Mel Thanks for _proving_ me wrong. I had originally thought that Sugar Labs would only have the resources to handle two mentors/students this summers with out getting bogged down. It now looks like you have got a great handle on the project. david On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:49 PM,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Priorities and Ideas (for GSoC)

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 3:19 AM, Jameson Quinn wrote: > I will link to this thread (in IAEP) on the GSoC project ideas page. This > page is the primary location where prospective GSoC students will come to > learn about out project, and so I want them to get a feel for our community > discussion o

[Sugar-devel] Priorities and Ideas (for GSoC)

I will link to this thread (in IAEP) on the GSoC project ideaspage. This page is the primary location where prospective GSoC students will come to learn about out project, and so I want them to get a feel for our community discussion of prioriti

Re: [Sugar-devel] announce: alternate power management

Very cool! How well will this integrate with the power management systems other distros are using? Can it become a 'Value Added' for other netbook manufacturers? david On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:33 PM, wrote: > hi -- > > i had an itch that needed scratching, and the result is a > reimplementat

Re: [Sugar-devel] soc ideas

I think that might be referring to the new toolbar designs. See http://sugarlabs.org/go/DesignTeam/Designs/Toolbars for some screenshots. You can also get some more background about the pros and cons, and logic for the design by listening to my short talk on it: http://download.laptop.org/content

[Sugar-devel] announce: alternate power management

hi -- i had an itch that needed scratching, and the result is a reimplementation of much (but not all) of what ohmd does currently. i've thought for some time (and i believe cjb agrees) that ohmd is needlessly difficult to maintain and modify for our purposes on the XO. small improvements are di

[Sugar-devel] soc ideas

I saw this thing in the project ideas for soc, Sugar Toolbar submenu support ,could anyone elaborate on this thing? ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS-2] Another Snapshot!

garlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/Soas2-200903131725.iso > > A log file from the build process has been posted, too: > > http://shell.sugarlabs.org/sdz/soas2-20090313.log > > So what is new? > > * most activities have been updated to their latest version > * sugar-update-

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Olpc-open] justin.tv on the XO

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Luke Faraone wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Brian Jordan wrote: > Curious before I try it out...not sure if Browse will be allowed

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Olpc-open] justin.tv on the XO

On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Luke Faraone wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Brian Jordan wrote: >>> >>> > Curious before I try it out...not sure if Browse will be allowed to >>> > take over the camera and the mic. >>> >>> Whether

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Versioning (Was Re: [RELEASE] Terminal v24)

One project to look for on how to handle activity versions is eclipse. The notion of the eclipse plug-in ecosystem is virtually the same as it is in Sugar Labs. Eclipse has a few years of struggling with this issue under their belt. http://www.eclipse.org/equinox/documents/plugin-versioning.html

[Sugar-devel] [SoaS-2] Another Snapshot!

Hi folks, there's another new - though, completely untested - snapshot of soas-2 ready and waiting for you here: http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/Soas2-200903131725.iso A log file from the build process has been posted, too: http://shell.sugarlabs.org/sdz/soas2-20090313.lo

Re: [Sugar-devel] source code

vishak baby wrote: > Hi everyone,from where can I download the complete source code of sugar and > all the sugar activities? Either use git: http://git.sugarlabs.org or the tarballs: http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/ Regards, Simon ___

[Sugar-devel] source code

Hi everyone,from where can I download the complete source code of sugar and all the sugar activities? ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Running sugar at almost-native speeds in Windows

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:55 PM, S Page wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Dave Bauer wrote: >>  I haven't found an easy way to get QEMU working with acceleration on OS X. > > QEMU on Windows is also confused, or I am. > > http://sugarlabs.org/go/Supported_systems/Windows still points to >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Google summer of Code?

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz < bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jameson Quinn wrote: > > Honestly, this is news to me. (and I am the co-administrator of the > > Sugarlabs program). If I had to articulate my view of our

Re: [Sugar-devel] Google summer of Code?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jameson Quinn wrote: > Honestly, this is news to me. (and I am the co-administrator of the > Sugarlabs program). If I had to articulate my view of our priorities, it > would be something like the following: > > 7-10 points: Key sugar core improvements

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Running sugar at almost-native speeds in Windows

On 12.03.2009, at 21:12, Dave Bauer wrote: > Ok, I was able to take the Virtualbox VM and conver it to run in > Parallels, but its not easy and you definitely need to install the > Parallels Tools. I also have created a new Parallels native VM based > on SoaS slightly modifying the instructi

Re: [Sugar-devel] SugarBot in 2009

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Zach Riggle wrote: > Since XP was selected over Sugar as the standard environment for OLPC, I > have not picked up development of SugarBot to integrate it with the > sugar-jhbuild process. AFAIK, not a single XP machine has been shipped by OLPC. They continue to s

Re: [Sugar-devel] Google summer of Code?

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Mel Chua wrote: > > 2009/3/8 Jameson Quinn : >> > No definite agreement has been made, but in preliminary chats, it seems >> > that both organizations agree that anything for XS or specific to XO >> hardware >> > should go in OLPC, and everything else (general Sug

Re: [Sugar-devel] SugarBot in 2009

Since XP was selected over Sugar as the standard environment for OLPC, I have not picked up development of SugarBot to integrate it with the sugar-jhbuild process. If somebody else has interest in taking over the project, I would be glad to help :-) On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Simon Schampij

Re: [Sugar-devel] Google summer of Code?

> 2009/3/8 Jameson Quinn : > > No definite agreement has been made, but in preliminary chats, it seems > > that both organizations agree that anything for XS or specific to XO > hardware > > should go in OLPC, and everything else (general Sugar improvements, > > frameworks, or activities) should go