Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: Regarding the print support idea(GSoC)

2009-03-16 Thread Vamsi Krishna Davuluri
Ben, are you going to be mentoring this project? Or is there a *possible* mentor I can discuss about this on the IRC channel? On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > >> Vamsi Krishna Davuluri wrote: >> > Thank you! >> > >> > I think I'll do what you said, I'll just let ever

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Digest 2009-03-10

2009-03-16 Thread Bastien
Walter Bender writes: > === Sugar Digest === > > 1. Now that the Sugar community and the Release Team have wrapped up > 0.84, it is time to talk about our “Big Overarching Vision Goals for > 2009” I've written some notes in order to kick off the discussion. > > '''What are our objectives?''' I'v

[Sugar-devel] Regarding GSoC'09 projects (Educational toolkit and VideoChat activity)

2009-03-16 Thread Ajay Kumar
Hi everyone, I am Ajay Kumar Chintala, an engineering student from India. I am participating in GSoC 09 and found the sugar labs projects 'educational toolkit' and 'videoChat activity' intersting. I have knowledge in python and am familiar with telepathy. So, i can work on either one of these pro

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Localization] Access to multiple repos in SugarLabs gitorious

2009-03-16 Thread Chris Leonard
Tracing this back to the thread that started on sugar-devel, one part of the original question was about submitting translations for the infoslicer activity There is an open Trac ticket to get the infoslicer POT file hosted in Pootle. http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/419 As someone mentioned on su

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Video chat contact

2009-03-16 Thread Christoph Derndorfer
Guillaume Desmottes schrieb: > Le jeudi 12 mars 2009 à 10:59 +0100, Bernie Innocenti a écrit : >> [cc += sugar-devel@, morgs, guillaume] >> >> Christoph Derndorfer wrote: >>> after several attempts I finally managed to get the Video Chat activity >>> (http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Video_Chat) working

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] InfoSlicer-4

2009-03-16 Thread Laura Cowen
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:45:51 +, Aleksey Lim wrote: I've just installed V5 and the changes you've made look great. Definitely more integrated into Sugar now. :) > == Bundle == > > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/downloads/file/25952/infoslicer-5.xo > The link above actually do

[Sugar-devel] [Updated Invitation] Triaging Session, BugSquad @ Thu Mar 19 10am – 12pm (sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org)

2009-03-16 Thread Frederick Grose
BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART:20090319T14Z DTEND:20090319T16Z DTSTAMP:20090316T054815Z ORGANIZER:mailto:6n9a99dr5knag9tp0obc0rn...@group.calendar.google.com UID:cb3ibi4fng5e82b1il7qu8r...@

[Sugar-devel] [Invitation] Triaging Session , BugSquad @ Thu Apr 16 10am – 12pm (suga r-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org)

2009-03-16 Thread Frederick Grose
BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART:20090416T14Z DTEND:20090416T16Z DTSTAMP:20090316T054159Z ORGANIZER:mailto:6n9a99dr5knag9tp0obc0rn...@group.calendar.google.com UID:cb3ibi4fng5e82b1il7qu8r...@

[Sugar-devel] laptop.org pages for activities migrated to Sugar Labs

2009-03-16 Thread S Page
Summary: * Use new {{activity migrated to sl.o}} template on wiki pages of migrated activities. * Start to remove redundant incorrect information from them. * Continue to update activity template fragments for Activities/All and activity groups. * I changed {{OBX activity}} template's core/bundle

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Localization] Access to multiple repos in SugarLabs gitorious

2009-03-16 Thread Sayamindu Dasgupta
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Bastien wrote: > Thanks Chris for clarifying this. > > IIUC the documentation for the localization could have three parts: > > 1. l10n for Pootle admins > 2. l10n for activity developers > 3. l10n for other contributors > > The (1) would explain, among other stuff

Re: [Sugar-devel] Status of Pootle

2009-03-16 Thread Sayamindu Dasgupta
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Bastien wrote: > Gary C Martin writes: > >> Have a quick question: The translation set-up as I understand it is >> still 'push' only; that is to say once your Activity is in Pootle you >> can't make any changes to your activities /po files, as they will just >> ge

Re: [Sugar-devel] Status of Pootle

2009-03-16 Thread Bastien
Gary C Martin writes: > Have a quick question: The translation set-up as I understand it is > still 'push' only; that is to say once your Activity is in Pootle you > can't make any changes to your activities /po files, as they will just > get overwritten next time there is a push by Pootle

Re: [Sugar-devel] Idea for GSOC

2009-03-16 Thread Frederick Grose
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/ProjectIdeas Thank you for your contributions! 2009/3/16 vishak baby > Where can I post ideas for GSoc? > > ___ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/list

Re: [Sugar-devel] Status of Pootle

2009-03-16 Thread Gary C Martin
Hi Sayamindu, On 16 Mar 2009, at 13:10, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: > Hello everyone, > I realize that there is some confusion regarding the status of Pootle. > I guess I should have been a bit more clear about the status of > Pootle, and should have kept people up to date about the move - my > apo

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Localization] Access to multiple repos in SugarLabs gitorious

2009-03-16 Thread Bastien
Thanks Chris for clarifying this. IIUC the documentation for the localization could have three parts: 1. l10n for Pootle admins 2. l10n for activity developers 3. l10n for other contributors The (1) would explain, among other stuff, the interaction between the Pootle server and the user:pootle o

[Sugar-devel] Idea for GSOC

2009-03-16 Thread vishak baby
Where can I post ideas for GSoc? ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Priorities and Ideas (for GSoC)

2009-03-16 Thread Samuel Klein
Thanks, Sayamindu. I've put bookreaders, improvements to core activities (should offline email be there?) and schoolserver-related work near the top of the OLPC list at http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Summer_of_Code/Ideas Activities that can be used immediately in the field would make excellent OLPC

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Priorities and Ideas (for GSoC)

2009-03-16 Thread Samuel Klein
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > regardless of the scale of the GSoC program, it is small > relative to our needs and the potential size of the pool of interested > contributors. Therefore, we should consider designing a mentoring > program that can beyond the needs of GSoC.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Video chat contact

2009-03-16 Thread Guillaume Desmottes
Le lundi 16 mars 2009 à 14:23 +0100, Christoph Derndorfer a écrit : > Guillaume Desmottes schrieb: > > Le jeudi 12 mars 2009 à 10:59 +0100, Bernie Innocenti a écrit : > >> [cc += sugar-devel@, morgs, guillaume] > >> > >> Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > >>> after several attempts I finally managed to

[Sugar-devel] Status of Pootle

2009-03-16 Thread Sayamindu Dasgupta
Hello everyone, I realize that there is some confusion regarding the status of Pootle. I guess I should have been a bit more clear about the status of Pootle, and should have kept people up to date about the move - my apologies for not doing that. Regarding Pootle, we are waiting for the physical

Re: [Sugar-devel] Access to multiple repos in SugarLabs gitorious

2009-03-16 Thread Luke Faraone
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Bastien wrote: > I was just wondering whether gitorious let you give commit access for a > group of projects/activities, thinking that this would be useful. The > answer can be "No, it's not possible." or "No, it's not possible, but > that might be useful, we'll

Re: [Sugar-devel] Access to multiple repos in SugarLabs gitorious

2009-03-16 Thread Bastien
Luke Faraone writes: > Regardless of whatever looks more straightforward to you, we're looking to > implement a system that can be used by even non-technical people. It is better > to fix the underlying problem (not being in Pootle) that would allow for > collaboration by all translators than to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Access to multiple repos in SugarLabs gitorious

2009-03-16 Thread Luke Faraone
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Bastien wrote: > Aleksey Lim writes: > > another straightforward way is creating ticket on dev.sugarlabs.org > > with attached .po patch > > Well, `git push' looks more straightforward to me :) Regardless of whatever looks more straightforward to you, we're look

Re: [Sugar-devel] Etoys packaging (was: SugarPlatform-0.84.0 on Mandriva)

2009-03-16 Thread David Farning
2009/3/16 Bert Freudenberg : > On 16.03.2009, at 12:45, Aleksey Lim wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:11:05PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: >>> >>> One minor issue I see with this packaging is that etoys is technically >>> part of glucose, but you packaged it as part of fructose (as "etoys- >

[Sugar-devel] Etoys packaging (was: SugarPlatform-0.84.0 on Mandriva)

2009-03-16 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 16.03.2009, at 12:45, Aleksey Lim wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:11:05PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: One minor issue I see with this packaging is that etoys is technically part of glucose, but you packaged it as part of fructose (as "etoys- activity"). If someone was to only install

Re: [Sugar-devel] Access to multiple repos in SugarLabs gitorious

2009-03-16 Thread Bastien
Aleksey Lim writes: > another straightforward way is creating ticket on dev.sugarlabs.org > with attached .po patch Well, `git push' looks more straightforward to me :) -- Bastien ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://l

Re: [Sugar-devel] Access to multiple repos in SugarLabs gitorious

2009-03-16 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:15:18PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:32:44AM +0100, Bastien wrote: > > Hi Edward, > > > > Edward Cherlin writes: > > > > >> (As I said, I know what Pootle is good for, but I still don't like it. > > >> Would be nice to ease things for people w

Re: [Sugar-devel] Access to multiple repos in SugarLabs gitorious

2009-03-16 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:32:44AM +0100, Bastien wrote: > Hi Edward, > > Edward Cherlin writes: > > >> (As I said, I know what Pootle is good for, but I still don't like it. > >> Would be nice to ease things for people who don't want to use it, and > >> for activities that are not in it.) > > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] InfoSlicer-4

2009-03-16 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:36:09AM +, Laura Cowen wrote: > > On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:45:51 +, Aleksey Lim > wrote: > > I've just installed V5 and the changes you've made look great. Definitely > more integrated into Sugar now. :) > > > == Bundle == > > > > > http://activities.sugarlabs.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] SugarPlatform-0.84.0 on Mandriva

2009-03-16 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:11:05PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > One minor issue I see with this packaging is that etoys is technically > part of glucose, but you packaged it as part of fructose (as "etoys- > activity"). If someone was to only install glucose then another etoys- > based acti

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: Google Alert - "sugar labs"

2009-03-16 Thread Sean DALY
-- Forwarded message -- From: Google Alerts Date: Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:13 PM Subject: Google Alert - "sugar labs" To: sdaly...@gmail.com Google News Alert for: "sugar labs" Sugar Labs Nonprofit Announces New Version of Sugar Learning ... eReleases (press release) - Perry Hall

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] SugarPlatform-0.84.0 on Mandriva

2009-03-16 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 16.03.2009, at 11:31, Aleksey Lim wrote: > The Sugar Platform is a set of versioned components on which activity > authors can rely when targeting their activities to run on a > particular > Sugar version [1]. > > On Mandriva it lives in task-sugar meta-package [2] and includes: > - sugar-fru

Re: [Sugar-devel] Access to multiple repos in SugarLabs gitorious

2009-03-16 Thread Bastien
Hi Edward, Edward Cherlin writes: >> (As I said, I know what Pootle is good for, but I still don't like it. >> Would be nice to ease things for people who don't want to use it, and >> for activities that are not in it.) > > You can download the .po files and localize offline. Pootle is best > fo

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] SugarPlatform-0.84.0 on Mandriva

2009-03-16 Thread Aleksey Lim
The Sugar Platform is a set of versioned components on which activity authors can rely when targeting their activities to run on a particular Sugar version [1]. On Mandriva it lives in task-sugar meta-package [2] and includes: - sugar-fructose >= 0.84.0 - sugar-glucose >= 0.84.0 - gstreamer0.10-pl

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Video chat contact

2009-03-16 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Guillaume Desmottes wrote: > Maybe we could add a "video-chat" component on dev.sugarlabs.org ? Done. I called it "Video Chat" for naming consistency with the other activity components. Maybe we should come up with a more scalable way to add components in trac for all activities. -- // Bern

[Sugar-devel] Voicemail is live and press releases will be online shortly!

2009-03-16 Thread Sean DALY
As soon as the press releases (available in English, Spanish, French, and German) are up on the new Press page (http://www.sugarlabs.org/index.php?template=press), we will initiate the mailing to targeted journalists and educators! The Sugar Labs phone number for journalists is active at +1 (857)

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Video chat contact

2009-03-16 Thread Guillaume Desmottes
Le jeudi 12 mars 2009 à 10:59 +0100, Bernie Innocenti a écrit : > [cc += sugar-devel@, morgs, guillaume] > > Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > > after several attempts I finally managed to get the Video Chat activity > > (http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Video_Chat) working so Freemor and I could > > talk

Re: [Sugar-devel] Access to multiple repos in SugarLabs gitorious

2009-03-16 Thread Edward Cherlin
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Bastien wrote: > Luke Faraone writes: > >> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Bastien >> wrote: >> >>     I'm familiar with the Pootle OLPC server but my understanding was that >>     the gitorious page had more activities. >> >> Correct, however we have a reason