[suggest] request for multiple perl modules

2008-06-18 Thread Peter Willis
I just started using rpmforge and it's minimized the packaging I need to do by a great amount. However there are still some perl modules which I need that rpmforge does not provide, so i'd like to ask if they could be added to the list of maintained packages. The version numbers might not be th

Re: [suggest] request for multiple perl modules

2008-06-18 Thread Peter Willis
le.PL patches for both. Ralph Angenendt wrote: Peter Willis wrote: DBD::Oracle1.21 P/PY/PYTHIAN/DBD-Oracle-1.21.tar.gz AFAIR that one needs liboci.so (at least). So I don't think it can be packaged for rpmforge, can

Re: [suggest] request for multiple perl modules

2008-06-18 Thread Peter Willis
Dag Wieers wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Peter Willis wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: Peter Willis wrote: DBD::Oracle1.21 P/PY/PYTHIAN/DBD-Oracle-1.21.tar.gz AFAIR that one needs liboci.so (at least). So I don't think it can be packaged for rpmforge, can it

Re: [suggest] request for multiple perl modules

2008-06-22 Thread Peter Willis
Dag Wieers wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Peter Willis wrote: I just started using rpmforge and it's minimized the packaging I need to do by a great amount. However there are still some perl modules which I need that rpmforge does not provide, so i'd like to ask if they could be ad

[suggest] perl modules with conflicting man pages

2008-06-30 Thread Peter Willis
Hi, there are a couple perl modules in rpmforge which upgrade older versions in perl core, but the perl modules have man pages which exist in perl core and prevent them from being installed. These seem to be requirements for other perl modules so it is preventing yum from installing other modul

Re: [suggest] perl modules with conflicting man pages

2008-06-30 Thread Peter Willis
ding these modules is required for any 3rd-party modules already in rpmforge and reply to the list with the results. Dag Wieers wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Peter Willis wrote: Hi, there are a couple perl modules in rpmforge which upgrade older versions in perl core, but the perl modules have

Re: [suggest] Re: getmsmp3.spec contribution for review (rip MP3 off MySpace profiles)

2008-08-14 Thread Peter Willis
I have not built the package myself, but it appears that currently the application (not the spec) is broken; try to run it on any band profile or individual page with a song and it returns 404's. I would recommend waiting until the program has been updated and works before building a new packag

Re: [suggest] package for Net::MAC perl module

2008-09-18 Thread Peter Willis
While we're talking about the retarded Red Hat perl rpm, is anyone aware that perl 5.8 as shipped with RHEL has an unpatched bug which can cause an exponential slowdown when using overloading? (This might have been adressed here already, and if so please ignore me :-X) This blog post contains t

Re: [suggest] package for Net::MAC perl module

2008-09-18 Thread Peter Willis
rrata/RHBA-2008-0876.html Cu, Niels On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Peter Willis wrote: While we're talking about the retarded Red Hat perl rpm, is anyone aware that perl 5.8 as shipped with RHEL has an unpatched bug which can

Re: [suggest] perl-HTML-parser refresh

2008-12-10 Thread Peter Willis
This is interesting... I would like to look at this for building my own repo's. IIRC Dag uses dar-per.py which I believe you can find here: http://svn.rpmforge.net/svn/trunk/tools/dar/dar-perl.py Amos Shapira wrote: 2008/12/11 Dag Wieers<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I just did that. Will become

Re: [suggest] Update proftpd

2009-03-13 Thread Peter Willis
I might have missed it but I don't see an update for this package yet. Just FYI, versions < 1.3.2 are vulnerable to an SQL injection attack. (CVE-2009-0542,CVE-2009-0543) Shad L. Lords wrote: Would it be possible to build the latest proftpd package? The latest package you have seems to be 1.3

Re: [suggest] subversion 1.6.3 for EL4

2009-06-28 Thread Peter Willis
I had problems using serf with https svn so I built a newer neon in a non-standard path and linked against it. arnebjarn...@hotmail.com wrote: 1) I'll managed to compile 1.6.3 against the included python 2.3 on my out-of-the-box CentOS 4.7 (with a couple of patches :-) ) 2) I can't compile su

Re: [suggest] Dependencies listed in Perl module but not RPMforge package

2009-07-02 Thread Peter Willis
Christoph Maser wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 01.07.2009, 21:34 +0200 schrieb Dag Wieers: Good question. We do have SPEC files that still date back from before we used an automated process. I just checked what our tool would do (dar-diff-perl.sh) and it would in fact remove the BuildRequires altog