Re: wrong exit code for sv status in lsb mode

2019-03-13 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 08:19:30AM -0800, David Mountney via supervision wrote: > The error was introduced in commit 5fe1bc773c2d979093fe4b1f3ecbbed5e6acdaf0 > "sv.c: properly format status command's output on failure cases." > > Where the log status is being saved to the same variable as the

Re: wrong exit code for sv status in lsb mode

2019-01-08 Thread Gerrit Pape
Hi, donations for my free software increased recently, not sure why, but thanks. runit upstream sources with history still are available through $ git clone Below is the diff for sv.c from 2.1.1 to 2.1.2. Possibly anyone can spot the error and create a patch

Re: [PATCH 1/3] correct typo

2016-09-01 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 01:15:20PM +0200, Laurent Bercot wrote: > >I will be happy to send a 0/n introductory message (git send-email > >--compose) for any future proposed series, i was not aware that was the > >custom here. Indeed, i wrote this series because i could find no clear >

Re: listen(1): proposed addition to the runit suite

2016-08-22 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:58:55AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Hi Gerrit and other runit folks-- > > I'm working on a new tool that i think would fit well with runit, and i > was wondering if there is any interest in it as a contribution to the > runit suite. Hi Daniel, I'm sure many

Re: Runit debian package fix for Ubuntu 16.04

2016-08-22 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 09:02:22AM +0100, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote: > Pierre Jacomet: > > >I did a couple of fixes to the debian package installer such that > >the debian/ubuntu installer deals properly with the dichotomy > >between systemd and upstart and the fact that they both may be >

Re: runit maintenance - Re: patch: sv check should wait when svrun is not ready

2015-06-19 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 06:24:13PM -0700, Buck Evan wrote: How would you like to see the layout, build process look? Maybe there's an example project you like? If it's easy enough for me to try, I'd like to. First is moving away from slashpackage. Doing it similar to what Laurant does in his

runit maintenance - Re: patch: sv check should wait when svrun is not ready

2015-06-18 Thread Gerrit Pape
humble scripts, sorry. Gerrit is around, he's just a bit elusive. On 6/16/2015 9:37 AM, Buck Evan wrote: I'd still like to get this merged. Avery: are you the current maintainer? I haven't seen Gerrit Pape on the list. On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Buck Evan

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: logpipe error handling patch

2014-08-08 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 11:39:08AM +0200, Jan Pobrislo wrote: On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 05:32:16 + Gerrit Pape wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 03:01:16PM +0200, Jan Pobrislo wrote: I was under the assumption that the pipe is left open so you can send signals in case

Re: Update on our progress with Runit.

2014-08-08 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 10:55:15PM +, James Powell wrote: Also: This patch was released by Gerrit a while back for logpipe error handling. Hi James, I adjusted the patch a bit as testing showed a bug. You can

Re: svlogd timestamps fail on OpenBSD 5.5 (snapshot)

2014-07-30 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:16:55PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: This is a follow-up for a report sent by Mike in April. The problem here is that on some platforms such as OpenBSD and NetBSD, time_t has been enlarged to 64 bits even on ILP32. Since time_t is already used in the