Re: svlogd timestamps fail on OpenBSD 5.5 (snapshot)

2014-07-30 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:16:55PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > This is a follow-up for a report sent by Mike in April. The problem > here is that on some platforms such as OpenBSD and NetBSD, time_t has > been enlarged to 64 bits even on ILP32. Since time_t is already used in > the r

Re: svlogd timestamps fail on OpenBSD 5.5 (snapshot)

2014-07-29 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Hi. This is a follow-up for a report sent by Mike in April. The problem here is that on some platforms such as OpenBSD and NetBSD, time_t has been enlarged to 64 bits even on ILP32. Since time_t is already used in the runit source code I think that this diff can only make things better. htt

Re: svlogd timestamps fail on OpenBSD 5.5 (snapshot)

2014-04-22 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Mike Jackson writes: > On 22 Apr 2014, at 02.52, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > >> j...@wxcvbn.org (Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas) writes: >> >> You funny ezmlm, where have you hidden my patch? >> >> This is not a blind guess anymore, please confirm that it fix your >> problem. >> >> --- src/fm

Re: svlogd timestamps fail on OpenBSD 5.5 (snapshot)

2014-04-21 Thread Mike Jackson
On 22 Apr 2014, at 02.52, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > j...@wxcvbn.org (Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas) writes: > > You funny ezmlm, where have you hidden my patch? > > This is not a blind guess anymore, please confirm that it fix your > problem. > > --- src/fmt_ptime.c.orig Tue Nov 21 16

Re: svlogd timestamps fail on OpenBSD 5.5 (snapshot)

2014-04-21 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
j...@wxcvbn.org (Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas) writes: > Mike Jackson writes: > >> Hi, > > Hi, > >> I’ve just setup a new OpenBSD 5.5 (snapshot) machine and noticed that svlogd >> logs all timestamps as such: >> >> 1900-01-00_00:00:00.95511 >> >> where the seconds never increment, only the 95511 por

Re: svlogd timestamps fail on OpenBSD 5.5 (snapshot)

2014-04-21 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Mike Jackson writes: > Hi, Hi, > I’ve just setup a new OpenBSD 5.5 (snapshot) machine and noticed that svlogd > logs all timestamps as such: > > 1900-01-00_00:00:00.95511 > > where the seconds never increment, only the 95511 portion will roll over and > start back from zero, thus making svlog

svlogd timestamps fail on OpenBSD 5.5 (snapshot)

2014-04-21 Thread Mike Jackson
Hi, I’ve just setup a new OpenBSD 5.5 (snapshot) machine and noticed that svlogd logs all timestamps as such: 1900-01-00_00:00:00.95511 where the seconds never increment, only the 95511 portion will roll over and start back from zero, thus making svlogd’s timestamps useless. I’m running svlog