Re: svn commit: r228471 - in head/sys: boot/arm/at91/libat91 dev/cm dev/de dev/fdc dev/pccard dev/spibus dev/xen/netback pc98/cbus

Bruce, * Bruce Evans , 20111214 04:26: > And using inline instead of __inline breaks C90 compilers. Unline const > and signed, inline is new in C99, and there are still usable C90 compilers > (e.g., c89, gcc -std=c89 and old(?) versions of TenDRA) which will break > if it is spelled inline. C90

Re: svn commit: r228471 - in head/sys: boot/arm/at91/libat91 dev/cm dev/de dev/fdc dev/pccard dev/spibus dev/xen/netback pc98/cbus

On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: Log: Replace `inline static' by `static inline'. If I interpret the C standard correctly, the storage specifier should be placed before the inline keyword. While at it, replace __inline by inline in the files affected. No, declaration-spec

Re: svn commit: r228471 - in head/sys: boot/arm/at91/libat91 dev/cm dev/de dev/fdc dev/pccard dev/spibus dev/xen/netback pc98/cbus

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:06:01PM +, Ed Schouten wrote: > Author: ed > Date: Tue Dec 13 14:06:01 2011 > New Revision: 228471 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/228471 > > Log: > Replace `inline static' by `static inline'. > > If I interpret the C standard correctly, the stora

svn commit: r228471 - in head/sys: boot/arm/at91/libat91 dev/cm dev/de dev/fdc dev/pccard dev/spibus dev/xen/netback pc98/cbus

Author: ed Date: Tue Dec 13 14:06:01 2011 New Revision: 228471 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/228471 Log: Replace `inline static' by `static inline'. If I interpret the C standard correctly, the storage specifier should be placed before the inline keyword. While at it, replace