Please have a look at the slowly shaping up page on frontend comparison
in our wiki.
http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Choosing_a_SWORD_program
DM and I have brought it into a much more easily readable format and
have further broken down all narratives etc into questions which can be
answered with ye
Here you go Peter,
Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. I'd fallen and couldn't reach my
keyboard :-)
Daniel Blake
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Dan Blake wrote:
Eeli mentioned using graphics for some of the items to conserve space.
Here are very small graphics for supported operating syste
Ben,
I think the module developer should decide on this. As a module
developer I found it frustrating that only two front-ends, both of them
compiled only for Linux at the time, supported book level
introductions. When one front-end doesn't support a well-discussed
feature it is hard to know w
Ben,
I think the module developer should decide on this. As a module
developer I found it frustrating that only two front-ends, both of them
compiled only for Linux at the time, supported book level
introductions. When one front-end doesn't support a well-discussed
feature it is hard to know w
Dan Blake wrote:
> Eeli mentioned using graphics for some of the items to conserve space.
> Here are very small graphics for supported operating systems.
Thanks Dan!
You know what I really would like to have is a minimalistic graphic for
yes/no/partial or some such.
Peter
Ben Morgan wrote:
> I don't think book level introductions are usually particularly
> important - definitely not a serious bug. Chapter level ones may be
> important. They are usually suplementary material which isn't all that
> important. If the user gets it, fine. If they don't, they are unlikely
Eeli mentioned using graphics for some of the items to conserve space.
Here are very small graphics for supported operating systems. I'm not
sure if they will work good enough, but here they are. Sorry about
attaching them to the message but I didn't have a place to host them
right now.
Da
Ben Morgan wrote:
> I don't think book level introductions are usually particularly
> important - definitely not a serious bug.
I think this is a decision for the module maker and not for the tool
maker. As long as the sword engine supports a feature, module makers
will make use of it - if they
On 01/03/2009, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>
> Chris Little wrote:
> >
> >
> > Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> >> Manfred Bergmann writes:
> >>> What is meant by "Ancillary texts" and "Verse Lists"?
> >>
> >> Many modules, both Bibles and commentaries, have additional introductory
> >> material at the ficti
On Feb 28, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Chris Little wrote:
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
Manfred Bergmann writes:
What is meant by "Ancillary texts" and "Verse Lists"?
Many modules, both Bibles and commentaries, have additional
introductory
material at the fictitious n:0 and 0:0 references. Some apps ar
Chris Little wrote:
>
>
> Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
>> Manfred Bergmann writes:
>>> What is meant by "Ancillary texts" and "Verse Lists"?
>>
>> Many modules, both Bibles and commentaries, have additional introductory
>> material at the fictitious n:0 and 0:0 references. Some apps are able
>> to di
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
Manfred Bergmann writes:
What is meant by "Ancillary texts" and "Verse Lists"?
Many modules, both Bibles and commentaries, have additional introductory
material at the fictitious n:0 and 0:0 references. Some apps are able
to display this information; Xiphos does so i
Manfred Bergmann writes:
> What is meant by "Ancillary texts" and "Verse Lists"?
Many modules, both Bibles and commentaries, have additional introductory
material at the fictitious n:0 and 0:0 references. Some apps are able
to display this information; Xiphos does so if headings are enabled,
bec
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
- The format has been mangled a bit, because you've put Read Aloud in
but it shows up under "Portable" :-)
Fixed
- Dom will be annoyed that you left French off the GUI languages list.
Ouch. Fixed
I have taken out the maintained column - it is clearly useless if all
14 matches
Mail list logo