On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 5:13 AM Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> would it be possible to add a Condition to check if a drbd
> resource ( a virtual block device with replication via network,
> see https://linbit.com/drbd/) is primary? I checked
>
> /sys/devices/virtual/block/drbd1
>
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 5:03 PM Joey Dodson wrote:
>
> Hello list!
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance for any help or thoughts!
>
>
>
> Background:
>
>
>
> I have a system where many ‘/etc/systemd/system’ symlink paths got replaced
> by files. Therefore, ‘systemctl enable’ no longer works for a majority
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 9:12 PM Tr4sK wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm trying to get my head around to connect my debian box to a mikrotik
> router.
Mikrotik devices support Wireguard these days.
It will outperform pretty much everything you want to use like 3x or something.
Just probably don't want this at
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 6:17 AM Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:48 AM Luca Boccassi
> wrote:
>
> > However, logging should work out of the box as long as the journal is
> > used, what problem are you seeing exactly?
>
> Starting around the shutdown and new start of
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 7:44 AM Aleksandar Kostadinov
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I want to enable systemd-resolved in early boot so that `clevis` can
> resolve `tang` address by mdns. This will simplify local network
> configuration by not relying on static IP addresses.
>
> But it seems that is not
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 4:37 PM anthony_ful...@trendmicro.com
wrote:
>
> I tried this on a fresh installation of Fedora Workstation 39. I installed
> wireshark and set the filter to `tcp.port == 5355` then ran the python script
> again with an ip of `123.123.123.123` and I see an outbound
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:13 PM anthony_ful...@trendmicro.com
wrote:
I tried again now with packet capture software and no such behaviour
was found. ..what you have in the hosts line of nsswitch.conf ?
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 2:09 PM anthony_ful...@trendmicro.com
wrote:
>
> Port 5355 is used for LLMNR and RFC-4795 [4], states in the abstract that
> “LLMNR only operates on the local link” so I think the current behavior of
> contacting hosts on port 5355 is incorrect, especially if that host
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 5:42 PM Murrell, Robert A.
wrote:
> I finally got everything working. Here is what I did to fix the problem:
>
>
>
> adduser systemd-network root
>
> adduser systemd-resolve root
>
> adduser bind root
>
> find /etc -type d -exec chmod 755 {} +
>
No!.. Now you are
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 12:17 PM ashok athukuri wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> In my Linux box, Initially both services "systemd-timedated.service" and
> "systemd-timesyncd.service" are inactive
> When I executed command:
> #timedatectl set-ntp true
> Failed to set ntp: Connection timed out
>
> But I
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:08 AM Jordi Auge <
jordi.a...@technica-engineering.de> wrote:
>
> So, what would be the correct behaviour here?
>
> So it claims to behave like the standard bridge but doesn't.. looks like a
bug on your switch device driver.
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 5:01 AM Renjaya Raga Zenta
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We want to implement our networking using systemd-networkd. We think
> systemd is stable enough right now, so we want to try more "systemd-only"
> solution.
>
> In our environment, we use RPS (Receive Packet Steering) for load
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 1:17 AM wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have decided to replace buysbox init with systemd in our development
> boards Buildroot images.
>
> One of the boards -
> https://www.microchip.com/en-us/development-tool/atsama5d27-som1-ek1
>
> While we notice the reduction in boot time as
On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 12:46 AM Tony Rodriguez
wrote:
> On 10/27/23 07:06, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Do, 26.10.23 19:03, Tony Rodriguez (unixpro1...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> Experiencing this same issue with iSCSI and systemd-239 for RH8/Rocky8
> and
> >> RH9/Rocky9 system-252. Nothing
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 6:38 PM Muggeridge, Matt
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am noticing networkd has a number of IPv6 compliance issues, where it is
> not meeting various RFC's "must" requirements. For comparison, when I stop
> networkd and configure the network via legacy methods, the protocol
>
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:44 PM Virendra Negi <
virendra.n...@sugarboxnetworks.com> wrote:
> @Windl but the logs are sent to rsyslog is over unix socket.
>
It doesn't matter. just don't. This is a bad idea, will perform very poorly
on production, it is not designed from the ground up for
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 7:41 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
>
> There are conflicting goals here: nice, reliably behaviour that config
> changes are guaranteed to be taken into account, and a simple goal of
> performance to reduce these stat calls.
>
An option to simply ignore resolv.conf
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 12:09 PM Kevin P wrote:
>
> Hello Greg and thanks for answering :)
> I never used strace, so I couldn't figure from the output, but further
> research led me to this post:
> http://www.pclinuxos.com/forum/index.php?topic=135714.0
> So I just tried (on the host):
> chmod
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 5:42 AM Yolo von BNANA wrote:
> If you’ve done any investigation into systemd.sockets, you may believe that
> it makes super servers like xinetd obsolete. At this point in time, that is
> not true. The xinetd super server offers more functionality than
>
What do you mean with memory increase ?
sd_bus is unlikely to have any severe memory leak under normal
conditions (if there is any, they are usually found in error paths) so
you are either mis-using the api or misunderstanding memory
management. if there is any memory leak either in your code or
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 1:04 PM Steve Dodd wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Dec 2021 at 10:11, Jonathan Kelly wrote:
>
> > No. I'm in the middle here ... trying to compile unicon and it borks ...
> the unicon people don't know anything about random-util.c ... it not part
> of their software.
>
> Only thing
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 10:53 PM Jonathan Kelly
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in trying to compile unicon programming language - I'm on arch linux ...
>
> Linux arch 5.15.10-arch1-1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri, 17 Dec 2021 11:17:37
> + x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> ... I'm getting this error
>
> make[2]: Entering
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 4:44 PM Kenneth Porter wrote:
>
> I just installed the new-to-EPEL ndppd service and am seeing this in my log:
>
> Oct 17 21:10:08 saruman systemd: Can't open PID file
> /var/run/ndppd/ndppd.pid (yet?) after start: No such file or directory
>
> Examining the source, I see
The function is used.. only when HAVE_LIBCRYPTSETUP.
You either need to define it on an #ifdef HAVE_LIBCRYPTSETUP or add add an
__attribute__(__unused__) to it, then the warning will shut up and the
linker may garbage collect it later.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 12:50 PM Marcus Harrison
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 9:35 PM 李成刚 wrote:
>
> How to configure this service so that it will not automatically exit
So what are you trying to accomplish with this ? why do you need yet
another service running when it is totally idle ?
> When the systemd-hostnamed service is started through
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 9:16 AM Norbert Lange wrote:
>
> It should be "supported" in the way that exceptions will *not*
> propagate in C libraries, and your program will call std::terminate
> should one callback throw an exception.
> Mark your callbacks with 'noexcept', statical analysis might
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 5:13 AM Kenneth Porter wrote:
>
> What happens if I list multiple services in a Wants= and After= clause that
> are mutually exclusive (eg. sendmail/postfix/exim? How can I say "This unit
> needs to send mail" without knowing which is enabled?
Unfortunately "need to send
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 7:55 AM Carlo Wood wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:40:25 +0100
> Carlo Wood wrote:
>
> > I'm not writing my own C++ wrappers around sbus.
>
> I'm now* writing my own C++ wrappers around sbus.
>
>
JUst curious..what is wrong with QTDbus.. ? I strongly suggest you against
>
>
>
> $ systemctl status $$
>
> They wrote a tight loop that just kept calling that command,
>
I just did and memory use remain constant, so whatever your problem is I
cannot reproduce or was fixed ages ago.
A noticeable memory leak should be easily reproducible and fixed building
systemd
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 8:22 AM Robert P. J. Day
wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2021, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > On Do, 18.02.21 11:48, Robert P. J. Day (rpj...@crashcourse.ca) wrote:
> >
> > > A colleague has reported the following apparent issue in a fairly
> > > old (v230) version of systemd
Glibc needs /proc mounted so the answer is no.
El El mar, 9 de feb. de 2021 a la(s) 12:05, Antonius Frie <
antonius.f...@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> escribió:
> Hi!
>
> So this is kind of a follow-up to the thread in [1], and the
> corresponding PR in [2].
>
> In short, the PR made some changes to allow
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:39 PM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LTOByDefault
>
> (I think Suse is even further ahead on this)
Yes. lto is already on by default, on worthiness of t..the jury is still out..
___
systemd-devel
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 4:17 PM Jędrzej Dudkiewicz
wrote:
> Sorry, of course source port -
No, you really want UDP source port randomization using whatever
algorithm the kernel chooses to, due to security reasons.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 9:34 AM Belisko Marek wrote:
>
Am I still
> missing something? Thanks.
Yes, what you are trying to do is the wrong thing(tm) to do, please
figure out why there is filesystem corruption in the first place,
while ext4 of course has bugs like any software around, it is not
> >while (e->state != SD_EVENT_FINISHED) {
> >r = sd_event_run(e, (uint64_t) -1);
> >
> > But since e->state is changed by another thread it
Well..then the game is up because sd-bus does not claim to be thread
safe or even aspires to be.. accessing e from different
El 09-01-2019 a las 10:35, hemanthkuma...@vakilsearch.com escribió:
Hi All,
I am facing the problem in MongDB after the Path. So help me ti sort the
issue
[root@ca-mongo mongo]# cat /etc/mongod.conf
Please ask in mongodb users list, this problem has nothing to do with
systemd
El 04-01-2019 a las 2:50, Mantas Mikulėnas escribió:
That's because the specified interface is not a bridge...
Yeah, that and it is a wireless interface..it may not work .. OP needs
to use ipvlan instead.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
El 21-11-2018 a las 11:08, deepan muthusamy escribió:
> Can u please tell me what are all the things I have to add in .service
file to store all logs into a log file.
Some daemons provide an option to log to file, use that if available,
otherwise make your program write debug or log
El 13-11-2018 a las 9:49, David Parsley escribió:
I disagree; privacy of environment variables to individual users on the
system is as fundamental as Unix file permissions.
Please find us ONE reference to a relevant, current *nix standard that
says environment variables are either secret,
El 09-11-2018 a las 1:08, deepan muthusamy escribió:
I created a session bus as system service. And iam connecting to that
session bus. My requirement is like this, that's why I'm doing this.@ Simon.
Well..considering that Simon literally wrote the dbus daemon I will
certainly listen to
El 08-11-2018 a las 11:02, deepan muthusamy escribió:
If I start my application as system service, it is consuming huge
memory. This leads to my system getting slow down.
If I start manually, it's not consuming that much memory.
What can be the possible reasons?
Your application has a
El 05-11-2018 a las 3:17, piliu escribió:
During this service, the power state can not be got from sysfs, neither
it can be got by systemd's utility. So is it acceptable to signal the
failure of service by a tmp file under /tmp ? I.e adding
FailureAction=touch /tmp/poweroff_fail in
El 01-11-2018 a las 5:34, piliu escribió:
Any suggestion?
Yeah. Don't..if poweroff fails reboot will too..please attack the root
cause of this problem.. why the machine fails to poweroff, is it a
service blocking poweroff ? is there a kernel bug ?
El 01-11-2018 a las 9:41, Paul Menzel escribió:
If yes, do you have any hints before I start to dig into that?
opening TUN/TAP interfaces and changing routing is a privileged operation.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
El 24-09-2018 a las 13:30, Andrei Borzenkov escribió:
This process is spawned as special kernel thread, even though it is
otherwise normal user process.
WUT ? So how is this new kind of task supposed to be handled by
userspace ? looks like a kernel bug to me.
El 04-07-2018 a las 15:42, Kevin Greene escribió:
Thanks Simon. I have tried doing that actually, but the arm64 version
doesn't seem to be available. I'm on Ubuntu 16.04 fwiw.
Are you entirely sure that's the case?.. I mean.. you do not go very far
without libudev-dev in a modern binary
El 02-05-2018 a las 6:25, Lennart Poettering escribió:
On Di, 01.05.18 18:08, Vito Caputo (vcap...@pengaru.com) wrote:
Or maybe this confusion is just another iteration of the stuff
dicussed here? https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/4167
On modern x86 hardware we could fallback to
El 21-01-2018 a las 8:12, Yubin Ruan escribió:
Hi,
I use offlineimap to synchronize my emails. I want it to do a synchronization
at system startup so recently I add a systemd service for it. However I always
get error like this:
EOF occurred in violation of protocol (_ssl.c:590)
Socket
El 08-09-2017 a las 16:58, Robert Washbourne escribió:
On systemctl start packagekit:
packagekitd[18300]: failed to setup context: metadata expire time too
small, has to be at least one second
I'm sorry if this is the wrong place to post, please point me in the
right direction
---
src/shared/seccomp-util.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/shared/seccomp-util.c b/src/shared/seccomp-util.c
index 29eb2b17d..0857f5907 100644
--- a/src/shared/seccomp-util.c
+++ b/src/shared/seccomp-util.c
@@ -403,6 +403,7 @@ const SyscallFilterSet
El 11-07-2017 a las 18:23, WANG Siyuan escribió:
> Hi, all
> systemd-udevd invoked oom-killer during Linux boot. I open debug message
> of systemd-udevd. But I can't find where the problem is. Could anybody
> help me? Thanks very much.
The oom-killer should never be invoked on udev at boot..
El 20-03-2017 a las 10:26, D.S. Ljungmark escribió:
> I find your argument to be strange.
>
> "The kernel has this functionality, please do not use it and rather
> reimplement it in every piece of userspace that ever needs it, because
> that's supposed to be more secure."
>
> I simply don't
El 20-02-2017 a las 18:44, Rao Vz escribió:
> Hi, Guys
> Any help is appreciated.
>
Most likely you went over TasksMax.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Alessandro Cellini wrote:
> ***
> -- Unit mysql.service has failed.
> --
> -- The result is failed.
HI:
Neither the mysql package nor the mysql.service are provided by the
systemd project but by your
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Yankun,
>
> yan...@iscas.ac.cn [2015-11-05 23:24 +0800]:
>> I can not find a available uri for systemd in china
>
> Sorry, but I don't understand at all what this means.
It may be blocked by internet censors..is
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 5:00 AM, RayBloodworth k870818...@outlook.com wrote:
From this boot chart, dbus.service starts after systemd-logind.service, but
dbus.service takes littile time for launching.
This is a bug, fixed in v209.. commit
8f9c6fe5ff1d59001aecbf3fbf9ca0ed7ff28ba7
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:05 AM, RayBloodworth k870818...@outlook.com wrote:
Hi, everyone
I'm optimizing booting performance of my system.
systemd version: 208
platform: freescale i.MX6D Cortex-A9
Please test again with a current release, I doubt anyone here will
help if you are
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Lesley Kimmel ljkimme...@hotmail.com wrote:
Jonathan;
Thanks for the background and information. Since you clearly seem to have a
grasp of systemd please humour me with a few more questions (some of them
slightly ignorant):
a) Why are PID bad?
Because they
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Johannes Bauer dfnsonfsdu...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi list,
I'm seeing a very odd issue with udev and I'm not really sure which
component could/would be responsible -- udev is pretty much my only hope.
Probably GregKH can assist you with this problem, udev is not at
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:33 PM, cee1 fykc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I maybe got confused.
First, systemd-random-seed.service will save a seed from
/dev/urandom when shutdown, and load that seed to /dev/urandom when
next boot up.
My questions are:
1. Can we not save a seed, but load a
El jun. 14, 2015 10:21, cee1 fykc...@gmail.com escribió:
Hi all,
Why we need to read/save random seed? Can it be read from /dev/random
each time?
Because the kernel is borked and still is needs to be fed of entropy at
system startup by user space. Please read the random man page.
I agree we
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:49:55PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
El jun. 14, 2015 10:21, cee1 fykc...@gmail.com escribió:
Hi all,
Why we need to read/save random seed? Can it be read from /dev/random each
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 02:11:53PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:49:55PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
El
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Chris Morgan chmor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
systemd 216 here on an embedded arm system, 1ghz with a load of 60% or
more. I enabled tab completion, because I really don't like to type,
and quickly found out that something like:
systemctl status xxtab tab
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:21 PM, aaron_wri...@selinc.com wrote:
Brandon Philips bran...@ifup.co wrote on 05/28/2015 05:10:33 PM:
Access to the system dbus is controlled by dbus policies. You will
need to write a policy for giving this user access to the systemd1 object.
I compiled systemd
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a simple way to make a service require that a specific network
interface/IP address be active?
You have to wait for the *link* to be active, not for the interface..
I have a manually set up bridge and dnsmasq
It was a warning when we still supported kernel 3.4. current
minimum version is 3.7.
---
src/core/main.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/core/main.c b/src/core/main.c
index c39815b..3bebc98 100644
--- a/src/core/main.c
+++ b/src/core/main.c
@@ -1608,9
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Tue, 19.05.15 20:17, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote:
All this checks are always true in any modernish linux system.
---
configure.ac | 11 ---
1 file changed, 11 deletions
All this checks are always true in any modernish linux system.
---
configure.ac | 11 ---
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 3efee22..cd6375b 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1293,17 +1293,6 @@
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:24 AM, cee1 fykc...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-05-17 17:45 GMT+08:00 Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com:
Hello cee,
cee1 [2015-05-16 0:46 +0800]:
Thanks for the suggestion, it was other processes running in parallel
which presumably consuming lots of IO, after sending
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Cristian Rodríguez
crrodrig...@opensuse.org wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:24 AM, cee1 fykc...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-05-17 17:45 GMT+08:00 Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com:
Hello cee,
cee1 [2015-05-16 0:46 +0800]:
Thanks for the suggestion, it was other
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
Fixed in git. Please verify.
It is OK now.. Thank you.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
It is a leftover from multi-seat-x wrapper which is long
gone.
---
Makefile.am | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 211ce6a..4639b2f 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -203,7 +203,6 @@ AM_CPPFLAGS = \
$ /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-timedated (wait until auto-exit)
=
==396==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 928 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f782f788db1 in __interceptor_calloc
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Daniel Mack dan...@zonque.org wrote:
We should still keep this flush, right?
-sd_bus_unref(bus);
}
The cleanup function already does :
static inline void sd_bus_close_unrefp(sd_bus **bus) {
if (*bus) {
=
==64281==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 32 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f623c961c4a in malloc (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.2+0x96c4a)
#1 0x5651f79ad34e in malloc_multiply
In this usecase, the file will never be materialized
with linkat().
---
src/shared/util.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/shared/util.c b/src/shared/util.c
index c5c1b0c..f295edb 100644
--- a/src/shared/util.c
+++ b/src/shared/util.c
@@ -4838,7 +4838,7 @@
resolved crashes on SIGTERM with ...
=
==33557==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address
0x60c0bd60 at pc 0x556098c5 bp 0x7fffde70 sp
0x7fffde68
READ of size 8 at 0x60c0bd60 thread T0
#0
If systemd is built with GCC address sanitizer or leak sanitizer
the following memory leak ocurs:
May 12 02:02:46 linux.site systemd[326]:
=
May 12 02:02:46 linux.site systemd[326]: ==326==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected
memory
Building with address sanitizer enabled on GCC 5.1.x a memory leak
is reported because we never close the bus, fix it by using
cleanup variable attribute.
---
src/libsystemd/sd-bus/test-bus-chat.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
---
Makefile.am | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 1ec1e77..e4d00a8 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -6333,7 +6333,7 @@ libsystemd_journal_la_SOURCES = \
src/compat-libs/libsystemd-journal.sym
Otherwise make check ends in failed state.
---
po/POTFILES.in | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/po/POTFILES.in b/po/POTFILES.in
index 70e7594..b4c1121 100644
--- a/po/POTFILES.in
+++ b/po/POTFILES.in
@@ -5,4 +5,3 @@ src/locale/org.freedesktop.locale1.policy.in
- Nicer easier to remember than fcntl(fd, F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC, 3)
- Update CODING_STYLE
- Use it tree-wide
---
CODING_STYLE | 6 +++---
src/import/curl-util.c | 2 +-
src/import/importd.c | 4 ++--
src/journal/cat.c| 2 +-
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
Groups *suck* as authentication scheme. If you add one group for each
privilege you want, then you'll have a huge number of groups, and
that's hardly desirable. It's pretty close to being unmanagable with
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Matt Hoosier matt.hoos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 17.04.15 09:00, Matt Hoosier (matt.hoos...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing to see whether there's a best way to allow
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Tue, 17.03.15 10:54, Peter Paule (systemd-de...@fedux.org) wrote:
Hi,
does it make sense to check if the system is started as a container in
systemd-remount-fs.service and only start the service if the system
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Jordan Hargrave jhar...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be nice if systemd could discover and display enclosure/bay slot
mappings for drives in the system. The /dev/disk/by-path method doesn't
quite work, for SAS drives the ID can change on hotplug. The slot mapping
Logs constantly show
systemd-journald[395]: Failed to set file attributes: Inappropriate
ioctl for device
This is because ext4 does not support FS_NOCOW_FL.
---
src/journal/journal-file.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/journal/journal-file.c
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Cristian Rodríguez
crrodrig...@opensuse.org wrote:
Is the attached version cool for you ?
Ping ? Any comments about this one ? note that implementing the
specifier expansion in all cases for argument does not make sense to
me unless I am missing something
El 22/02/15 a las 23:08, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton escribió:
the problem, zbigniew, is that the intended use of this silent noop
feature - to make it *possible* to have an alternative PID1 - *hasn't
happened*. any upstream software developer who has added in support
for systemd has done
El 22/02/15 a las 22:37, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton escribió:
well, you could provide hints in the documentation (and force them to
be read by deliberately changing the API)
Wow.. so what you want is even nuttier than I thought..
that would be a good place to start, showing people how
assert(b-pipe[0] = 0 b-pipe[0] = 0);
Test the same condition twice, pretty sure we mean
assert(b-pipe[0] = 0 b-pipe[1] = 0);
---
src/shared/barrier.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/shared/barrier.c b/src/shared/barrier.c
index f65363a..b7dca75 100644
---
src/shared/util.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/shared/util.c b/src/shared/util.c
index dc65280..6729461 100644
--- a/src/shared/util.c
+++ b/src/shared/util.c
@@ -1692,6 +1692,7 @@ bool chars_intersect(const char *a, const char *b) {
bool fstype_is_network(const
El 18/02/15 a las 15:58, Lennart Poettering escribió:
On Wed, 18.02.15 15:45, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote:
LTO may be unreliable, does not work properly in several archs
It may crash or produce wrong code.
Well, that's something to fix in the LTO code.
Compiler
El 18/02/15 a las 07:10, Lennart Poettering escribió:
On Tue, 17.02.15 17:35, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote:
Please fix this for all arguments, not just symlinks.
Thanks for taking a look, I will post a complete version later
Hi:
It appears that with the exception of /run/tmpfiles.d , the rest of the
volatile conf_file_dirs are never created at boot. Is this intentional ?
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
El 17/02/15 a las 15:38, Cristian Rodríguez escribió:
HI:
In openSUSE, we have per *running kernel* sysctl snippets, currently
implemented as patch on systemd-sysctl.. I 'm currently attempting to
replace it for something sane..like
d /run/sysctl.d
L/run/sysctl.d/00-sysctl.conf-%v
HI:
In openSUSE, we have per *running kernel* sysctl snippets, currently
implemented as patch on systemd-sysctl.. I 'm currently attempting to
replace it for something sane..like
d /run/sysctl.d
L/run/sysctl.d/00-sysctl.conf-%v ---- /boot/sysctl.conf-%v
BUt argument does
El 16/02/15 a las 14:46, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson escribió:
On 02/16/2015 05:40 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 16.02.15 17:39, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 02/16/2015 03:42 PM, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
May be in /sbin or /usr/sbin
You might want to resubmit
If there is no resume= ..it is not possible to
hubrid-sleep or hibernate
---
units/systemd-hibernate.service.in| 1 +
units/systemd-hybrid-sleep.service.in | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/units/systemd-hibernate.service.in
b/units/systemd-hibernate.service.in
index
1 - 100 of 292 matches
Mail list logo