Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-11-05 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 04.11.14 14:48, Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > Can you be more specific what precisely you intend to hook in there? > > > > I'd really prefer if we could find different solutions for the common > > > > usecases. > > > > > > Example: I'd like to add interface to proper fir

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-11-04 Thread Dan Williams
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 19:40 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > BOn Tue, 04.11.14 19:07, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 08:36:10AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Wed, 01.10.14 21:36, Cameron Norman (camerontnor...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-11-04 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 11/04/2014 06:07 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: Example: I'd like to add interface to proper firewalld "zone". Ideally it could be done by networkd itself (it just one dbus call: addInterface(in s zone, in s interface, …) based on new Zone=string setting in .netdev file. Hook can determine w

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-11-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
BOn Tue, 04.11.14 19:07, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 08:36:10AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Wed, 01.10.14 21:36, Cameron Norman (camerontnor...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > ifupdown [1], NetworkManager, and WICD all support h

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-11-04 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 08:36:10AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 01.10.14 21:36, Cameron Norman (camerontnor...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > ifupdown [1], NetworkManager, and WICD all support hooks for when a > > network interface is configured or deconfigured (before and a

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-10-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 09.10.14 18:38, Cameron Norman (camerontnor...@gmail.com) wrote: > >actually not using avahi-autoipd is the way you really want to go. > >Especially since networkd will do IPv4LL setup for you anyway. Same > >applies to ethtool hooks since they should be done by link files and > >configure

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-10-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 10.10.14 17:40, Dale R. Worley (wor...@alum.mit.edu) wrote: > > From: Tom Gundersen > > > What we do, however, is to expose the configuration state using the > > sd-network C API, which external programs can watch and react on (see > > how timesyncd and resolved currently works). > > In

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-10-11 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote: >> From: Tom Gundersen > >> What we do, however, is to expose the configuration state using the >> sd-network C API, which external programs can watch and react on (see >> how timesyncd and resolved currently works). > > In a situation where

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-10-10 Thread Dale R. Worley
> From: Tom Gundersen > What we do, however, is to expose the configuration state using the > sd-network C API, which external programs can watch and react on (see > how timesyncd and resolved currently works). In a situation where one wants to do what a "hook" does, having a separate daemon pro

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-10-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 07:24:07AM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > For the wpa_supplicant, we are going to fix that one with a proper daemon > soon. Interesting. Can you shed some light on this? Zbyszek ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-10-09 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Cameron Norman wrote: > udev was indeed my first thought for ethtool, however how would the ethtool > commands be hooked in on containers? Or is ethtool not relevant there? In a container you'll either have devices that you have moved in from the outside (these sh

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-10-09 Thread Cameron Norman
El mié, 8 de oct 2014 a las 10:24 , Marcel Holtmann escribió: Hi Cameron, ifupdown [1], NetworkManager, and WICD all support hooks for when a network interface is configured or deconfigured (before and after these actions). Are there any plans to support something along these lines? If

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-10-08 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Cameron, > ifupdown [1], NetworkManager, and WICD all support hooks for when a > network interface is configured or deconfigured (before and after > these actions). > > Are there any plans to support something along these lines? If so, > what will that look like? >

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-10-08 Thread Cameron Norman
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 02.10.14 19:48, Cameron Norman (camerontnor...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> > Hi Cameron, >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Cameron Norman >> > wrote: >> >> ifupdown [1

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-10-08 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 02.10.14 19:48, Cameron Norman (camerontnor...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > > Hi Cameron, > > > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Cameron Norman > > wrote: > >> ifupdown [1], NetworkManager, and WICD all support hooks for when a > >> networ

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-10-03 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 2 okt. 2014, om 15:29 heeft Tom Gundersen het volgende geschreven: > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Lennart Poettering > wrote: >> On Thu, 02.10.14 13:00, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote: >> >>> >>> Op 2 okt. 2014, om 07:36 heeft Tom Gundersen het volgende >>> geschreven:

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-10-02 Thread Cameron Norman
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > Hi Cameron, > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Cameron Norman > wrote: >> ifupdown [1], NetworkManager, and WICD all support hooks for when a >> network interface is configured or deconfigured (before and after >> these actions). >> >> Are

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-10-02 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 02.10.14 13:00, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote: > >> >> Op 2 okt. 2014, om 07:36 heeft Tom Gundersen het volgende >> geschreven: >> >> > Hi Cameron, >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Cameron Norman >> > w

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-10-02 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 02.10.14 13:00, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote: > > Op 2 okt. 2014, om 07:36 heeft Tom Gundersen het volgende > geschreven: > > > Hi Cameron, > > > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Cameron Norman > > wrote: > >> ifupdown [1], NetworkManager, and WICD all support hooks

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-10-02 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 2 okt. 2014, om 07:36 heeft Tom Gundersen het volgende geschreven: > Hi Cameron, > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Cameron Norman > wrote: >> ifupdown [1], NetworkManager, and WICD all support hooks for when a >> network interface is configured or deconfigured (before and after >> these

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-10-01 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 01.10.14 21:36, Cameron Norman (camerontnor...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hello, > > ifupdown [1], NetworkManager, and WICD all support hooks for when a > network interface is configured or deconfigured (before and after > these actions). > > Are there any plans to support something along these

Re: [systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-10-01 Thread Tom Gundersen
Hi Cameron, On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Cameron Norman wrote: > ifupdown [1], NetworkManager, and WICD all support hooks for when a > network interface is configured or deconfigured (before and after > these actions). > > Are there any plans to support something along these lines? If so, > wh

[systemd-devel] [question] networkd: Any support for hooks?

2014-10-01 Thread Cameron Norman
Hello, ifupdown [1], NetworkManager, and WICD all support hooks for when a network interface is configured or deconfigured (before and after these actions). Are there any plans to support something along these lines? If so, what will that look like? If there are no plans, how do networkd's devel