2016-07-18 15:34 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
>
> I was told that this is already configurable in lxc via lxc.haltsignal.
> So afaics, lxc-create would just need to make sure to set this
> accordingly on distros which use systemd by default.
FYI: I've filed
On Mon, 18.07.16 15:17, Clemens Gruber (clemens.gru...@pqgruber.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 03:02:10PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Well, if they don't want to make SIGRTMIN+4 the default because they
> > think sysvinit/Upstart is more relevant than systemd, then that's
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 18.07.16 14:00, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2016-07-18 13:54 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
On Mon, 18.07.16 13:37, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
Apparently SIGPWR is used by lxc-stop to
2016-07-18 15:02 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> On Mon, 18.07.16 14:41, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> 2016-07-18 14:00 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
>> > 2016-07-18 13:54 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
>> >> On Mon,
On Mon, 18.07.16 14:51, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 2016-07-18 14:46 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> > I'd really recommend them to switch to SIGRMIN+4 instead. Redefining
> > the meaning of SIGPWR like they are doing is certainly a bad idea.
> >
> > Note
On Mon, 18.07.16 14:41, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 2016-07-18 14:00 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
> > 2016-07-18 13:54 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> >> On Mon, 18.07.16 13:37, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >>
> >>> Apparently
2016-07-18 14:00 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
> 2016-07-18 13:54 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
>> On Mon, 18.07.16 13:37, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>>> Apparently SIGPWR is used by lxc-stop to shut down LXC containers.
>>> What interface
2016-07-18 13:54 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> On Mon, 18.07.16 13:37, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Apparently SIGPWR is used by lxc-stop to shut down LXC containers.
>> What interface would you recommend instead?
>>
>>
On Mon, 18.07.16 13:37, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Apparently SIGPWR is used by lxc-stop to shut down LXC containers.
> What interface would you recommend instead?
>
> https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/2015-May/009279.html
Is that actually really used? I mean,
Apparently SIGPWR is used by lxc-stop to shut down LXC containers.
What interface would you recommend instead?
https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/2015-May/009279.html
2016-07-18 12:36 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> On Sat, 16.07.16 17:22, Christian
On Sat, 16.07.16 17:22, Christian Hofstaedtler (c...@zeha.at) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to understand how sigpwr.target is intended to be used,
> but couldn't find a good explanation. systemd.special says this
> target is invoked in a power fail situation, but what should happen
> then?
>
>
11 matches
Mail list logo