Re: [Tails-dev] Releasing automated tests

Hi, bertagaz wrote (03 Dec 2015 15:40:09 GMT) : > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:28:13PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: >> * the list of scenarios that shall be tagged @doc: at least the one >>anonym mentioned earlier in this thread; plus "check all PO files" >>I guess; the WhisperBack tests once

Re: [Tails-dev] Releasing automated tests

Hi, [too bad it's too late to rename this thread, now that there have been 6 replies, to it.] anonym wrote (21 Oct 2015 12:46:37 GMT) : >> FTR I dislike the idea of blacklisting such branches based on their >> name. I'm not going to debate it here [...] > Please do it here, then! :) I guess

Re: [Tails-dev] Releasing automated tests

Hi, anonym wrote (28 Oct 2015 16:52:31 GMT) : > Then I think we can combine the "..." operator with another fancy Git > feature I recently found, namely Git pathspec "magic signatures". So we > could do: >BASE_BRANCH_DIFF="$(git diff $base_branch...$commit -- \ >

Re: [Tails-dev] Releasing automated tests

Hi, sajolida wrote (22 Oct 2015 12:19:04 GMT) : >>> FTR I dislike the idea of blacklisting such branches based on their >>> name. I'm not going to debate it here [...] > The prefixes doc/ and web/ are used loosely to differentiate work on the > "documentation" (/doc /support) and the "website"

Re: [Tails-dev] Releasing automated tests

Hi, On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:38:00PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: > bertagaz wrote (18 Nov 2015 12:34:34 GMT) : > > Intrigeri, what's on your opinion on [...] > > Please give me an explicit deadline. I probably won't be able to work on it before week 49 anyway, so no rush, but an answer before

Re: [Tails-dev] Releasing automated tests

Hi, Sorry for the late reply. On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:52:31PM +, anonym wrote: > sajolida: > > anonym: > >> sajolida: > > From: intrigeri > > Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:08:31 +0200 > > > > FTR I dislike the idea of blacklisting such branches based on

Re: [Tails-dev] Releasing automated tests

bertagaz wrote (18 Nov 2015 12:34:34 GMT) : > Intrigeri, what's on your opinion on [...] Please give me an explicit deadline. Thanks for asking! ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe

Re: [Tails-dev] Releasing automated tests

anonym: > sajolida: >> anonym: >>> [Moving discussion to tails-dev@] >> >> Meta: I really don't want to understand everything that's in this email >> but I felt you would want me to answer this one. But if you think that >> you can have this discussion without me I would be super happy as well. >

Re: [Tails-dev] Releasing automated tests

sajolida: > anonym: >> sajolida: >>> anonym: [Moving discussion to tails-dev@] >>> >>> Meta: I really don't want to understand everything that's in this email >>> but I felt you would want me to answer this one. But if you think that >>> you can have this discussion without me I would be

[Tails-dev] Releasing automated tests

Hi, anonym: Neat! That's is a very useful Git feature. Thanks for letting me know about it! Then I think we can combine the "..." operator with another fancy Git feature I recently found, namely Git pathspec "magic signatures". So we could do: BASE_BRANCH_DIFF="$(git diff

Re: [Tails-dev] Releasing automated tests

sajolida: > anonym: >> [Moving discussion to tails-dev@] > > Meta: I really don't want to understand everything that's in this email > but I felt you would want me to answer this one. But if you think that > you can have this discussion without me I would be super happy as well. I believe you

Re: [Tails-dev] Releasing automated tests

anonym: > [Moving discussion to tails-dev@] Meta: I really don't want to understand everything that's in this email but I felt you would want me to answer this one. But if you think that you can have this discussion without me I would be super happy as well. > Given the trimming that has

Re: [Tails-dev] Releasing automated tests

[Moving discussion to tails-dev@] Given the trimming that has happened, some context may have been lost. The discussion is about that we now, in our Jenkins setup, automatically test images built from doc/ and web/ branches, which wastes a lot of time on our isotesters. > From: intrigeri