Re: [Tails-dev] Verification extension [was: HTML prototype for new download page]

2017-11-13 Thread Uzair Farooq
> But I don't see any new commit on your repo so maybe you forgot to push: We have pushed the missing changes. > Another bug I found today, when the verification fails for a second time, the 'verification-failed-again' message is not passed. We were working on this but can't seem to pass 'Instal

[Tails-dev] Electron Cash in Tails

2017-11-13 Thread Fidel Ramos
Hello everyone. This is my first message to this mailing list. I'm a Tails user, but I haven't contributed code before, just donations. As you may know Bitcoin Cash is a fork of Bitcoin that has been growing a lot, especially in the past few days. People (including me) have shown interest in ha

Re: [Tails-dev] Verification extension [was: HTML prototype for new download page]

2017-11-13 Thread sajolida
Uzair Farooq: >> But I don't see any new commit on your repo so maybe you forgot to > push: > > We have pushed the missing changes. I saw that! I'll test it today. >> Another bug I found today, when the verification fails for a second > time, the 'verification-failed-again' message is not passed

Re: [Tails-dev] Verification extension [was: HTML prototype for new download page]

2017-11-13 Thread sajolida
sajolida: > Uzair Farooq: >>> But I don't see any new commit on your repo so maybe you forgot to >> push: >> >> We have pushed the missing changes. > > I saw that! I'll test it today. The version check works now. Congrats! ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tai

[Tails-dev] VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2017-11-13 Thread segfault
Hi, we at Tails (tails.boum.org) currently work on integrating support for unlocking VeraCrypt (and probably also TrueCrypt) volumes in Tails via udisks2 and GNOME Disks (and maybe also GNOME Files and the GVfs monitor). We internally track the status of this work in [1] and [2]. Currently we are

Re: [Tails-dev] VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2017-11-13 Thread segfault
segfault: > Hi, > > we at Tails (tails.boum.org) currently work on integrating support for > unlocking VeraCrypt (and probably also TrueCrypt) volumes in Tails via > udisks2 and GNOME Disks (and maybe also GNOME Files and the GVfs > monitor). We internally track the status of this work in [1] and

Re: [Tails-dev] Verification extension [was: HTML prototype for new download page]

2017-11-13 Thread u
Hello! congrats on your work on the extension! I reviewed the code a little bit and I have some requests which should be fixed beofore the release please: - contentscript/verify.js: - fetchConf(): please wrap the regexps. - manifest.json: - "permissions": [ "http://*/*";, ->

Re: [Tails-dev] VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2017-11-13 Thread Bastien Nocera
Hey, On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 17:19 +0100, segfault wrote: > Hi, > > we at Tails (tails.boum.org) currently work on integrating support > for > unlocking VeraCrypt (and probably also TrueCrypt) volumes in Tails > via > udisks2 and GNOME Disks (and maybe also GNOME Files and the GVfs > monitor). We i

Re: [Tails-dev] VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2017-11-13 Thread segfault
Hey, thanks for the quick response! Bastien Nocera: > [...] > What UI differences would be needed to handle those different types of > encryption? I'm guessing none for handling encrypted disks, because the > UI should be pretty much the same as for the existing LVM based > encryption support. D

[Tails-dev] Review of verification-extension

2017-11-13 Thread u
Dear Uzair, so here is a more complete review of the extension. As said, I think there are two urgent matters: - manifest.json: - "permissions": [ "http://*/*";, -> please deactivate HTTP. We only want to download over HTTPS. - contentscript/verify.js: - fetchConf(): please w

Re: [Tails-dev] Verification extension [was: HTML prototype for new download page]

2017-11-13 Thread Uzair Farooq
>When the extension gets installed, the page is not updated to show "Verify download...". See this screencast: > https://dl.poivron.org/maad2a3jiuqdu3k3wjbf-dirqyvooctlkem57 > Uzair: Could you help me fix that? Is it something that should be fixed in the extension or on the page? Fixed, extensio