pers who are creating poor edits and will not communicate.https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=57918111#map=17/33.10686/-117.18078-Original Message-
From: Greg Morgan
Sent: Apr 23, 2018 11:10 AM
To: "ajt1...@gmail.com"
Cc: Talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscu
Hi,
Am 23.04.18 um 09:10 schrieb Greg Morgan:
Okay so Jack fully supports Nakaner. He reports that 6-8 users are
creating a mess in the Denver, Colorado area. If we look at the node that
Jack is pointing to, then we will see that Victoria1901,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Victoria1901 h
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 11:42 PM, ajt1...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On 23/04/2018 03:40, Jack Armstrong dan...@sprynet.com wrote:
>
> I fully support the efforts of Nakaner. There are 6-8 users creating a
> mess in the Denver, Colorado area.
>
>
> What'd really help matters would be if local mappers cou
On 23/04/2018 03:40, Jack Armstrong dan...@sprynet.com wrote:
I fully support the efforts of Nakaner. There are 6-8 users creating a
mess in the Denver, Colorado area.
What'd really help matters would be if local mappers could comment on
changesets by new mappers (both "good" and "bad"). I se
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 7:40 PM, Jack Armstrong dan...@sprynet.com <
jacknst...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> I fully support the efforts of Nakaner. There are 6-8 users creating a
> mess in the Denver, Colorado area.
>
> See here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=
> 5538075288#map=19/39.71967/-104
I fully support the efforts of Nakaner. There are 6-8 users creating a mess in the Denver, Colorado area.See here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=5538075288#map=19/39.71967/-104.98736-Original Message->From: EthnicFood IsGreat >Sent: Apr 22, 2018 11:28 PM>To: talk...@openstreetmap.
On Friday 20 April 2018, Clifford Snow wrote:
> [...]
>
> Nakaner post a changeset comment which impart said:
>
> you seem to be part of a paid/organized/commercial editing activity.
> We have been telling your workmates for more than one week that you
> must add a note to your profile page at open
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> On Friday 20 April 2018, Ian Dees wrote:
> >
> > I'd be interested in seeing all of these reverts reverted (at least
> > in the US) until discussion can take place.
>
> I don't know about these changes or the reverts of them in detail bu
On Friday 20 April 2018, Mikel Maron wrote:
>
> [...]Nakaner seems to be
> applying an organized editing policy here without grounds.
While you might think this is a good example for why such a policy is
needed it seems to me that the motivation for both the user blocks by
the DWG and the main a
> If mappers find edits they consider questionable - either factually or
>methodologically - and attempts to get in contact with the mapper making those
>edits fail it is commonly accepted practice that mappers can revert such
>changes
While that is somewhat correct (I question how common or acc
On Friday 20 April 2018, Ian Dees wrote:
>
> I'd be interested in seeing all of these reverts reverted (at least
> in the US) until discussion can take place.
I don't know about these changes or the reverts of them in detail but on
a general note here: If mappers find edits they consider
questi
11 matches
Mail list logo
