I meant, that the board hasn't decided how the board will
vote/appoint/choose the members of this panel.
On 05/08/2020 01:07, Christoph Hormann wrote:
On Tuesday 04 August 2020, Rory McCann wrote:
The Board hasn't decided on how the panel will be
formed/elected/appointed/choosen.
Quoting fro
On Tuesday 04 August 2020, Rory McCann wrote:
> The Board hasn't decided on how the panel will be
> formed/elected/appointed/choosen.
Quoting from the proposal:
> In appointing members of the Panel, the Board shall strive for Panel
composition (membership) that reflects [...]
Seems there are so
More seriously the line “all interests of the OSM community” was one we talked
a lot about on the board when writing this message, and had several versions,
and indeed we touched on how to best designate what was needed in composition
of the panel. I think it’s not possible to put together a spe
It was a joke more aimed at Rory and a continuation of the similar discussion
we’ve had on the board.
And yes I agree very much with the sentiment that we don’t want OSM to be
dominated by companies. or any single point of view for that matter.
I’ve come to not like that quote because I don’t bel
Re: "Rory, I don't know about you, but I'm certainly hoping for a bunch of
corporate sell outs rubber stamping iD decisions and squashing the common
mapper into conformity. Why else would we be doing this?"
This sarcastic comment is not a fair response to Christoph's concerns.
While we hope that
Mikel, I might be misunderstanding what you meant, but in my opinion
conformity is required for this type of project, and I do hope iD/JOSM/...
help us achieve that. To clarify:
* features with the same meaning (type) should be mapped the same way,
otherwise each consumer must understand all of th
Rory, I don't know about you, but I'm certainly hoping for a bunch of corporate
sell outs rubber stamping iD decisions and squashing the common mapper into
conformity. Why else would we be doing this?
On Tuesday, August 4, 2020, 04:37:00 PM EDT, Rory McCann
wrote:
The Board hasn't decide
The Board hasn't decided on how the panel will be
formed/elected/appointed/choosen. Just because the document doesn't
address one issue, doesn't mean the opposite, horrible option will
happen. Do you think I'm going to support some Old Boy's Network of
corporate employees?
What would you sugg
8 matches
Mail list logo