Hello John,
Monday, August 25, 2003, 8:31:10 PM, you wrote:
>> Could you post the headers of such a message here?
I received this mail. It was completely blank until I replied to it
and then everything appeared in the reply. Headers to follow
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, at 11:29:48 [GMT +0700] (which was 14:29 where I
live) you wrote:
> IOW it works perfectly over here.
Not here!
--
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1
Press any key to continue or any other key
Hello Alexander,
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:33:30 +0200 GMT (26/08/2003, 23:33 +0700 GMT),
Alexander wrote:
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="big5"
>> Traditional Chinese, as used in Taiwan and Hong Kong.
> I stand corrected (should've omitted the smiley). However, couldn't
> t
26-Aug-2003 17:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="big5"
>>> Hu, what charset is that? :-)
>> afaik it's an Asian charset...
> Traditional Chinese, as used in Taiwan and Hong Kong.
I stand corrected (should've omitted the smiley). However, couldn't
On Tuesday, August 26, 2003, 17:27:33, Alexander wrote:
>> Content-Type: text/plain;
>> charset="big5"
> Hu, what charset is that? :-)
Chinese Traditional
--
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/
http://deepthought.ena.si/
An inexorable upward movement lead
Hello Antje,
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:36:50 +0200 GMT (26/08/2003, 22:36 +0700 GMT),
Antje Lehmann wrote:
>>> Content-Type: text/plain;
>>> charset="big5"
>> Hu, what charset is that? :-)
> afaik it's an Asian charset...
Traditional Chinese, as used in Taiwan and Hong Kong.
--
Cheers,
Alexander,
>> Content-Type: text/plain;
>> charset="big5"
> Hu, what charset is that? :-)
afaik it's an Asian charset...
Antje
--
| Antje Lehmann
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information:
http:
25-Aug-2003 21:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="big5"
Hu, what charset is that? :-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)
Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://ww
Hello John,
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 05:31:10 +1000 GMT (26/08/2003, 02:31 +0700 GMT),
John Phillips wrote:
>> Could you post the headers of such a message here?
> Below. My mistake last e-mail. I can only see the mail (see below)
> in this post if pressing F9. (Last line)
I copied the whole mes
Hello John,
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 05:26:53 +1000 GMT (26/08/2003, 02:26 +0700 GMT),
John Phillips wrote:
>> Or are the messages maybe formatted in html using white text on a white
>> background?
> Why then would I see them on a reply?
TB generates a plain-text version of the HTML mail when you hi
On Monday, August 25, 2003, 3:26:53 PM, John Phillips wrote:
>> Or are the messages maybe formatted in html using white text on a
>> white background?
JP> Why then would I see them on a reply?
When you reply, it would be quoted in plain text :-)
--
Deborah
___
Hello John!
On Monday, August 25, 2003, 2:26 PM, you wrote:
D>> Are you, like another poster this morning, missing the tab at the bottom
D>> of the screen which allows you to view html?
J> Comes up if I receive HTML (shudder).
(shudder)
D>> Or are the messages maybe formatted in html using whi
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, at 22:27:21 [GMT +0700] (which was 01:27 where I
live) you wrote:
> Could you post the headers of such a message here?
Below. My mistake last e-mail. I can only see the mail (see below)
in this post if pressing F9. (Last line)
Received: from mail.rivernet.co
Hi Roelof,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, at 14:31:07 [GMT +0200] (which was 22:31 where I
live) you wrote:
> Might be that they're html only. If not, can you read them when you
> look for the source (Press F9)?
Only the source shows. Tried that as well!
--
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia
Using The
Hi Deborah,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, at 08:27:33 [GMT -0400] (which was 22:27 where I
live) you wrote:
> Are you, like another poster this morning, missing the tab at the bottom
> of the screen which allows you to view html?
Comes up if I receive HTML (shudder).
> Or are the messages maybe formatte
Hello John,
Monday, August 25, 2003, 6:23:28 AM, you wrote:
JP> How ever if I click on the "Reply" arrow, I can then read the mail.
I forgot to add that I can't read even if I hit reply or forward either. However,
when I get another e-mail from someone else who has replied to the original e-ma
Hello John,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:23:28 +1000 GMT (25/08/2003, 17:23 +0700 GMT),
John Phillips wrote:
> Some (rare) e-mails received are completely blank except for the
> header.
> How ever if I click on the "Reply" arrow, I can then read the mail.
Could you post the headers of such a message
Hello John,
Monday, August 25, 2003, 6:23:28 AM, you wrote:
JP> Hi Bat! Fans,
JP> Queer problem.
JP> Some (rare) e-mails received are completely blank except for the
JP> header.
JP> How ever if I click on the "Reply" arrow, I can then read the mail.
JP> Any clues?
I'm experiencing the same
Hallo John,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:23:28 +1000GMT (25-8-03, 12:23 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
JP> Some (rare) e-mails received are completely blank except for the
JP> header.
JP> How ever if I click on the "Reply" arrow, I can then read the mail.
Might be that they're html only. If not, can
On Monday, August 25, 2003, 6:23:28 AM, John Phillips wrote:
JP> Some (rare) e-mails received are completely blank except for the
JP> header.
JP> How ever if I click on the "Reply" arrow, I can then read the mail.
JP> Any clues?
Are you, like another poster this morning, missing the tab at the
Hi Bat! Fans,
Queer problem.
Some (rare) e-mails received are completely blank except for the
header.
How ever if I click on the "Reply" arrow, I can then read the mail.
Any clues?
--
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1
If at
21 matches
Mail list logo
