Re: MORE version questions

2004-09-04 Thread Andre Wichartz
Hello rich, On 3 Sep 2004 at 13:17:44 -0400 GMT [19:17 CEST] you wrote: rg> Anyone have comments on the 2.x versions at my (free) disposal? rg> 2.04.7 - the version I am (still) on rg> 2.11.02 - a version still available on the site for download rg> 2.12 - a version still available on the

Re: MORE version questions

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Rich! On Wednesday, September 01, 2004, 10:56 AM, you wrote: rg> 1) Anyone care to comment ... Well, I'll give it a try. Each person's needs and "compelling reasons" are different. It depends on what you want. I have run v. 2.12.00 and liked it very much, except for an unstable folder prob

Re: MORE version questions

2004-09-03 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo rich, On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 13:15:18 -0400GMT (3-9-2004, 19:15 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RO>> I think the improved filtering system is worth it. RG>>> 2) I am also interested in trying out v3 *BUT* if I do not like it is RG>>> there a sane roll-back method? RO>> As long as you don't cha

Re: MORE version questions

2004-09-02 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo rich, On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 11:56:03 -0400GMT (1-9-2004, 17:56 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RG> 1) Anyone care to comment on if they think there is compelling reason RG> to upgrade from the version of TB! I am still using to either of the 2 RG> available free 2.x upgrades? I think the imp