On 11/02/17 14:26, Reyk Floeter wrote:
Hi,
the problem got reported a few times and a similar diff was floating
around: vmd's "local interface" implements a simple auto-magic BOOTP
server, but udhcpc doesn't support BOOTP, which is the predecessor and
a valid subset of DHCP. udhcpc is used by b
This debug message has served its duty for finding bugs in
shutdown related issues.
Ok reyk@
diff --git usr.sbin/vmd/proc.c usr.sbin/vmd/proc.c
index afa9b223649..d223d6bcce2 100644
--- usr.sbin/vmd/proc.c
+++ usr.sbin/vmd/proc.c
@@ -756,8 +756,6 @@ proc_compose_imsg(struct privsep *ps, enum priv
Remove configuration items on switches for:
* adding static interfaces
Adding static interfaces are to be set in hostname.if.
Changed rule on rdomain:
* vm->interface->rdomain takes precedence over sw->rdomain
Update examples/vm.conf and vm.conf manpage to reflect changes.
Comments? Ok?
diff -
Update regression tests to match new switch configuration
diff --git regress/usr.sbin/vmd/config/Makefile
regress/usr.sbin/vmd/config/Makefile
index 2adc69ae491..3bf124aff56 100644
--- regress/usr.sbin/vmd/config/Makefile
+++ regress/usr.sbin/vmd/config/Makefile
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ VMD ?= /usr/sbin/v
This patch series makes the following changes to switch configuration:
* Removes adding static interfaces (done in /etc/hostname.if)
* vm->interface->rdomain take precedence over sw->rdomain
Updated regression tests to match vm.conf changes.
Updated examples/vm.conf to match vm.conf changes.
cha
We are processing Router Solicitation / Advertisement messages only
for the Source Link-layer Address Options.
Merge nd6_rs_input() and nd6_ra_input() into one generic function.
OK?
diff --git netinet6/icmp6.c netinet6/icmp6.c
index 421280690c9..b5e12169584 100644
--- netinet6/icmp6.c
+++ netinet
Hi,
the problem got reported a few times and a similar diff was floating
around: vmd's "local interface" implements a simple auto-magic BOOTP
server, but udhcpc doesn't support BOOTP, which is the predecessor and
a valid subset of DHCP. udhcpc is used by busybox and many embedded
Linux distributi
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 10:53:52AM -0700, Carlos Cardenas wrote:
> Removed configuration items on switches for:
> * adding interfaces
> * setting group
> * setting rdomain
>
> All of these items are now to be set in hostname.if and are
> queried by vmd for propagation to the vm's vif(s).
>
> Upda
This patch series finishes up the switch configuration to be
handled in hostname.if change.
It removes from switch configuration in vm.conf:
* adding interfaces (done in /etc/hostname.if)
* setting group(s) (done in /etc/hostname.if)
* setting rdomain (don in /etc/hostname.if)
vmd now queries the
Removed configuration items on switches for:
* adding interfaces
* setting group
* setting rdomain
All of these items are now to be set in hostname.if and are
queried by vmd for propagation to the vm's vif(s).
Update example vm.conf and vm.conf manpage to reflect changes.
Comments? Ok?
diff --g
Update regression tests to match new switch configuration
diff --git regress/usr.sbin/vmd/config/Makefile
regress/usr.sbin/vmd/config/Makefile
index 2adc69ae491..a337b816acc 100644
--- regress/usr.sbin/vmd/config/Makefile
+++ regress/usr.sbin/vmd/config/Makefile
@@ -5,7 +5,8 @@ VMD ?= /usr/sbin/v
This inlines all the trivial functions in the various places.
OK?
diff --git sys/conf/files sys/conf/files
index 03b4a0e24cc..2771b6f4446 100644
--- sys/conf/files
+++ sys/conf/files
@@ -788,7 +788,6 @@ file net/switchctl.cswitch
file net/switchofp.c swit
There is no way SS_NOFDREF is set on a raw socket in raw_usrreq for
PRU_DISCONNECT or PRU_ABORT.
So raw_disconnect() and sofree() return immediately so remove the dead
code.
Also the following call to soisdisconnected() would be a
use after free.
This removes the last calls to raw_disconnect() so
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 01:50:01PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017/11/02 14:29, Paul Irofti wrote:
> > Here is a backport from FreeBSD to support EVFILT_USER events.
>
> I can't comment on whether or not this should be added, but if it is, some
> ports
> will pick it up and need bumps:
>
On 28/10/17(Sat) 13:57, Helg Bredow wrote:
> [...]
> I've reverted fuse_loop_mt(). However, I don't feel that this is correct. If
> a file system expects it to work then it should fail to make it clear that
> the functionality is not implemented. sshfs calls it but because
> fuse_parse_cmdline(
On 2017/11/02 14:29, Paul Irofti wrote:
> Here is a backport from FreeBSD to support EVFILT_USER events.
I can't comment on whether or not this should be added, but if it is, some ports
will pick it up and need bumps:
devel/libinotify
devel/libivykis
net/ntp
sysutils/syslog-ng
telephony/asterisk
> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 14:29:30 +0200
> From: Paul Irofti
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is a backport from FreeBSD to support EVFILT_USER events.
>
> %---
> EVFILT_USEREstablishes a user event identified by ident which is
>
> Reducing kqueue(2) differences is IMHO good since it makes easier to
> port 3rd party software. However you forgot to mention why you want
> this. Which ports make use of that?
None at the moment. I am currently porting libudev from FreeBSD that
makes use of it.
> Do FreeBSD has regression te
On 02/11/17(Thu) 14:29, Paul Irofti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a backport from FreeBSD to support EVFILT_USER events.
> [...]
> I can split the diff in two if needed: first add the touch
> functionality and then the EVFILT_USER support on top.
>
> Thoughts?
Reducing kqueue(2) differences is IMHO
On 02/11/17(Thu) 09:06, Florian Obser wrote:
> this moves PRU_DETACH out of pr_usrreq into per proto pr_detach
> functions, like what claudio did to pr_attach.
>
> Intentionally mostly mechanical. There might be some cleanup here and
> there in the functions themselves.
I like it, comments inline
Hi,
Here is a backport from FreeBSD to support EVFILT_USER events.
%---
EVFILT_USER Establishes a user event identified by ident which is
not associated with any kernel mechanism but is trig-
Hi all,
So there's one OK - anyone else?
Would anyone be so kind as to commit it, please? :^)
Regards,
Raf
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 06:32:03PM BST, Alexander Hall wrote:
> I'm OK with this.
>
> /Alexander
>
>
> On October 23, 2017 3:29:57 PM GMT+02:00, Raf Czlonka
> wrote:
> >What say you?
this moves PRU_DETACH out of pr_usrreq into per proto pr_detach
functions, like what claudio did to pr_attach.
Intentionally mostly mechanical. There might be some cleanup here and
there in the functions themselves.
OK?
diff --git kern/uipc_proto.c kern/uipc_proto.c
index 1e86120f374..8797f0d632
23 matches
Mail list logo