On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 08:03:43PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> The documentation for the Linux pvclock is pretty sparse but I am
> pretty sure we want to use a monotonic base for ti_system_time. We
> also have a function for converting a timespec into a 64-bit count of
> nanoseconds we can use.
if a bridge checked the ipv4 checksum and it was good, we can avoid
checking it again in ip_input.
ok?
Index: ip_input.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet/ip_input.c,v
retrieving revision 1.361
diff -u -p -r1.361 ip_input.c
--- ip_i
The documentation for the Linux pvclock is pretty sparse but I am
pretty sure we want to use a monotonic base for ti_system_time. We
also have a function for converting a timespec into a 64-bit count of
nanoseconds we can use.
We may as well also use rdtsc_lfence() to ensure consistent behavior.
Martin Vahlensieck writes:
> Hi
>
> The grammar for lladdr of interfaces is according to the manpage:
>
> [locked] lladdr [etheraddr]
>
> This implies that `locked lladdr' is OK but looking at parse.y this
> does not seem to be the case. Making it optional would lead to a
> `lladdr' all by it
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 08:23:24AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> > On 1 Jun 2021, at 02:58, Visa Hankala wrote:
> >
> > This patch enables the pool cache feature on the knote pool to reduce
> > the overhead of knote management.
> >
> > Profiling done by mpi@ and bluhm@ indicate that the potent
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:24:01PM +0200, Josh wrote:
> thanks Otto for the dmesg.
>
> I'd like to get one B550 mobo as well. Which version of Gigabyte B550
> AORUS ELITE do you have exactly? ATX? mATX ?
> Most of them listed here[1] have either RLT8118 or RLT8125 chipset and
> re(4) doesn't list
Ping.
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 09:58:46AM +0200, Martin Vahlensieck wrote:
> Hi
>
> The grammar for lladdr of interfaces is according to the manpage:
>
> [locked] lladdr [etheraddr]
>
> This implies that `locked lladdr' is OK but looking at parse.y this
> does not seem to be the case. Making
On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 10:33:17AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> The socket flag SS_ASYNC is redundant with the socket buffer flag
> SB_ASYNC. Both are set & unset via FIOASYNC. So the diff below gets
> rid of SS_ASYNC.
>
> Checking states on socket buffers will help reduce the scope of the
>
The socket flag SS_ASYNC is redundant with the socket buffer flag
SB_ASYNC. Both are set & unset via FIOASYNC. So the diff below gets
rid of SS_ASYNC.
Checking states on socket buffers will help reduce the scope of the
NET_LOCK() when we'll introduce a socket buffer lock.
ok?
Index: kern/sys_s
Am Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 08:10:21PM +0100 schrieb Patrick Wildt:
> Hi,
>
> it seems like some eMMCs are not capable of doing 8-bit operation,
> even if the controller supports it. I was questioning our drivers
> first, but it looks like it's the same on Linux. In the case that
> 8-bit doesn't wor
10 matches
Mail list logo