Hi Theo,
> ?: could be used here:
>
> if (unveil("/", rflag ? "r" : "rwc") == -1)
> err(1, "unveil /");
Right, I find it a bit verbose too.
>> -/* Don't allow directory traversal. */
>> -if (strchr(devp, '/')) {
>> -
Hello,
I'm using rmt in combination with the -d option for remote dumps from
multiple machines. It works fine, but the limitation on forward slashes
fills my backup directory with hundreds of dumpfiles in only a month.
I'd like to keep this a bit more organized in subdirectories based on
device or
Hello Scott,
works fine here.
Regards,
Andre
OpenBSD 6.8-current (GENERIC.MP) #8: Fri Dec 4 10:21:19 CET 2020
an...@dev.stoe.be:/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 4278124544 (4079MB)
avail mem = 4133175296 (3941MB)
random: good seed from bootblocks
mpath0 at root
scsibus0 at mpat
Hello Scott,
I tested this with Hyper-V on Windows 10 and it works fine so far.
Regards,
Andre
OpenBSD 6.8-current (GENERIC.MP) #6: Thu Dec 3 12:54:46 CET 2020
an...@dev.stoe.be:/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 4278124544 (4079MB)
avail mem = 4133171200 (3941MB)
random: good se
Hello,
following patch fixes two manpage links that point to the wrong section.
Regards,
Andre
Index: faq/upgrade67.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/upgrade67.html,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -r1.9 upgrade67.html
--- faq/upg
Hello Nick,
> Those of us that don't worry about running out of inodes, we can
> set DF_FLAGS in /etc/daily.local to be whatever we want, in my
> case, I like "-hl" (currently, it's "-ikl")
I really like the idea, because getting human-readable numbers in the
report without replicating functional
On 04.10.2019 15:54, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> Thanks a lot for dmesgs. Do I understand correctly that paravirtualized
> disk and network work fine for you regardless of whether OpenBSD-current,
> attached one-liner diff or the linked larger diff are used?
>
> With best regards,
> Mike
I'm not sur
On 03.10.2019 02:13, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> And what about OpenBSD-current or an attached patch as opposed
> to the linked one?
>
> Please don't go half the way if you're willing to help us out,
> we'd like to make OpenBSD 6.6-release work in these setups
> especially since we believe that all it
On 01.10.2019 00:25, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've got a verbal report that Hyper-V guest services aren't attached
> on modern Windows 10 systems so I believe we should get this one-liner
> in before 6.6.
>
> FreeBSD revision 349856 adds another define for VMBus 5.0 but AFAICT
> it d
On 18.03.2019 20:49, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Andre Stoebe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I, too, would like to have a way of signing the gzip archive in a
>> reproducible way, so here's a diff that uses -n, similar to gzip(1).
>
> Thanks. I think it's more consiste
Hi,
I, too, would like to have a way of signing the gzip archive in a
reproducible way, so here's a diff that uses -n, similar to gzip(1).
However, if that's a bad idea, I'm fine with continuing to use an
unsigned gzip archive and creating a sigfile with signify.
Regards
Andre
Index: signify.1
11 matches
Mail list logo