co...@sdf.org writes:
> Hi folks,
>
> we're working on a drmkms update.
> I'm testing it on a Dell XPS 9550. It's a laptop with a Skylake CPU.
> It has a power button. The power button powers off, not reboot.
> This means the dmesg buffer gets wiped.
> No serial console as far as I know.
>
> Now
Date:Mon, 6 Aug 2018 07:06:42 +0800 (+08)
From:Paul Goyette
Message-ID:
| I looked into using bitstring(3) operations, but since that stuff "lives
| in" /usr/include/bitstring.h it wasn't clear if using it in kernel code
| would be appropriate.
Doesn't matter
On Sun, 5 Aug 2018, co...@sdf.org wrote:
Hi folks,
we're working on a drmkms update.
I'm testing it on a Dell XPS 9550. It's a laptop with a Skylake CPU.
It has a power button. The power button powers off, not reboot.
This means the dmesg buffer gets wiped.
No serial console as far as I know.
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Mon, 6 Aug 2018 05:07:03 +0800 (+08)
From:Paul Goyette
Message-ID:
| Or we could just leave things alone, and tolerate the "hack" that is
| currently being used.
Or there could just be a new 1 bit/syscall const data struc
Hi folks,
we're working on a drmkms update.
I'm testing it on a Dell XPS 9550. It's a laptop with a Skylake CPU.
It has a power button. The power button powers off, not reboot.
This means the dmesg buffer gets wiped.
No serial console as far as I know.
Now it reaches a point where the screen chan
Date:Mon, 6 Aug 2018 05:07:03 +0800 (+08)
From:Paul Goyette
Message-ID:
| Or we could just leave things alone, and tolerate the "hack" that is
| currently being used.
Or there could just be a new 1 bit/syscall const data struct that says whether
the original (a
On Sun, 5 Aug 2018, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 09:09:54PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
We could change syscall_establish() to install for both sys_nomodule or
sys_nosys entry points. But then we'd need to remember which value to
restore when syscall_disestablish() is called.
> On Aug 5, 2018, at 9:32 AM, Taylor R Campbell
> wrote:
>
> I propose we rename libkern's min/max to umin/umax. The names min and
> max invite general use like MIN and MAX, but these functions truncate
> their arguments to unsigned first. We also have imin/imax, lmin/lmax,
> and ulmin/ulma
I propose we rename libkern's min/max to umin/umax. The names min and
max invite general use like MIN and MAX, but these functions truncate
their arguments to unsigned first. We also have imin/imax, lmin/lmax,
and ulmin/ulmax.
This came to my attention while working on a drmkms update, where
Lin
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 09:09:54PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
> We could change syscall_establish() to install for both sys_nomodule or
> sys_nosys entry points. But then we'd need to remember which value to
> restore when syscall_disestablish() is called.
Change the API and make syscall_establis
On Sun, 5 Aug 2018, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 06:24:25AM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
The primary usage for this is for arch/usermode's syscallemu() which
(according to those working on arch/usermode) could be considered
"dangerous" and "should never be autoloaded. Having th
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 06:24:25AM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
> The primary usage for this is for arch/usermode's syscallemu() which
> (according to those working on arch/usermode) could be considered
> "dangerous" and "should never be autoloaded. Having this change will
> allow use of a "register
12 matches
Mail list logo