On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:14:02PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:06:08PM +, David Holland wrote:
> >
> > Does it matter? Is there a case where a driver's notion of MAXPHYS
> > should depend on anything other than the buses it's attached to?
>
> I see you say "
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:14:02PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> > Does it matter? Is there a case where a driver's notion of MAXPHYS
> > should depend on anything other than the buses it's attached to?
>
> I see you say "buses". So I assume you're taking into account funny
> constrain
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:06:08PM +, David Holland wrote:
>
> Does it matter? Is there a case where a driver's notion of MAXPHYS
> should depend on anything other than the buses it's attached to?
I see you say "buses". So I assume you're taking into account funny
constraints to do with bus
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 12:03:49PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> > > Aside from pseudodevices, do we have any devices which aren't children
> > > of mainbus? Some ports' use of obio seems like, perhaps, a
> > > candidate for
> > > this, but I have not started checking them all.
> >
>
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:52:38AM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2012, at 8:42 AM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
>
> > Aside from pseudodevices, do we have any devices which aren't children
> > of mainbus? Some ports' use of obio seems like, perhaps, a candidate for
> > this, but I have n
On Jun 5, 2012, at 8:42 AM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> Aside from pseudodevices, do we have any devices which aren't children
> of mainbus? Some ports' use of obio seems like, perhaps, a candidate for
> this, but I have not started checking them all.
directly or through parents?
Not all port
