Han The Thanh (of pdftex fame) did the work on this module.
Tom
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Tomas G. Rokicki wrote:
> Just so you know:
>
> the dvips in the pretest works *great* on the files that Karsten sent out.
> That new writet1 looks good! Who did the work?
>
> -tom
>
Just so you know:
the dvips in the pretest works *great* on the files that Karsten sent out.
That new writet1 looks good! Who did the work?
-tom
Howdy!
Yep, I do dvips. Can you send me the font? (And any other files.)
I'll take a look.
Tom, does the latest snapshot of tetex actually use the writet1
module to handle font subsetting in dvips? I wasn't aware that had
happened yet . . .
-tom
That should be
/Encoding 256 array
Sorry about the mix up...
Tom
>
> /Encoding 255 array
> 0 1 255 {1 index exch /.notdef put}
>
Hi Karsten,
I am CC'ing this to the tex-k mailing list.
To answer your question, Tom Rokicki is the official maintainer of
dvips(k).
To answer your question about the encoding problem:
Does the original Type 1 font you are subsetting (you wrote partially
encoded but I think you really meant su
Who is the one who currently maintains dvips? I have some trouble with
partially encoded fonts with non-standard encoding and late postscript
interpreters in recent hp printers.
unfortunately, I have no idea who is the current maintainer. ctan has
dvips versions up to 5.67, dvipsk to 5.78a, an
