Thomas Esser writes:
> I did not yet test Omega 1.11, but I think that 1.11 was used for the
> TeX Live 5 build.
yes
> Maybe, Sebastian et. al. can give some comments on
> the quallity of Omega 1.11.
the same as it always has been, ie completely unknown and probably
full of bugs. I do
> (Incidentally, the reason that I asked my earlier question was that I
> installed Omega 1.11 on our site recently, and was concerned that if it
> wasn't in teTeX, then maybe it was because it was a buggy version or
> something. With the second question about the contents of ftp.dante.de,
Well,
> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 06:46:50 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: omega 1.11 (was: PStricks)
>
> > ftp> cd tex-archive/systems/omega
> ...
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 ctan
Thomas does an excellent job by providing us with teTeX,
thank you!!!
Let's drop this subject now, please.
Rgds
Christian from Japan
Thomas Esser wrote (10/May/2000 06:46:50 +0200):
>
> > ftp> cd tex-archive/systems/omega
> ...
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 ctan staff 470398 Feb 2 12:45 web2
> ftp> cd tex-archive/systems/omega
...
> -rw-r--r-- 1 ctan staff 470398 Feb 2 12:45 web2c-7.3-omega-1.11.tar.gz
The same listing appears if you go directly to
ftp://ftp.cse.unsw.edu.au/pub/users/plaice/Omega/
We we have seen from my previous mail: web2c-7.3-omega-1.11.tar.gz was
n
> Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 07:14:07 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: PSTricks
>
> > Well, omega-1.11 arrived on CTAN (ctan.tug.org, to be exact) on 2 February
> > 2000. Is there any reason it did not appear in te
