In message <49e57132.3000...@rubidium.dyndns.org>, Magnus Danielson writes:
>b...@lysator.liu.se skrev:
>>> If you are in Scandinavia, the GPS birds will not spend much time (if
>>> any?) to the north of you. Slide 12 of
>>> http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~ecalais/teaching/geodesy/Satellite_orbits.pdf
>
b...@lysator.liu.se skrev:
>> If you are in Scandinavia, the GPS birds will not spend much time (if
>> any?) to the north of you. Slide 12 of
>> http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~ecalais/teaching/geodesy/Satellite_orbits.pdf
>> suggests that the most northerly orbital point is at the latitude of
>> Denmar
Chuck Harris wrote:
> Google wrecked dejanews in the spirit of political correctness,
> the nanny state, and trying to pretend that usenet is just a part
> of google groups. Erasing all of the email addresses, and other things.
Does anyone know exactly where (building, city, country, continent)
I was a hardcore dajanews user. I guess that I even know it by
that name would indicate that I was around back then.
Google wrecked dejanews in the spirit of political correctness,
the nanny state, and trying to pretend that usenet is just a part
of google groups. Erasing all of the email addres
This doesn't include your model #, but it may be of some help.
http://web.archive.org/web/20020903124352/http://www.procinst.com/voltavider.PDF
Ed
John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
> I just acquired a nice portable zener voltage reference with six-digit
> divider. It's a Julie Research Labs (JRL) "Vo
I just acquired a nice portable zener voltage reference with six-digit
divider. It's a Julie Research Labs (JRL) "Volt-A-Vider" model GTX-355.
There aren't many references to this device on the web, much less to
its manual.
Any chance someone here might have a manual, or a data sheet, or a
Rick
The following NIST paper indicates that the conventional wisdom on ECL
phase noise levels appear to be incorrect at least for some ECL divider
configurations:
http://www.am1.us/Papers/U11605%20Low%20Noise%20Synthesis-%20Walls.pdf
Waveform symmetry and low power supply noise seem to be very
Bruce Griffiths wrote:
> Some ECL devices have jitter specs in the 100 to 200fsec range.
> see:
> http://www.onsemi.com
>
This is misleading. While it is true that they have this
low jitter at multi-Gb/s rates, the jitter is much greater
than this at lower clock rates. At 10 MHz, ECL devices
> Google didn't do anything to usenet. They did provide a web based
> interface into usenet, and bought the dejanews archive of all
> non-binary groups.
>
If you were a hardcore DejaNews user, as I was, you were probably not very
happy with the way Google handled the archive and its user interfa
> Michael Sokolov skrev:
> > John Miles wrote:
> >
> >> Not everybody can stomach Google's perversion of Usenet (which
> admittedly
> >> was no small engineering feat in itself).
> >
> > Aren't there still non-Google ways of accessing Usenet?
>
> There is. Find the Wikipedia page for Usenet to fi
> If you are in Scandinavia, the GPS birds will not spend much time (if
> any?) to the north of you. Slide 12 of
> http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~ecalais/teaching/geodesy/Satellite_orbits.pdf
> suggests that the most northerly orbital point is at the latitude of
> Denmark.
With a decent antenna sitin
John Miles wrote:
>> At 12:29 PM 4/14/2009 , John Miles wrote:
>>> ... for those who would like to participate in HDL discussions
>> that aren't
>>> on-topic for existing lists:
>>>
>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HDLTalk
>>>
>>> Any VHDL or Verilog HDL-related topics are welcome.
>> How will thi
Michael Sokolov skrev:
> John Miles wrote:
>
>> Not everybody can stomach Google's perversion of Usenet (which admittedly
>> was no small engineering feat in itself).
>
> Aren't there still non-Google ways of accessing Usenet?
There is. Find the Wikipedia page for Usenet to find several suggest
John Miles wrote:
> Not everybody can stomach Google's perversion of Usenet (which admittedly
> was no small engineering feat in itself).
Aren't there still non-Google ways of accessing Usenet?
MS
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To u
>
> At 12:29 PM 4/14/2009 , John Miles wrote:
> >... for those who would like to participate in HDL discussions
> that aren't
> >on-topic for existing lists:
> >
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HDLTalk
> >
> >Any VHDL or Verilog HDL-related topics are welcome.
>
> How will this compare to comp.la
I believe it is to be ham or hobby oriented
Am I right ?
(If so some rewording of the list purpose
might be adequate... thinking out loud...)
Luis Cupido
ct1dmk.
Scott Newell wrote:
> At 12:29 PM 4/14/2009 , John Miles wrote:
>> ... for those who would like to participate in HDL discussions that
At 12:29 PM 4/14/2009 , John Miles wrote:
>... for those who would like to participate in HDL discussions that aren't
>on-topic for existing lists:
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HDLTalk
>
>Any VHDL or Verilog HDL-related topics are welcome.
How will this compare to comp.lang.verilog, comp.lang.
... for those who would like to participate in HDL discussions that aren't
on-topic for existing lists:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HDLTalk
Any VHDL or Verilog HDL-related topics are welcome.
To keep spammers away, new member signups require moderator approval. For
this reason, please indicat
> I had a look at it again... and I'd say it is more like 3 meters up from
> the chimney, but it is still 4 m up from the roof at the chimney so it is
> a bit hard to get to.
If you are in Scandinavia, the GPS birds will not spend much time (if
any?) to the north of you. Slide 12 of
http://web.i
19 matches
Mail list logo
