>snake oil service like webiron
A most excellent characterization!
As a sales maneuver WebIron has been grandstanding
for months saying that Tor operators are "unwilling
to cleanup" when they know full-well that tor operators
can not / should not filter traffic due to minor brute-
force login att
If this is a raspberry pi 2, set in Torrc: "NumCPUs 4"
What is your advertised bandwidth? I can personally say that a RPi2 has
no trouble moving 20Mbps, which would run you a ~50Mbps connection to
get that kind of utilization. If you're talking about a RPi1, you don't
have enough bandwidth dedicat
I agree. I just bin these, or send the standard "abuse" response
template, which includes a snippet about using a DNSBL.
On 10/20/2015 04:57 PM, AMuse wrote:
>
>
> The TOR directory of exit nodes is readily available for ISP's and
> website operators to apply in their filters. I don't see why
My understanding is that Raspberry Pis top out around 800kb/s. And the
floor for a relay to get much traffic is around 1.5Mb/s.
-V
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 at 20:08 Volker Mink wrote:
> -now without HTML-
>
> Hi Folks.
>
> Some Stats:
> fingerprint: E20FF09A9A800B16C1C7C16E8C0DF95F46F649B0
> cpu: 0.0
The TOR directory of exit nodes is readily available for ISP's and
website operators to apply in their filters. I don't see why them
putting the onus on tens of thousands of exit operators to exit-block
THEIR addresses is in any way reasonable.
On 2015-10-20 12:51, yl wrote:
> Hello,
> I rec
Hello yl,
I also got some reports from WebIron.
I also made some thoughts about blocking Tor from reaching some parts of
the internet and if it's agains the ethics of tor. I think that blocking
the destination for two weeks by an reject rule satisfies the "victim"
and your hoster thus helps preven
Hello,
I received an abuse email today from my hoster (several emails from
webiron in one email), typical automated abuse emails, not much
information.
However, they request, if the origin IP is a Tor exit, to block the full
/24 subnet. As they also state, they will not provide the full IP of
ther
Hi @all,
so I reviewed my whole ExitPolicy statements and now I understand the
probleme: The first rule match wins. And because traffic to port 80 was
accepted for every source the reject rule for the subnet was ignored.
Thanks for the hint!
~Josef
Am 19.10.2015 um 23:43 schrieb teor:
>> On 20 O
-now without HTML-
Hi Folks.
Some Stats:
fingerprint: E20FF09A9A800B16C1C7C16E8C0DF95F46F649B0
cpu: 0.0% tor, 12.3% arm mem: 149 MB (34.4%) pid: 2200
cpu: 20.0% tor, 10.2% arm mem: 149 MB (34.4%) pid: 2200
load average: 0,30, 0,36, 0,33
%Cpu(s): 18,0 us, 3,1 sy, 0,0 ni, 75,3 id, 0,2 wa,
Hi Folks.
Some Stats:
fingerprint: E20FF09A9A800B16C1C7C16E8C0DF95F46F649B0
cpu: 0.0% tor, 12.3% arm mem: 149 MB (34.4%) pid: 2200
cpu: 20.0% tor, 10.2% arm mem: 149 MB (34.4%) pid: 2200
load average: 0,30, 0,36, 0,33
%Cpu(s): 18,0 us, 3,1 sy, 0,0 ni, 75,3 id, 0,2 wa, 0,0 hi, 3,5
10 matches
Mail list logo