In general, Tor Browser doesn't write any history to disk - by design.
If you look in about:config at settings whether to use disk cache, it
should be set to false.
browser.cache.disk.enable;false
If you have enough RAM, you can do the same in regular Firefox. Allow
enough memory to handle
On 10/12/2018 01:47 PM, Nick Levinson wrote:
>> This is the use case for Tails. . . . [T]here are no writes to storage,
>> unless users configure [otherwise] . . . .
>
> One need not use Tails to use Tor (I used to sometimes use Tor and never used
> Tails), so, while Tails may be a good idea,
add the updated tests , the wiki even accept anonymous edits.
you can discuss that openly in the forum of Whonix as well.
(though, i dont see much changes that would make Tor safer only through
the amnesic usage)
intrigeri:
> bo0od:
>> There is a full comparison of Tails and Whonix (persistent
bo0od:
> There is a full comparison of Tails and Whonix (persistent virtual OS)
> can be found here:
> https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Comparison_with_Others#Introduction
FTR the Tails part of that page is quite outdated.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or
Not really Tor is the best practice using it with amnesic system like
Tails due to the guards entry issue ..
There is a full comparison of Tails and Whonix (persistent virtual OS)
can be found here:
Clearnet Link:-
https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Comparison_with_Others#Introduction
Onion Link:-
On 10/05/2018 05:19 PM, Nick Levinson wrote:
> This replies to a September 26 post with the same title.
> It took some effort to find the bug in FF, it took some more effort
> to convince people at FF that data is persistently stored, and a FF
> derivative is being used in Tor, so I would not
Sorry for this (one) top post - just wanted you & any others new to the
Tor Browser & the whole family of software from Tor Project, not to be
misinformed.
You cited a cookie or history issue in Firefox. You expected Firefox
history - accumulated during NON-private browsing, to be
On Tuesday, September 25, 2018, 2:01:04 AM EDT, Joe wrote:
> * * * * *> Is the claim that Firefox (vs. TorBrowser, based on Firefox esr
version) stores visited URLs in places.sqlite regardless of settings under >
Privacy & Security? > The subject of this message is confusing. Is it asking
