JJZolx wrote:
> Why would anyone need to do that? They either sound good or they don't.
Completely Agree !!
Cut-Throat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=43167
View this thread: http://forums.slimd
Cut-Throat wrote:
> You need to spend a little time researching on how your recordings were
> made in the first place, not at how many bits that were stored and
> streamed to your stereo.
Why would anyone need to do that? They either sound good or they don't.
--
JJZolx wrote:
> (The sound you hear is that of Cut-Throat's audiophile stripes being
> ripped from his uniform.)
>
> You hear no difference between high bitrate Mp3 and lossless, yet you
> bother with software tweaks?
> .
It doesn't matter how high the bitrate is if it is a poorer quality
recor
It plays them directly. No conversion. I like MOG too and use it. but I
have thousands of CDs that are not available in MOG.
garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325
View this thread: http://f
Cut-Throat wrote:
> 320 kbps and sounds as good as my ripped CDs in lossless.
(The sound you hear is that of Cut-Throat's audiophile stripes being
ripped from his uniform.)
You hear no difference between high bitrate Mp3 and lossless, yet you
bother with software tweaks?
> My question is; Does
I think MOG may be the best source I've ever had for music. If I would
have known about this, I think I may have just skipped ripping my CDs. I
now have over 1 million Albums in the cloud. All for $5 a month for my
Touch. MOG streams a 320 kbps and sounds as good as my ripped CDs in
lossless. They
