On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 16:45 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> Regarding 512x psc register maps:
>
> The register map for 5125 does not just change the size of the registers.
> Some registers change locations. The issue is that the hardware guys
> decided to "fix" the old broken register access. The 520
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 15:54 +0200, Fortini Matteo wrote:
> Yes, that's what we're currently using, but the problem is a little
> broader: I should answer to CAN messages in at most 100-200ms from
> powerup, and that can be done in u-boot.
if you are in that interval you definitely need to go to
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 07:47 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Scott,
>
> In message <20090728225244.ga8...@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
> >
> > The patch title is bad -- it's not disabling warnings, it's disabling an
> > aspect of C99 that the code is incompatible with (and which is pr
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 21:06 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kumar Gala,
>
> In message <1247495041-8605-3-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org> you
> wrote:
> > The version of dlmalloc we are using generates a fair number of warnings
> > of the following form:
> >
> > warning: dereferenci
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 20:01 +0530, Aggrwal Poonam-B10812 wrote:
> > > I could not understand common/memsize.c, how it works?
> >
> > It writes markers at specific memory locations and then reads
> > these back. The algorithm is chosen to be fast but still to
> > be able to detect mirrored addres
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 12:00 -0400, jeffery palmer wrote:
> There are quite a few additions you can achieve with a TCP stack but of
> course it needs to be very clean and well tested.
>
http://www.sics.se/~adam/uip/uip-1.0-refman/
I used it before on a small arm platform (small =16k ram) and us
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 17:59 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kenneth Johansson,
>
> In message <1244733541.4182.81.ca...@localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
> >
> > > > ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE are set and exported
> > > > (ARCH=ppc, CROSS_COMPILE=p
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 17:04 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear cmfai...@rockwellcollins.com,
>
> In message
>
> you wrote:
> >
> > ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE are set and exported
> > (ARCH=ppc, CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux-)
>
> ...which is plain wrong. "powerpc-linux-" is NOIT a legal setting for
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 06:15 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 December 2008 05:06:51 kenneth johansson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 04:46 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > i.e. drop all of the $(AR) calls in board/*/Makefile and replace it with
> > >
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 04:46 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i dont really like how the changes are integrated. it'll require constant
> maintenance to add these QUIET prefix vars. is there a reason we cant go the
> opposite direction and set CC/etc... directly ? or try unifying things with
> p
On Tue, 2008-12-30 at 23:14 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear kenneth johansson,
>
> In message <1230636057.17914.5.ca...@duo> you wrote:
> >
> > Only print out the target name during make.
> > For old style set V=1
>
> What is the rationale for this
Only print out the target name during make.
For old style set V=1
Signed-off-by: kenneth johansson
---
actual patch at
http://www.4shared.com/file/78174399/3496e05d/0001-make-make-quiet.html
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http
On Tue, 2008-12-30 at 11:48 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear kenneth johansson,
>
> In message <1230625526.12143.24.ca...@duo> you wrote:
> >
> > For size reason this is a binary attachment. it uncompress to
> > 244227 bytes and max for this list is 10
Only print out the target name during make.
For old style set V=1
Signed-off-by: kenneth johansson
---
For size reason this is a binary attachment. it uncompress to
244227 bytes and max for this list is 100k
0001-make-make-quiet.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
make.
For old style set V=1
Signed-off-by: kenneth johansson
---
Makefile | 34
api/Makefile |2 +-
api_examples/Makefile |2 +-
board/AtmarkTechno/suzaku/Makefile|2 +-
board/BuS/EB+MCF
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 22:41 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear "John Rigby",
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > I'm not sure this right way to deal with this. Even with the modified
> > offset the 1.5 silicon linux nand driver will not work correctly with
> > the 2.0 silicon nand
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 19:00 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Kenneth Johansson wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 18:23 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >
> > > I cannot think of any such examples... I know access-types can
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 18:23 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> I cannot think of any such examples... I know access-types can be changed
> on the hardware, say, on a 16-bit bus a 32-bit access can be split into
> two 16-bit accesses, but I currently cannot think of any examples of the
> com
18 matches
Mail list logo
