Dear Kyle Moffett,
In message <1324487292-7299-2-git-send-email-kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com> you
wrote:
> The FAT filesystem code currently ends up requiring that the partition
> table be a DOS MBR, as it checks for the DOS 0x55 0xAA signature on the
> partition table (which may be Mac, EFI, ISO966
Dear Kyle Moffett,
In message <1324487292-7299-2-git-send-email-kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com> you
wrote:
> The FAT filesystem code currently ends up requiring that the partition
> table be a DOS MBR, as it checks for the DOS 0x55 0xAA signature on the
> partition table (which may be Mac, EFI, ISO966
The FAT filesystem code currently ends up requiring that the partition
table be a DOS MBR, as it checks for the DOS 0x55 0xAA signature on the
partition table (which may be Mac, EFI, ISO9660, etc) before actually
computing the partition offset.
This fixes support for accessing a FAT filesystem in
3 matches
Mail list logo