[Bug 920324] Re: Please merge mdadm 3.2.3-2 from Debian unstable (main) (multiple regressions)

2012-03-17 Thread nutznboltz
OMG! Service with a :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920324 Title: Please merge mdadm 3.2.3-2 from Debian unstable (main) (multiple regressions) To manage notifications about this

[Bug 920324] Re: Please merge mdadm 3.2.3-2 from Debian unstable (main) (multiple regressions)

2012-03-16 Thread nutznboltz
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #651880 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651880 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #645563 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645563 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #641584 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr

Re: [Bug 920324] Re: Please merge mdadm 3.2.3-2 from Debian unstable (main) (multiple regressions)

2012-03-16 Thread nutznboltz
Eh? Speak up boy, no one's listening to this old bug report, sonny. From: John Center To: kstai...@yahoo.com Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 2:58 PM Subject: [Bug 920324] Re: Please merge mdadm 3.2.3-2 from Debian unstable (main) (multiple regressions) I just i

[Bug 926350] Re: LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11

2012-02-23 Thread nutznboltz
The DEP-5 specification v1.0 was released on Monday February 22, 2012 as part of debian-policy_3.9.3.0_all.deb -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926350 Title: LDAP account via SSL cannot

[Bug 926350] Re: LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11

2012-02-22 Thread nutznboltz
DEP-5: Patches pushed to the Debian Policy repository http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2012/02/msg00078.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926350 Title: LDAP account via SSL can

[Bug 926350] Re: LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11

2012-02-21 Thread nutznboltz
I'm beginning to suspect that the best answer is to not ask any more questions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926350 Title: LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnut

[Bug 926350] Re: LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11

2012-02-21 Thread nutznboltz
ubuntu-treblig: when you can answer my question then I will be able to answer yours. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926350 Title: LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until

[Bug 926350] Re: LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11

2012-02-21 Thread nutznboltz
ubuntu-treblig: go to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls26/+bug/926350 and search for: Colin Watson: Needs Information on 2012-02-11 then explain just how that information will be provided. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 926350] Re: LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11

2012-02-21 Thread nutznboltz
Let me see if I understand. The reason this bug is not going to be fixed is: * Only some of the software distributed by Debian and Canonical under the GNU General Public License Version 2 includes a clause that says you can use future versions of that license AND * Some of the libraries have co

[Bug 931806] Re: linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-13.56~lucid1 -proposed tracker

2012-02-21 Thread nutznboltz
uname -srvm Linux 2.6.38-13-server #56~lucid1-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 14 03:35:38 UTC 2012 x86_64 apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.38-13-server linux-image-2.6.38-13-server: Installed: 2.6.38-13.56~lucid1 Candidate: 2.6.38-13.56~lucid1 Version table: *** 2.6.38-13.56~lucid1 0 400 http:/

[Bug 934650] Re: oneconf-query crashed with ImportError in /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/oneconf/packagesethandler.py: No module named distributor

2012-02-17 Thread nutznboltz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 934624 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934624 ** Attachment added: "xdpyinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934650/+attachment/2751000/+files/xdpyinfo.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 931806] Re: linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-13.56~lucid1 -proposed tracker

2012-02-16 Thread nutznboltz
Turns out that this is not an issue. The behavior is the same as the previous kernel. What I was missing is that custom firewall rules I did not know about were added to the servers. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. ht

[Bug 931806] Re: linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-13.56~lucid1 -proposed tracker

2012-02-16 Thread nutznboltz
I made a copy of linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-13.56~lucid1 into https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/lp-931806-testing and installed that on a KVM server. by default now: net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables = 1 VM guest is firewalled off, can only reach the VM host. If I run: $ sudo

[Bug 932889] Re: Missing build dependency for libvirt-bin: libgcrypt11-dev

2012-02-16 Thread nutznboltz
@serge-hallyn Thanks for opening the Debian bug report. I was going to do it when I got back to where I have a Debian VM that can send SMTP. Also the reason I use gnutls with nettle not libgcrypt is stated in LP: #926350 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 932889] Re: Missing build dependency for libvirt-bin: libgcrypt11-dev

2012-02-15 Thread nutznboltz
The reason I know this is I am running gnutls26 with libnettle4. Thanks for fixing it here too. ** Description changed: The libvirt-bin ("libvirt") package will not compile until the libgcrypt11-dev package is installed but running "apt-get build-dep libvirt-bin" does not install the libgc

[Bug 932889] [NEW] Missing build dependency for libvirt-bin: libgcrypt11-dev

2012-02-15 Thread nutznboltz
Public bug reported: The libvirt-bin ("libvirt") package will not compile until the libgcrypt11-dev package is installed but running "apt-get build-dep libvirt-bin" does not install the libgcrypt11-dev package because the libvirt package debian/control file does not include it as a build dependenc

[Bug 926350] Re: LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11

2012-02-10 Thread nutznboltz
** Description changed: == Regression details == - Discovered in version: 12.04 LTS - Last known good version: depends. 9.04 Jaunty the last one before a work-around became necessary. 11.10 was the last one that worked when you used the work-around. + Discovered in version: 2.12.14-5ubuntu2 (U

[Bug 926350] Re: LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11

2012-02-10 Thread nutznboltz
** Description changed: + == Regression details == + Discovered in version: 12.04 LTS + Last known good version: depends. 9.04 Jaunty the last one before a work-around became necessary. 11.10 was the last one that worked when you used the work-around. + If your account is an LDAP one and your

[Bug 926350] Re: LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11

2012-02-10 Thread nutznboltz
Added regression-release tag based on advice in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/RegressionTracking ** Tags added: regression-update ** Tags removed: regression-update ** Tags added: regression-release -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 920324] Re: Please merge mdadm 3.2.3-2 from Debian unstable (main) (multiple regressions)

2012-02-09 Thread nutznboltz
Successful reboot of a second system, this one has ext2 /boot on RAID-1 md0 and LVM on RAID-0 md1 $ cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid0] [raid1] md1 : active raid0 sda2[0] sdb2[1] 1953130496 blocks super 1.2 512k chunks md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[1] 194548 blocks supe

[Bug 920324] Re: Please merge mdadm 3.2.3-2 from Debian unstable (main) (multiple regressions)

2012-02-08 Thread nutznboltz
I have a server running with the 3.2.3-2 from my PPA now. $ lsb_release -ds Ubuntu precise (development branch) $ uname -srvi Linux 3.2.0-14-generic #23-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 3 23:17:59 UTC 2012 x86_64 $ ps ax | grep mdadm | grep -v grep 15618 ?Ss 0:00 /sbin/mdadm --monitor --pid-file /

[Bug 920324] Re: Please sync mdadm 3.2.3-2 from Debian unstable (main) (multiple regressions)

2012-02-08 Thread nutznboltz
PPA of mdadm 3.2.3-2 for Ubuntu 12.04 https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/mdadm-3.2.3-2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920324 Title: Please sync mdadm 3.2.3-2 from Debian

[Bug 920324] Re: Please sync mdadm 3.2.3-2 from Debian unstable (main) (multiple regressions)

2012-02-08 Thread nutznboltz
** Summary changed: - Please sync mdadm 3.2.3-2 from Debian unstable (main) (was: /etc/cron.daily/mdadm fails if mdadm monitor daemon is already running) + Please sync mdadm 3.2.3-2 from Debian unstable (main) (multiple regressions) ** Description changed: + Looking at the list of fixes upgradi

[Bug 920324] Re: Please sync mdadm 3.2.3-2 from Debian unstable (main) (was: /etc/cron.daily/mdadm fails if mdadm monitor daemon is already running)

2012-02-08 Thread nutznboltz
** Description changed: Reproducing: 1. Install Ubuntu 12.04 with md raid. My system has: $ cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] md1 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0]   522048 blocks [2/2] [UU] md0 : ac

[Bug 920324] Re: /etc/cron.daily/mdadm fails if mdadm monitor daemon is already running

2012-02-07 Thread nutznboltz
Title was updated based on advice in: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages ** Description changed: Reproducing: 1. Install Ubuntu 12.04 with md raid. My system has: - $ cat /proc/mdstat - Personalities : [raid1] [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4

[Bug 920324] Re: /etc/cron.daily/mdadm fails if mdadm monitor daemon is already running

2012-02-07 Thread nutznboltz
** Description changed: + Reproducing: + + 1. Install Ubuntu 12.04 with md raid. + + My system has: + + $ cat /proc/mdstat + Personalities : [raid1] [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] + md1 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0] + 522048 blocks [2/2] [UU] + +

[Bug 920324] Re: /etc/cron.daily/mdadm fails if mdadm monitor daemon is already running

2012-02-07 Thread nutznboltz
** Summary changed: - noise from /etc/cron.daily/mdadm + /etc/cron.daily/mdadm fails if mdadm monitor daemon is already running -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920324 Title: /etc/cron

[Bug 926350] Re: LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11

2012-02-07 Thread nutznboltz
That was with the libgcrypt11 GnuTLS package (2.12.14-5ubuntu2). Once I switch back to a GnuTLS with nettle then sssd works, supporting sudo. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926350 Titl

[Bug 926350] Re: LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11

2012-02-07 Thread nutznboltz
I tried installing sssd and the error message only prints the first line: $ sudo id sudo: setresuid(ROOT_UID, ROOT_UID, ROOT_UID): Operation not permitted The sssd.conf file is a copy of one that works on CentOS 6. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 926350] Re: LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11

2012-02-05 Thread nutznboltz
Debian bug for this issue: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658739 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #658739 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658739 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2012-02-05 Thread nutznboltz
This will never be fixed in Lucid and Lucid has the "use nscd" work- around. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252 Title: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo,

[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2012-02-04 Thread nutznboltz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 926350 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926350 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 926350 LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11 -- You received this bug notification because y

[Bug 509734] Re: initgroups() fails when using libnss-ldap (but not nscd)

2012-02-04 Thread nutznboltz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 926350 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926350 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 423252 NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 926350 LDAP account

[Bug 926350] Re: LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11

2012-02-04 Thread nutznboltz
@ubuntu-treblig I do so appreciate your wisdom. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926350 Title: LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle no

[Bug 926350] Re: LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11

2012-02-03 Thread nutznboltz
PPA with patch for the benefit of other affected people: https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/gnutls26-with-nettle ** Description changed: If your account is an LDAP one and your LDAP client connects to its LDAP server via SSL then running setuid programs from your account fail since

[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2012-02-03 Thread nutznboltz
I meant to type "no longer pertains to me" not "to be". I am unsubscribing from this bug report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252 Title: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applica

[Bug 926350] Re: LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11

2012-02-03 Thread nutznboltz
** Description changed: If your account is an LDAP one and your LDAP client connects to its LDAP server via SSL then running setuid programs from your account fail since libgcrypt11 is horribly broken and upstream GnuTLS no longer recommends using it as the backend crypto library: http://li

[Bug 926350] [NEW] LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11

2012-02-03 Thread nutznboltz
Public bug reported: If your account is an LDAP one and your LDAP client connects to its LDAP server via SSL then running setuid programs from your account fail since libgcrypt11 is horribly broken and upstream GnuTLS no longer recommends using it as the backend crypto library: http://lists.deb

[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2012-02-03 Thread nutznboltz
This bug no longer pertains to be as it is opened against libgcrypt11 now and to me this is now a GnuTLS backend selection bug. I put the patched gnutls into this PPA as my preferred solution. https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/gnutls26-with-nettle -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2012-02-03 Thread nutznboltz
According to Andreas Metzler http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2011/02/msg6.html {{ GnuTLS upstream has added support for different crypto backends in 2.11.x and has chosen nettle as prefered backend (2.10.x is using libgcrypt). }} I have started to experiment with using a gnutls26 package

[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2012-02-03 Thread nutznboltz
PPA for the patch suggested by Howard Chu's in comment #73 https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/howard-chu-libgcrypt11-patch- for-ldap-clients -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 902722] Re: Critical error on update (ia32-libs-multiarch:i386)

2012-01-30 Thread nutznboltz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 900512 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/900512 @kensay-kavi you need to run: apport-collect 902722 to complete this bug report. Otherwise it's dead. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 900512 ia32-libs-multiarch:i386 is not installable -

[Bug 563895] Re: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists

2012-01-30 Thread nutznboltz
Thanks Colin Watson, you do such great work! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895 Title: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists To manage notifications about thi

[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2012-01-24 Thread nutznboltz
** Tags added: precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252 Title: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd To manage notifications abo

[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2012-01-24 Thread nutznboltz
I tested with Ubuntu 12.04 today and the nscd work-around no longer works. The failure occurs with or without running nscd on Ubuntu 12.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252 Title:

[Bug 563895] Re: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists

2012-01-24 Thread nutznboltz
Oh, right after I wrote that I remembered LP: #623609 Does 1.98-1ubuntu13 fix that? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895 Title: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot ex

[Bug 563895] Re: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists

2012-01-24 Thread nutznboltz
@Colin: that will not work for /dev/vda on Ubuntu 10.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895 Title: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists To manage notificatio

[Bug 563895] Re: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists

2012-01-21 Thread nutznboltz
@dblade it's the price that you pay for not doing the SRU work yourself. The reward for being the one to do the work is that you don't have to listen to the ones who are doing it for you. Why not spend some time learning how to do the work? I have some information for you: http://www.youtube.com/

[Bug 563895] Re: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists

2012-01-20 Thread nutznboltz
The system rebooted with the snapshot. Everything works. Thanks. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895 Title:

[Bug 563895] Re: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists

2012-01-20 Thread nutznboltz
nutz@lp-563895:~$ sudo lvcreate -s -l 437 /dev/vg0/lv0 Logical volume "lvol0" created nutz@lp-563895:~$ sudo vgs VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree vg01 3 1 wz--n- 6.00g0 nutz@lp-563895:~$ sudo lvs LVVG Attr LSize Origin Snap% Move Log Copy% Convert lv0 vg0 ow

[Bug 563895] Re: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists

2012-01-20 Thread nutznboltz
> Why aren't they testing now? What could be wrong? Wait! Maybe it's that they are all stupid! Yeah, that's it they're too stupid to test. Don't worry stupid people, I'll do your testing for you. nutz@lp-563895:~$ apt-cache policy grub-pc grub-pc: Installed: 1.98-1ubuntu13 Candidate: 1.98-1

[Bug 563895] Re: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists

2012-01-20 Thread nutznboltz
The following non-developers have made comments in this bug indicating they understand at least a little bit about this problem: * https://launchpad.net/~alvind * https://launchpad.net/~nigelbabu * https://launchpad.net/~listmail * https://launchpad.net/~berni * https://launchpad.net/~bugs-sehe *

[Bug 563895] Re: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists

2012-01-20 Thread nutznboltz
Sorry, Colin, it's not about you. I'll explain later if I get the chance. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895 Title: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists To

[Bug 563895] Re: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists

2012-01-20 Thread nutznboltz
Interesting dates in the life of LP: #563895 March 21, 2010 - Reported as Debian #574863 April 4, 2010 (elapsed 14 days) Reported as LP: #563895 June 2, 2010 (elapsed 73 days) Fix committed into Debian and Debian bug closed. July 5, 2010 (elapsed 106 days) Fix committed in Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick)

[Bug 639712] Re: PCI Pass Through via libvirt cannot remap IRQ's

2012-01-17 Thread nutznboltz
allow_unsafe_assigned_interrupts=1 does work: $ grep QEMU /proc/cpuinfo model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.0 model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.0 $ lspci | grep Fun 00:05.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82576 Virtual Function (rev 01) -- You received this bug notif

[Bug 639712] Re: PCI Pass Through via libvirt cannot remap IRQ's

2012-01-17 Thread nutznboltz
I'm trying with 12.04 LTS KVM host and guest. RHEL 6 documentation says: {{ Secure device assignment also requires interrupt remapping support. If a platform does not support interrupt remapping, device assignment will fail. To use device assignment without interrupt remapping support in a develop

[Bug 790201] Re: Cannot use SR-IOV feature of Intel 82576 network card

2012-01-17 Thread nutznboltz
Works! 1. install 12.04 LTS (no PPA's or other modifications) 2. configure igb via /etc/modprobe.d/igb.conf contains: options igb max_vfs=7 /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-igbvf.conf blacklist igbvf 3. put those configuration files in the initrd sudo update-initramfs -k all -t -u 4. reboot 5. l

[Bug 790201] Re: Cannot use SR-IOV feature of Intel 82576 network card

2012-01-17 Thread nutznboltz
@Sergey Svishchev (svs) Seems I should have read your comments more closely. I just noticed the part about blacklisting the igbvf module, so it won't attach to VF devices. I will test that on 12.04 soon. My PPA: https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/kvm-libvirt-lts did get updat

[Bug 790201] Re: Cannot use SR-IOV feature of Intel 82576 network card

2012-01-13 Thread nutznboltz
The OP has "redhat-bugs #652210" as the Red Hat bug but that is wrong. That one was closed with "Status: CLOSED NOTABUG " This one is much more interesting: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523341 I think the story is: 1. BIOS doesn't know about SR-IOV Virtual Functions so it does no

[Bug 790201] Re: Cannot use SR-IOV feature of Intel 82576 network card

2012-01-13 Thread nutznboltz
There is a possibility that a necessary patch (based on a statement by Linus) was vetoed by Bjorn Helgaas bjorn.helgaas@hp@ com Start of thread: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128392923724817&w=2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 790201] Re: Cannot use SR-IOV feature of Intel 82576 network card

2012-01-13 Thread nutznboltz
I'm seeing "not enough MMIO resources for SR-IOV" when I use "max_vfs=7" on: $ uname -srvm Linux 3.2.0-8-generic #15-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jan 11 13:57:44 UTC 2012 x86_64 $ lsb_release -ds Ubuntu precise (development branch) $ lspci -nn | grep Eth 03:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 8

[Bug 896388] Re: restart broken - Regression Caused by LP: #600941

2012-01-04 Thread nutznboltz
I'm back, feel free to ask for non-developer QA testing from me. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/896388 Title: restart broken - Regression Caused by LP: #600941 To manage noti

[Bug 563895] Re: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists

2011-12-08 Thread nutznboltz
I will be on vacation through Jan 5, 2012. Please do not ask for testing until after that date, thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895 Title: grub2 fails to boot or install wh

[Bug 896388] Re: restart broken - Regression Caused by LP: #600941

2011-12-08 Thread nutznboltz
I will be on vacation through Jan 5, 2012. Please do not ask for testing until after that date, thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/896388 Title: restart broken - Regression Caused

[Bug 896388] Re: Fix Regression Caused by LP: #600941

2011-11-25 Thread nutznboltz
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1886725 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/896388 Title: Fix Regression Caused by LP: #600941 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https

[Bug 896388] Re: Fix Regression Caused by LP: #600941

2011-11-25 Thread nutznboltz
I'm OK with just using my PPA for now and letting the rest of the world stay broken. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/896388 Title: Fix Regression Caused by LP: #600941 To manage notif

[Bug 600941] Re: stop doesn't stop only the host's process on LXC szerver

2011-11-25 Thread nutznboltz
See LP: #896388 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600941 Title: stop doesn't stop only the host's process on LXC szerver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launc

[Bug 896388] Re: Fix Regression Caused by LP: #600941

2011-11-25 Thread nutznboltz
ch- to-fix-all-the-damage-that-lp-600941-causes + See also + + https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/nrpe-unbreak-lp-600941 + ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: nagios-nrpe-server (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-1.3-generic 3.2.0-rc2 Uname: L

[Bug 896388] [NEW] Fix Regression Caused by LP: #600941

2011-11-25 Thread nutznboltz
therefore slow nrpe response times. The fix is to add --retry 10 or such to the invocation of start-stop- daemon ... --stop ... Patch forthcoming, see http://askubuntu.com/questions/82631/what-is-the-way-to-submit-a-patch- to-fix-all-the-damage-that-lp-600941-causes See also https://launc

[Bug 692691] Re: update-grub thinks my kernel is a xen one

2011-11-25 Thread nutznboltz
Thank you very much for this nifty fix. I pushed it out to 38 systems that use grub1 today. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692691 Title: update-grub thinks my kernel is a xen one To

[Bug 600941] Re: stop doesn't stop only the host's process on LXC szerver

2011-11-25 Thread nutznboltz
http://askubuntu.com/questions/82631/what-is-the-way-to-submit-a-patch- to-fix-all-the-damage-that-lp-600941-causes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600941 Title: stop doesn't stop only

[Bug 600941] Re: stop doesn't stop only the host's process on LXC szerver

2011-11-23 Thread nutznboltz
$ grep -i sometimes /etc/init.d/nagios-nrpe-server #sometimes deleting the pidfile fails. cleanup afterwards. That got past QA? It looks like a red flag to me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 600941] Re: stop doesn't stop only the host's process on LXC szerver

2011-11-23 Thread nutznboltz
epairing this is why I am doing this work. I have been working on remediating the fix. You can see my current work in this PPA. https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/nrpe-unbreak-lp-600941 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 692691] Re: update-grub thinks my kernel is a xen one

2011-11-17 Thread nutznboltz
Oh, I just found this: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692691 Title: update-grub thinks my kernel is a xen one To manage notif

[Bug 692691] Re: update-grub thinks my kernel is a xen one

2011-11-17 Thread nutznboltz
Thanks Clint. Are there plans to improve this section? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Verification I especially find it difficult to know if something is being expected of the bug reporter (or subscribers) or not. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Bug 604335] Re: grub-pc.postinst script fails to detect virtio vda disk in KVM guest

2011-11-17 Thread nutznboltz
http://askubuntu.com/questions/80224/does-grub2-require-an-optional- scsi-feature -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604335 Title: grub-pc.postinst script fails to detect virtio vda disk

[Bug 692691] Re: update-grub thinks my kernel is a xen one

2011-11-17 Thread nutznboltz
Repeated verification on VM guest with only 2.6.32 kernel with the same results. $ uname -svrm Linux 2.6.32-35-server #78-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 11 16:26:12 UTC 2011 x86_64 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Bug 692691] Re: update-grub thinks my kernel is a xen one

2011-11-17 Thread nutznboltz
Verified on Lucid $ lsb_release -ds Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS $ uname -svrm Linux 2.6.38-12-server #51~lucid1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Sep 29 20:09:53 UTC 2011 x86_64 $ grep QEM /proc/cpuinfo model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.14.0 $ df -h / | tail -n 1 | awk '{ print $1 }' /dev/vda2 $ sudo apt-get pur

[Bug 692691] Re: update-grub thinks my kernel is a xen one

2011-11-16 Thread nutznboltz
Adding this link for my convenience https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/grub/0.97-29ubuntu60.10.04.2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692691 Title: update-grub thinks my kernel i

[Bug 350936] Re: Should shut down domains on system shutdown

2011-11-16 Thread nutznboltz
clint-fewbar, Thanks, I'll keep that in mind. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350936 Title: Should shut down domains on system shutdown To manage notifications about this bug go to: h

[Bug 350936] Re: Should shut down domains on system shutdown

2011-11-16 Thread nutznboltz
In comment #104 Serge wrote that he did the verification on Maverick. Based on that I'll update the tags. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done-maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. h

[Bug 692691] Re: update-grub thinks my kernel is a xen one

2011-11-16 Thread nutznboltz
@vorlon please read: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1873424 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692691 Title: update-grub thinks my kernel is a xen one To manage notifications

[Bug 888069] Re: SRU Request for LP: #563895

2011-11-15 Thread nutznboltz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 563895 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895 Colin ACKed LP: #563895 so I'm closing this one as a dup of that one. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 563895 grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists -- You received this

[Bug 563895] Re: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists

2011-11-14 Thread nutznboltz
http://askubuntu.com/questions/79347/what-is-the-policy-for-updating- grub-pc-in-lts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895 Title: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot e

[Bug 350936] Re: Should shut down domains on system shutdown

2011-11-14 Thread nutznboltz
Verified on natty-proposed. $ dpkg -l | grep libvirt | awk '{print $2 " " $3}' libvirt-bin 0.8.8-1ubuntu6.6 libvirt0 0.8.8-1ubuntu6.6 python-libvirt 0.8.8-1ubuntu6.6 $ lsb_release -ds Ubuntu 11.04 $ uname -srvi Linux 2.6.38-13-generic #52-Ubuntu SMP Tue Nov 8 16:53:51 UTC 2011 x86_64 $ cat /var/lo

[Bug 350936] Re: Should shut down domains on system shutdown

2011-11-14 Thread nutznboltz
I could test on Natty later today. Adding link to pending SRU page for my convenience http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350936

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-11 Thread nutznboltz
$ uname -srvi Linux 2.6.38-13-generic #52-Ubuntu SMP Tue Nov 8 16:53:51 UTC 2011 x86_64 $ sudo virsh dumpxml opsi-1720 | grep cpu 2 $ sudo virsh start opsi-1720 $ ssh root@opsi-1720 root@opsi-1720's password: Last login: Fri Nov 11 17:30:14 2011 [root@opsi-1720 ~]# lsb_release -a LSB Version:

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-11 Thread nutznboltz
I found a copy on 91.189.92.169 So I added to /etc/hosts this line: 91.189.92.169 archive.ubuntu.com Now I can install it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795717 Title: 32bit rhel

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-11 Thread nutznboltz
@Clint deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-proposed main restricted universe multiverse $ apt-cache search 6.38-13 linux-backports-modules-cw-2.6.39-2.6.38-13-generic - compat-wireless Linux modules for version 2.6.38 on x86/x86_64 linux-backports-modules-cw-2.6.39-2.6.38-13-server - com

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-11 Thread nutznboltz
I also checked in universe $ curl http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/l/linux/ 2> /dev/null | grep 38-12.51 | egrep -v 'diff|dsc' | sed 's/^.*deb">//' | sed 's;.*$;;' | grep image.*generic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-11 Thread nutznboltz
How long does this take to show up? $ curl http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/linux/ 2> /dev/null | grep 38-13.52 | egrep -v 'diff|dsc' | sed 's/^.*deb">//' | sed 's;.*$;;' linux-doc_2.6.38-13.52_all.deb linux-libc-dev_2.6.38-13.52_amd64.deb linux-libc-dev_2.6.38-13.52_i386.deb linux-so

[Bug 563895] Re: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists

2011-11-10 Thread nutznboltz
I applied the patched grub-pc and grub-common packages from my PPA https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/lucid-grub2-skip-lvm-snapshots to an HP DL-165 G5 today. Prior to applying the patches the system was unbootable. One thing that I did have to do was: 1. aptitude purge grub-pc grub

[Bug 888069] Re: SRU Request for LP: #563895

2011-11-10 Thread nutznboltz
Colin, please apply the patch, it's been far too long without it. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888069 Title: SRU Request for LP: #563895 To manage notifications about this

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-09 Thread nutznboltz
** Tags added: patch testcase -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795717 Title: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://

[Bug 888069] Re: SRU Request for LP: #563895

2011-11-09 Thread nutznboltz
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888069 Title: SRU Request for LP: #563895 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/

[Bug 563895] Re: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists

2011-11-09 Thread nutznboltz
No one has responded to my effort to convert this bug report into an SRU request so I did the only thing I know, I opened LP: #888069 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895 Title: grub

[Bug 888069] Re: SRU Request for LP: #563895

2011-11-09 Thread nutznboltz
PPA containing Lucid's grub2 packages plus only this patch: https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/lucid-grub2-skip-lvm-snapshots -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888069 Title:

[Bug 888069] [NEW] SRU Request for LP: #563895

2011-11-09 Thread nutznboltz
Public bug reported: SRU Justification: Impact: When /boot and / are in an LVM VG and a snapshot is made of an LVM LV in that VG the system will not boot and grub can not be modified (updated, reinstalled) until all snapshots are removed. Testcase: Steps to reproduce: 1. Install Ubuntu from eit

[Bug 888069] Re: SRU Request for LP: #563895

2011-11-09 Thread nutznboltz
** Patch added: "grub2_1.98-1ubuntu12.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888069/+attachment/2590732/+files/grub2_1.98-1ubuntu12.1.debdiff ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 563895] Re: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists

2011-11-08 Thread nutznboltz
Confirmed patch from PPA https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/lucid-grub2-skip-lvm-snapshots fixes issue. VM with patch via PPA installed booted despite snapshot: nutz@lp-563895:~$ dpkg -l |grep grub ii grub-common 1.98-1ubuntu12.1~ppa1~lucid1 GRand Unified

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >