** Changed in: libmbim (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: libqmi (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725190
Title:
Please update modemmanager in xenial to the 1.6 series
To manag
This bug was fixed in the package modemmanager - 1.6.4-1ubuntu0.16.04.1
---
modemmanager (1.6.4-1ubuntu0.16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium
* Backport to xenial (LP: #1725190).
* debian/control: bump down debhelper to xenial vesion.
-- Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak Tue, 28 Nov
2017 12
This bug was fixed in the package libqmi - 1.16.2-1ubuntu0.16.04.1
---
libqmi (1.16.2-1ubuntu0.16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium
* Backport to xenial (LP: #1725190).
* debian/control: bump down debhelper to xenial vesion.
-- Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak Tue, 28 Nov
2017 12:55:17 +01
This bug was fixed in the package libmbim - 1.14.0-1ubuntu0.16.04.1
---
libmbim (1.14.0-1ubuntu0.16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium
* Backport to xenial (LP: #1725190).
-- Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak Tue, 28 Nov
2017 13:02:56 +0100
--
You received this bug notification because you a
Looking at the autopkgtest failures - the network-manager s390x seems to
be failing for every package since over a month. It shouldn't be related
to the modemmanager changes. I might hint it in later.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725190
Title:
Please update modemmanager in xenial to the 1.6 series
To manage n
** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial
** Tags added: verification-done-xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725190
Title:
Please update modemmanager in xenial to the 1.6 serie
verified
DW5816
DW5811
on BRM2-DVT2-C1R (201709-25745) with image X90 , BIOS 1.0.0, kernel
4.4.0-100
Both wwan cards works well.
u@u-Latitude-5290:~$ dpkg -l | grep "modem\|libmbim\|libqmi"
ii libmbim-glib4:amd64 1.14.0-1ubuntu0.16.04.1
amd
I have tried the packages in xenial-proposed for two modems:
Sierra HL8548
ZTE MF626
I was able to connect and everything seemed to be working as expected.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Hello Alfonso, or anyone else affected,
Accepted modemmanager into xenial-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/1.6.4-1ubuntu0.16.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pack
Hello Alfonso, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libqmi into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libqmi/1.16.2-1ubuntu0.16.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
h
Hello Alfonso, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libmbim into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmbim/1.14.0-1ubuntu0.16.04.1 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
** Tags removed: risk
** Tags added: sru
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725190
Title:
Please update modemmanager in xenial to the 1.6 series
To manage notifications about this bug g
I have pushed the 3 packages to the xenial UNAPPROVED queue. Now we need
to wait for those to get reviewed by someone from the SRU team. It's a
big SRU so the reviewers might raise some issues during the review
process - let's keep track of any comments from them on this bug.
** Changed in: modemm
** Description changed:
[Impact]
- * the new modemmanager packages bring in DW5816 supporting.
- * These modemmanager packages is needed to support new devices.
+ * the new modemmanager packages bring in DW5816 supporting.
+ * These modemmanager packages is needed to support new devices.
@Lukasz, if it's hard for you to pick one, can you just proceed with
zesty SRU ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725190
Title:
Please update modemmanager in xenial to the 1.6 series
Hi @Łukasz, per #26, zesty version did fix LP: #1693756. If the
difference between SRU zesty version and the backport in LP: #1693756 is
something within two weeks, I think we should proceed to SRU zesty
version.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Ok, this actually looks better. It seems that the overlay was at fault
here indeed. Should we proceed instantly with SRUing the zesty version
(it can take time for it to get processed in the SRU queue), or do we
want to release LP: #1693756 first? Anyway, looking into if we can just
proceed with th
Thanks Robert for testing this! I'm actually re-running the test now
with the overlay disabled. It looks like Bileto's britney by default
uses the stable-phone-overlay which seems to have a slightly modified
Qt5 stack - maybe that's related. Let's see if the run without it will
also fail.
--
You
Hi @Łukasz,
I tried to run the acc test manually, and it didn't show any error.
The environment I used is vagrant + xenial/amd64 image (not fully upgrade all
of the packages) + ppa mentioned in #18 + related packages/tools.
May I have your opinion what could be the differences?
I also did full-up
@Łukasz, Do you think it's easier for us to SRU LP: #1693756, #17 ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725190
Title:
Please update modemmanager in xenial to the 1.6 series
To manage not
@Łukasz, Do you think it's easier for us to SRU: #1693756, #17 ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725190
Title:
Please update modemmanager in xenial to the 1.6 series
To manage notifi
Sadly the test results got wiped out from Bileto for unknown reasons, I
have re-run the tests. They should appear here
https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3054 under the Automated Test
Results.
What about my question about cherry-picking the new modem code to the
xenial version of modemmanager? As
@Łukasz,
per https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-
service/+archive/ubuntu/3054/+packages,
I can't see "no-change rebuild is still failing" per you mentioned in
#24.
Can you share where is the fail log or anything ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
not experienced modemmanager-qt while backporting qmi over mbim for xenial
before. (LP: #1693756)
btw, I also tried just adding zesty ppa in xenial to install
modem-manager/libqmi/libmbim, it also works well with DW5811 and DW5816.
And it seems only one package for modemmanager-qt called "modemm
Hi @Łukasz,
I had tried to pull the modem-manager/libqmi/libmbim of artful, just modify
some version number of dependency packages, and built those packages
successfully. Sorry, I don't remember if I touched anything about
modemmanager-qt and if they work correctly with modemmanager-qt. The back
Ok, so it seems we might need to pull in modemmanager-qt from zesty as
well as the no-change rebuild is still failing. This is starting to turn
into a rather big batch of changes that need to get SRUed - which
doesn't cope well. It's getting more and more risky.
Just out of curiosity - did anyone
On the Bileto silo I noticed that the autopkgtests for modemmanager-qt
have failed, looks like some ABI-check tests are failing. I need to see
if we don't need to re-build modemmanager-qt against the new
modemmanager in the silo as an experiment.
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ * the new
robertliu,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/+bug/1725190/comments/21
, please review and add information if there are some I did not write there.
alextu, looks fine, thank you
@Łukasz
Thanks for backporting. #18 is verified passed in #20 and #21 and the needed
informatio
verified #18 for DW5816 and DW5811 on BRM4-DVT1-C1H it works fine.
Also filled up the description which SRU needed below.
@Robert, please add information for your new cards as well if they also
need these SRU.
[Impact]
* the new modemmanager packages bring in DW5816 supporting.
* These modem
I have tried ModemManager 1.6 series mentioned in comment #18, and
Sierra MC7455, Sierra MC 7430 and Telit HE910D work fine with this
version. The signal strength issue (bug #1735134) is not observed with
this version.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
@sil2100, this backport is to fix the following 2 OEM project issues:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693756 -> to better support Sierra DW5815e
WWAN module
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/+bug/1735134 -> to fix
incorrect signal strength readings (by modemmanager) for Sie
Could you try the packages that I prepared in a Bileto PPA?
https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3054
We will need to update this bug to include SRU information and a good
rationale for why the backport is needed. Could one of you prepare such
a description? [1]
[1] https:
@Lukasz please go for sponsoring the zesty->xenial backport, that is
enough to get support for the original modem OEM enablement needed. The
work in the patches needs some time, so better do this for the moment.
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
The patches do not have to get accepted upstream, the requirement is
that they're available in the latest development series - so for bionic.
So, if for this bug to be fixed the plano patches are required, the steps
should be:
* Uploading the patches to modemmanager bionic
* The patches get bac
** Tags added: risk
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725190
Title:
Please update modemmanager in xenial to the 1.6 series
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.la
@Lukasz, do you mind that we backport zesty package to xenial first ?
Not sure how much time it takes for those Plano patch to get MM
upstream.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725190
T
The main requirement is that those patches need to be first present in
the devel series (so in bionic). I would propose forwarding them
upstream and then actually distro-patching them into the current version
in bionic. We can then easily pull those into zesty and xenial.
--
You received this bug
@Lukasz those are patches for Dell modems (plano project, unbuntu core).
It makes sense to upstream some of them in fact, and that is something I
can try.
But, it would still make sense to backport the zesty packages to xenial,
as that has the support needed for DW5816e (lp #1693756). If you prefe
Patches? Ok, this is something I was not aware of and can potentially be
a problem. Where do those patches come from? I don't see them on the
zesty version of modemmanager, same for the one we have in bionic. SRUs
have rather strict requirements, one of which being that later series
cannot revert f
@Lukasz, I uploaded the backported packages (zesty->xenial) + patches
from the snap in:
https://launchpad.net/~alfonsosanchezbeato/+archive/ubuntu/modem-
manager-backport
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
verified DW5811 and DW5816 on BRM5-DVT1-C2RX with packages from Zesty,
they both work well.
--- a/dpkg-l.log (xenial)
+++ b/dpkg-l.log (install packages from zesty)
-ii libmbim-glib4:amd64 1.12.2-2ubuntu1oem2
amd64Support library
How did the test with the zesty package go? Does it also look good for
your purposes?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725190
Title:
Please update modemmanager in xenial to the 1.6 ser
@Lukasz, per https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports, the
Ubuntu Security Team does not update packages in Backports. I hope we
use something with Security update.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
this requirement was came from LP: #1693756 ,which originally need the
new stuff which be applied after Yakkety , so I believe so does Zesty.
and from LP: #1693756 comment #12, the Yakkety version looks also be maintained
by modem manager maintainer
s ppa : https://launchpad.net/~aleksander-m/+ar
@Lukasz yes, I think that using the version in zesty is perfectly
feasible, I can prepare the packages for that. About using the backports
pocket, I will let YC or Alex comment on that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
I am looking now at the number of changes that are included between the
versions to determine if this is indeed SRUable. Out of curiosity though
- even though I also originally was thinking about backporting 1.6.8,
would using 1.6.4 from zesty instead be also feasible? If we go the SRU-
way, I now
I meant 1.6.8 of course, typo in package numbers.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725190
Title:
Please update modemmanager in xenial to the 1.6 series
To manage notifications about t
@Alfonso, got progress on SRU ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725190
Title:
Please update modemmanager in xenial to the 1.6 series
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
verified the packages in #1 on BRM5-DVT1-C2RX with WWAN DW5811 and
DW5816. Both of these 2 WWAN cards work well.
BIOS: 0.5.1
IMAGE: X82
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725190
Title:
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Alfonso Sanchez-Beato (alfonsosanchezbeato)
** Changed in: oem-priority
Assignee: (unassigned) => Alex Tu (alextu)
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubunt
Packages uploaded to https://launchpad.net/~snappy-hwe-
team/+archive/ubuntu/stacks-overlay and built for xenial. The versions
are the same as for artful, plus additional patches for Dell modems in
the modem-manager source package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Also affects: oem-priority
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: oem-priority
Importance: Undecided => Critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725190
Title:
** Description changed:
We would like to upgrade xenial to 1.6 series so it supports the same
- modems as the modem-manager snap, specifically some new Sierra modems.
- These are the packages that would need to be updated:
+ modems as the modem-manager snap, specifically some new Sierra modems
+
55 matches
Mail list logo