This bug was fixed in the package openvswitch - 2.5.9-0ubuntu0.16.04.2
---
openvswitch (2.5.9-0ubuntu0.16.04.2) xenial-security; urgency=medium
* SECURITY UPDATE: buffer overflow decoding malformed packets in lldp
- debian/patches/CVE-2015-8011.patch: check lengths in lib/lldp/l
Hello Xav, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openvswitch into xenial-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/2.5.9-0ubuntu0.16.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
** Changed in: cloud-archive/mitaka
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737866
Title:
Too many open files when large number of routers on a host
T
I've committed the trusty/mitaka nofiles fix for the upstart unit to the
git repository for OVS.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737866
Title:
Too many open files when large number of
** Tags removed: sts-sru-needed
** Tags added: sts-sru-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737866
Title:
Too many open files when large number of routers on a host
To manage notific
Re the trusty-mitaka failure, from comment in
http://upstart.ubuntu.com/wiki/Stanzas#limit it looks like this should
fix it - https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/PMmQTNQsxZ/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
Note that this is fixed in xenial (mitaka) but not in trusty (mitaka)
because trusty uses upstart.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737866
Title:
Too many open files when large number
I've moved mitaka back to Triaged since this is only fixed so far in the
systemd init file.
** Changed in: cloud-archive/mitaka
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
Failed to verify trusty-proposed/mitaka/main
2.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.1~cloud0 since trusty doesn't use systemd as
default
root@trusty:/tmp/openvswitch-2.5.5# grep -r '1048576' ./debian/
./debian/changelog: * Bump nofiles to 1048576 for ovs daemons (LP: #1737866).
./debian/openvswitch-switch.openvswi
sucessfully to verify xenial-proposed/ocata/main
2.6.3-0ubuntu0.17.04.1~cloud0
root@xenial:~# grep -r '1048576' /lib/systemd/system/openvswitch*
/lib/systemd/system/openvswitch-nonetwork.service:LimitNOFILE=1048576
root@xenial:~# grep -r 'Max open files' /proc/`pidof ovsdb-server`/limits
Max open
This bug was fixed in the package openvswitch - 2.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.1~cloud0
---
openvswitch (2.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.1~cloud0) trusty-mitaka; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive.
.
openvswitch (2.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium
.
This bug was fixed in the package openvswitch - 2.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.1
---
openvswitch (2.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium
* Bump nofiles to 1048576 for ovs daemons (LP: #1737866).
* d/watch: Update for upstream website changes.
* New upstream point release (LP: #178
This bug was fixed in the package openvswitch - 2.8.4-0ubuntu0.17.10.1
---
openvswitch (2.8.4-0ubuntu0.17.10.1) xenial; urgency=medium
.
* Bump nofiles to 1048576 for ovs daemons (LP: #1737866).
* New upstream point release (LP: #1787519):
- d/p/s390x-stp-timeout.patch: Dr
This bug was fixed in the package openvswitch - 2.6.3-0ubuntu0.17.04.1~cloud0
---
openvswitch (2.6.3-0ubuntu0.17.04.1~cloud0) xenial; urgency=medium
.
* Bump nofiles to 1048576 for ovs daemons (LP: #1737866).
* d/watch: Fix watchfile for upstream website changes.
* New upstr
xenial + UCA/ocata-proposed
==
Totals
==
Ran: 94 tests in 585.1451 sec.
- Passed: 88
- Skipped: 6
- Expected Fail: 0
- Unexpected Success: 0
- Failed: 0
Sum of execute time for each test: 892.7394 sec.
$ apt-cache policy openvswitch-switch
openvswitch-switch:
Installed: 2.6.3-0ubun
Regression testing for xenial + UCA/pike-proposed
==
Totals
==
Ran: 94 tests in 362.4202 sec.
- Passed: 89
- Skipped: 5
- Expected Fail: 0
- Unexpected Success: 0
- Failed: 0
Sum of execute time for each test: 432.8592 sec.
$ apt-cache policy openvswitch-switch
openvswitch-switch:
** Changed in: cloud-archive/pike
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737866
Title:
Too many open files when large number of routers on a host
** Changed in: cloud-archive/pike
Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix
** Changed in: cloud-archive/pike
Status: Won't Fix => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173
looks like the upload to pike proposed didn't update this lp but it is
defo there:
openvswitch (2.8.4-0ubuntu0.17.10.1) xenial; urgency=medium
* Bump nofiles to 1048576 for ovs daemons (LP: #1737866).
* New upstream point release (LP: #1787519):
- d/p/s390x-stp-timeout.patch: Dropped, equ
** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial
** Tags added: verification-done-xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737866
Title:
Too many open files when large number of routers on a
I have verified openvswitch-switch=2.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.1, it looks good
to me.
root@16.04:/tmp/ovs/openvswitch-2.5.5$ grep -r '1048576' ./debian/
./debian/changelog: * Bump nofiles to 1048576 for ovs daemons (LP: #1737866).
./debian/openvswitch-switch.openvswitch-nonetwork.service:LimitNOFILE=10
** Tags added: sts-sru-needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737866
Title:
Too many open files when large number of routers on a host
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
Hello Xav, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openvswitch into xenial-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/2.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
> Subscribed field-high because we have an active environment (more?)
that are are affected by this using Xenial/Ocata, and we really need
that SRU released.
Are you aware that systemd supports drop-in overrides for individual
configuration items? So until this SRU is released, you could work
arou
uploaded to xenial for SRU team review
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737866
Title:
Too many open files when large number of routers on a host
To manage notifications about this bug
** Changed in: cloud-archive/pike
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: cloud-archive/ocata
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
As restarts of OVS are service impacting, I was holding off on uploading
this fix until we had point releases for OVS - which we now do.
** Changed in: openvswitch (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Also affects: cloud-archive
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
**
** Changed in: openvswitch (Ubuntu Artful)
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737866
Title:
Too many open files when large number of routers on a host
Subscribed field-high because we have an active environment (more?) that
are are affected by this using Xenial/Ocata, and we really need that SRU
released.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Any update on when we might land an SRU for Xenial?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737866
Title:
Too many open files when large number of routers on a host
To manage notifications a
This bug was fixed in the package openvswitch - 2.8.1-0ubuntu3
---
openvswitch (2.8.1-0ubuntu3) bionic; urgency=medium
* Updates to systemd configuration:
- Move to distinct units for ovsdb-server and ovs-vswitchd.
* Drop obsolete upstart configuration file.
* Bump nofiles t
I've uploaded fixes to bionic; will do SRU's for Xenial->Artful once
that's into the release pocket and the current 2.8.1 ovs stable release
is through.
** Changed in: openvswitch (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Hi, this is affecting a production environment running xenial+ocata.
Could we have an ETA for the systemd config to land Xenial packages?
Thanks much!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173
This needs fixing in the systemd units for ovs; raising packaging tasks.
** Also affects: openvswitch (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: openvswitch (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: openvswitch (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-18.04
**
34 matches
Mail list logo