Jaunty is end-of-life. Expiring this task.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
Title:
ignore_nice_load ign
** Changed in: linux
Importance: Unknown => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
Title:
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
Just checked on my server in karmic, and this does appear to be fixed
there.
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Still not fixed in Jaunty... :/
(Linux Macharia 2.6.28-16-generic #55-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 20 19:48:24 UTC 2009
i686 GNU/Linux)
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
And here's the script.
Just make sure that the ignore_nice_load.patch file is in the PATCH_DIR,
and that the BUILD_DIR has a decent amount of free space. You may also
want to change CONCURRENCY_LEVEL to suit the number of processing cores
you have.
This has not been extensively tested (I used it
Here's the patch...
** Attachment added: "ignore_nice_load.patch"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32073098/ignore_nice_load.patch
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
Gotcha. Thanks, eapache!
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubun
It hasn't made it in yet, thus the "Incomplete" status for the Jaunty
portion of the bug. I'm not holding out much hope.
I am in the middle of writing a script which will automatically patch
whatever kernel you're currently running though. When I'm done I'll post
it here and you should just be abl
Anyone know if this made it in to a kernel package yet or not? I'm still
seeing this behaviour on 2.6.28-15, jaunty/i686.
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
Submitted SRU for Jaunty.
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubu
Any idea on when this'll be pushed out into backports or whatever? I
just got bitten with this bug myself. :)
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Oops. Erm, it does work, my mistake. I forgot to turn ignore_nice_load
back on via /sys/devices
Also, the usplash thing seems to have fixed itself after a few more boot
cycles. No idea what happened there.
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
Yo
hmm.. I built that kernel with the patch mentioned here that said to
have fixed the problem in upstream kernel.
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
The provided kernel does not fix the issue on my machine. BOINC
processes (nice 19) still scale up the cpu frequency. I have double-
checked the package version and rebooted twice.
Additionally, it does something funny to usplash. It no longer shows any
progress, the bar bounces back and forth the
Packages uploaded.
linux-headers-2.6.28-14-generic_2.6.28-14.45~lp368809manjo1_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.28-14_2.6.28-14.45~lp368809manjo1_all.deb
linux-image-2.6.28-14-generic_2.6.28-14.45~lp368809manjo1_amd64.deb
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
I will upload the headers as well...
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:
The given directory only has linux-image-generic and linux-headers-
generic.
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of
linux-headers-2.6.28-14-generic:
linux-headers-2.6.28-14-generic depends on linux-headers-2.6.28-14;
Should I force it, or do you need to provide a linux-headers packag
I'm sorry, I'm very busy right now changing jobs. I'll try and get
around to it this weekend if not before.
It is on my to-do list.
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Waiting on test results from the originator of the bug.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
Can you please test the jaunty kernel in
http://people.ubuntu.com/~manjo/lp368809-jaunty/
and report back here ?
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Manoj Iyer (manjo)
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
Would be nice though to have someone test the latest Karmic kernel just
to confirm it's resolved.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug notification because yo
I'm reassigning this to the kernel. swalker, thanks for the reference
to the patch. I'll leave it to the discretion of the Ubuntu kernel team
if this will qualify for an SRU for Jaunty, but I'll go ahead and open a
Jaunty nomination for their consideration. Against karmic this should
be Fix Rele
** Changed in: linux
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@
** Also affects: linux via
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12310
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I hope so.
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-
karmic.git;a=commit;h=1ca3abdb6a4b87246b00292f048acd344325fd12
[CPUFREQ] Make ignore_nice_load setting of ondemand work as expected.
ondemand micro-accounting of idle time changes broke ignore_nice_load
sysfs setting due to a thinko in the code.
The
** Description changed:
- Binary package hint: cpufreqd
+ Binary package hint: kernel
Up-to-date Jaunty. Intel Q6600, 2.4GHz
When ignore_nice_load is set to 1 on my cpu, nice processes (BOINC,
running at nice 19) still scale up the CPU.
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scalin
I'm not an expert about these things, but wouldn't this be a kernel bug,
rather than cpufreqd?
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ub
Thanks for making things clear.
I have done:
sudo sh -c "echo 1 >
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ondemand/ignore_nice_load"
and can confirm that the boinc processes are run at full frequency on my
amd64x2 (2.2Ghz)
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Rkimber, I find that
http://www.pantz.org/software/cpufreq/usingcpufreqonlinux.html
does a good job of explaining things.
As far as I can tell, there is a value which determines whether or not
nice processes (like BOINC) are allowed to scale the CPU or not. The
default value of this has changed,
I've discovered that the behaviour of the CPU frequency settings has
changed. The monitor applet offers 4 settings: "conservative",
"ondemand", "performance", and "powersave".
Previously, the "ondemand" setting only pushed cpu frequency up to 100%
when I invoked a foreground process, like indexin
Is this the cause of my problem?
I have noticed that since upgrading to Ubuntu 9.04, when running Boinc,
my CPUs are running about 14 degrees C hotter (at about 52C to 56C,
compared with roughly 38C to 43C before). When not running Boinc and
not using other apps, temperatures look much as they di
Sam, that is a good argument for keeping it turned off by default.
However, if I turn it on manually, it ought to keep them scaled down,
because that's what I specifically told it to do.
--
ignore_nice_load ignored in processor scaling
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368809
You received this bug
i guess the argument for the change would be that you can do the same
work in less time, and using less power at a higher clock speed. so if
you can do N units per day with the CPU at its lowest speed, then you
could save some power by doing those N units in 6 hours, and letting the
CPU (or even be
35 matches
Mail list logo