I have tested gnash 0.8.8-5 on maverick. Upgrading works. Youtube videos
work (but with high CPU load) compared to not working in 0.8.7-0ubuntu1.
One thing that needs to be checked before the sync: Do we really don't
drop any Ubuntu change? The diff between Ubuntu and Debian is quite
huge.
** Summ
Hi Micah,
hm... I just tried to review it from a sponsors perspective, and found
that there is an ubuntu delta which e.g. adds libgnashagg.so to gnash-
common. Actually only afterwards I realized that you should be able to
upload yourself . Maybe you can clearify the Ubuntu delta little bit
more f
Thanks. Based on that, FFe approved. Leaving at New for sponsor
review.
** Changed in: gnash (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
FFe: Sync gnash 0.8.8-3 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636667
You received this bug notification because you are
I have been using gnash 0.8.8 since it appeared in Debian (I've rebuilt
it on my own Kubuntu 10.10 machine) and I did not notice any regressions
compared to 0.8.7. But I haven't done any more testing thant just the
general use.
--
FFe: Sync gnash 0.8.8-3 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)
@micahg: Ping. I suspect this is something we want, but we really need
some testing done.
--
FFe: Sync gnash 0.8.8-3 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636667
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
Have you performed any testing on this package in Maverick? Does it
build/run well?
Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess.
** Changed in: gnash (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
FFe: Sync gnash 0.8.8-3 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)
https://bugs.launc