Re: [Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-09-11 Thread Arnaud Quette
Dmitry, 2012/9/11 Frederic Bohe <915...@bugs.launchpad.net> > Please see http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut- > upsuser/2012-September/007909.html > please check the above reference pointed by Fred. This is the solution you were waiting for. To Ubuntu packagers fellows: the patch to be

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-09-11 Thread Frederic Bohe
Please see http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut- upsuser/2012-September/007909.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985 Title: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-06-13 Thread Dmitry Andreychuk
Attaching logs for svn3663 + patch ** Attachment added: "usbhid-ups_3663_patch2.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+attachment/3187683/+files/usbhid-ups_3663_patch2.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

Re: [Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-06-11 Thread Arnaud Quette
2012/6/9 Dmitry Andreychuk <915...@bugs.launchpad.net> > I'll test it next week, as soon as i get to the hardware. > great, thanks. cheers, -- Arnaud -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-06-09 Thread Dmitry Andreychuk
I'll test it next week, as soon as i get to the hardware. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985 Title: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS) To manage notifications abou

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-06-08 Thread Arnaud Quette
Dimitry, can you please test the last patch I sent (apc-hid-overflow-2.diff) and report the output? cheers, --- Arnaud ** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Arnaud Quette (aquette) ** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bu

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-05-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985 Ti

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-24 Thread Dmitry Andreychuk
The patch didn't change the output. I took a look at the sources: libusb_get_report() returns libusb_strerror(ret, __func__) which returns 0 for ret == -EOVERFLOW. Then in refresh_report_buffer(): r == 0 and the patch doesn't work. The log message would be incorrect anyway because "r" is not the

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-23 Thread Ubuntu Foundation's Bug Bot
The attachment "apc-hid-overflow.diff" of this bug report has been identified as being a patch. The ubuntu-reviewers team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review the patch. In the event that this is in fact not a patch you can resolve this situation by removing the tag 'patc

Re: [Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-23 Thread Arnaud Quette
2012/1/19 Dmitry Andreychuk <915...@bugs.launchpad.net>: > Attaching logs with power failure for versions 2.6.1-2ubuntu2 and 2.6.3. > Power failures and power returns are marked with "NOTE" in the logs. > > I noticed that UPS.PowerSummary.RemainingCapacity came with input report > only once. The de

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-19 Thread Dmitry Andreychuk
** Attachment added: "usbhid-ups_2.6.3_power_failure.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+attachment/2682553/+files/usbhid-ups_2.6.3_power_failure.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-19 Thread Dmitry Andreychuk
Attaching logs with power failure for versions 2.6.1-2ubuntu2 and 2.6.3. Power failures and power returns are marked with "NOTE" in the logs. I noticed that UPS.PowerSummary.RemainingCapacity came with input report only once. The device didn't send it upon changes for some reason. ** Attachment

Re: [Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-18 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Sergey, cc'ing NUT users list, since others may be interested in the topic (for those, follow the bug link below). 2012/1/16 Dmitry Andreychuk <915...@bugs.launchpad.net>: > Hi Arnaud, > > Thanks for your reply! Attaching output for 2.6.0-1ubuntu3. > > > ** Attachment added: "usbhid-ups_2.6.0-

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-17 Thread Dave Walker
** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985 Title: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS) To manage notifications

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-16 Thread Dmitry Andreychuk
Hi Arnaud, Thanks for your reply! Attaching output for 2.6.0-1ubuntu3. ** Attachment added: "usbhid-ups_2.6.0-1ubuntu3.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+attachment/2676822/+files/usbhid-ups_2.6.0-1ubuntu3.log -- You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-13 Thread Dmitry Andreychuk
** Attachment added: "usbhid-ups.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985/+attachment/2672328/+files/usbhid-ups.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985 Title: u