Excerpts from Deric Sullivan's message of Fri May 13 13:52:58 UTC 2011:
> Martin, thanks for the clarification on how/when the fixed package moves from
> -proposed to -updates.
> But is there anything else needed? I waited 10 days to be safe, and still
> the package is not in -updates. It's als
Serge Hallyn [2011-05-06 15:52 -]:
> The package will be moved to lucid-updates 7 days after this bug
> was marked verification-done.
More precisely, it will be moved to -updates after 7 days of being in
-proposed if it is verified at that time. The 7 days period is for
having a time to catch
Thanks again.
Deric
On 05/06/11 15:52, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> The package will be moved to lucid-updates 7 days after this bug
> was marked verification-done.
>
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.
https:
The package will be moved to lucid-updates 7 days after this bug
was marked verification-done.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448
Title:
The "once" parameter doe
Quoting Deric Sullivan (deric.sulli...@ec.gc.ca):
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to figure out if there is anything else that I'm supposed to
> do to get this fix into lucid-updates.
I don't think so. The fix has not been verified for maverick, but it
has for lucid. And there are no other deltas between
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out if there is anything else that I'm supposed to
do to get this fix into lucid-updates.
When I look at the web page for "Pending Ubuntu stable release updates"
(at "http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html";) I
see, in the lucid section, that qemu
I installed the lucid proposed qemu-kvm package and the bug is fixed.
Thanks,
Deric
On 05/03/11 05:40, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Accepted qemu-kvm into lucid-proposed, the package will build now and be
> available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testin
Great. Thanks.
Deric
On 04/30/11 15:16, Clint Byrum wrote:
> No it was not denied. I've gone ahead and accepted the bug for
> lucid/maverick SRU.
>
> ** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Lucid)
> Importance: Undecided
> Status: New
>
> ** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Maverick)
> I
Hi Serge,
Was the SRU for lucid to fix the "once" bug in qemu-kvm denied?
I've seen an update since you requested the SRU but it doesn't seem to
include the fix for the "once" bug.
Thanks,
Deric
On 02/17/11 20:41, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Deric Sullivan (deric.sulli...@ec.gc.ca):
>
Quoting Deric Sullivan (deric.sulli...@ec.gc.ca):
> Thanks, that fixed the problem. Will that fix make it into "lucid-
> updates"?
Great, thanks for testing. Yes, I'll request the SRU.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
Thanks, that fixed the problem. Will that fix make it into "lucid-
updates"?
Deric
On 02/17/11 18:40, Deric Sullivan wrote:
> Hi Serge,
>
> Thanks for looking into this.
>
> I am using amd64 so I'll try out the fix.
> Using "once" did not work for me even if there wasn't a valid OS
Hi Serge,
Thanks for looking into this.
I am using amd64 so I'll try out the fix.
Using "once" did not work for me even if there wasn't a valid OS on
the hard drive.
I'm OK with an importance of "low", I was using the workaround of
simply stopping the qemu-kvm after the firs
12 matches
Mail list logo
