), but
needs some more wriggle-room to allow people flexibility.
Mark
- Original Message -
From: "Erik van der Poel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Unicode List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Unicode List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December
Much of what Erik discussed below is also in the Unicode 17 presentation
of mine called "International Features of New Netscape 6 Browser", a
paper version of which you will find in the proceedings of IUC 17.
(Section 4.4).
The PP presentation (outline only) is available at:
http://home.nets
Mark Davis wrote:
>
> Let's take an example.
>
> - The page is UTF-8.
> - It contains a mixture of German, dingbats and Hindi text.
> - My locale is de_DE.
>
> From your description, it sounds like Modzilla works as follows:
>
> - The locale maps (I'm guessing) to 8859-1
> - 8859 maps to, say
John H. Jenkins wrote:
> At 3:57 PM -0800 12/6/00, James Kass wrote:
> >A Universal Character Set should not require mark-up/tags.
>
> Au contraire, it's been implicit in the design of Unicode from the
> beginning that markup/tags would be required in certain situations.
>
Because of the 6553
Let's take an example.
- The page is UTF-8.
- It contains a mixture of German, dingbats and
Hindi text.
- My locale is de_DE.
From your description, it sounds like Modzilla
works as follows:
- The locale maps (I'm guessing) to
8859-1
- 8859 maps to, say Helvetica.
- The dingbats and Hin
5 matches
Mail list logo
