Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Gora 0.6.1

Hi Lewis ! Thanks for your efforts preparing this Gora release ! I've performed classic signatures / tarball / build tests so here is my +1 vote ! Regards, 2015-09-07 8:41 GMT+02:00 Mattmann, Chris A (3980) : > +1 from me: > > [dhcp-137-79-206-90:~/tmp/gora-0.6-rc1] mattmann% > $HOME/bin/stage_a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Gora 0.6.1

Hi Damien, Nice work! It's worth saying that the gradle plugin can be pushed once the maven artifacts are available on maven central. I'll deal with that once we close off the VOTE. Thanks Lewis On Monday, September 7, 2015, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > Hi Lewis ! > > Thanks for your efforts pre

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Gora 0.6.1

Thanks for driving the release, Lewis. +0 for me Checksum files look good Signature file looks good LICENCE file looks good NOTICE file looks good Source compiled and pass tests. But looks like in the source artifact after I unzip from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/gora/ I saw extra fil

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Gora 0.6.1

Crap Henry. Your absolutely right. Bugger. These were of course local files I had lying around and have been included!!! Can I remove the files from the artifacts at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/gora/ and simply re-stage them? Thanks for review. Lewis On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 10:33 PM, He

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Gora 0.6.1

I am good with that approach On Monday, September 7, 2015, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Crap Henry. Your absolutely right. Bugger. > These were of course local files I had lying around and have been > included!!! > Can I remove the files from the artifacts at > https

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Gora 0.6.1

Hi Henry, OK, new release artifacts available. These are identical to the last ones but with the offending files replaced and new sigs generated. Do we need to VOTE on these or can we release? Thanks Lewis On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > I am good with that approach > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Gora 0.6.1

We need to VOTE on them, unfortunately, Lewis, Perhaps we could just get the VOTEs up quickly and proceed? New bits = new VOTE is a general rule of thumb ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data S

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Gora 0.6.1

Yep I thought so. No big one. I'll close off and whip one up. Thanks Lewis On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > We need to VOTE on them, unfortunately, Lewis, Perhaps we could > just get the VOTEs up quickly and proceed? > > New bits

[CLOSED] WAS Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Gora 0.6.1

Hi Folks, Further to Henry's review of the RC#1 (thanks Henry for attention to detail), I'm closing this thread off and aborting as we need to re-VOTE on the new artifacts. Thanks Lewis On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > I am ve

[VOTE] Release Apache Gora 0.6.1 RC#2

Hi Folks, I am very happy to get a VOTE out for Apache Gora 0.6.1 Release Candidate #2. We solved 21 issues: http://s.apache.org/l69 Git source tag (79fba16dc9bf0b1660861a233a218bc669173178): *http://s.apache.org/gora-0.6.1 * Staging repo: https://repository.apach

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Gora 0.6.1 RC#2

Is the new artifacts updated already to the dist directory? I still see the patch files in the source zip. - Henry On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: > Hi Folks, > I am very happy to get a VOTE out for Apache Gora 0.6.1 Release Candidate > #2. > > We solved 21 issues: ht