ache stinger, if you really are
>> looking for "interactive".
>>
>> Yong
>>
>> --
>> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:02:32 -0500
>> Subject: Re: Benchmarking Hive Changes
>> From: anth...@mattas.net
>> To: user@ha
of MapReduce, it will be really hard to
> archive an "interactive" result. MapReduce is a batch mode, period.
>
> You do want to consider Impala/spark or Apache stinger, if you really are
> looking for "interactive".
>
> Yong
>
> -------
MapReduce, it will be really hard to
archive an "interactive" result. MapReduce is a batch mode, period.
You do want to consider Impala/spark or Apache stinger, if you really are
looking for "interactive".
Yong
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:02:32 -0500
Subject: Re: Benchmarking Hiv
wrote:
> Are you doing on standalone one box? How large are your test files and how
> long of the jobs of each type took?
>
> Yong
>
> > From: anth...@mattas.net
> > Subject: Benchmarking Hive Changes
> > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 21:31:42 -0500
> > To: user@hadoo
Are you doing on standalone one box? How large are your test files and how long
of the jobs of each type took?
Yong
> From: anth...@mattas.net
> Subject: Benchmarking Hive Changes
> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 21:31:42 -0500
> To: user@hadoop.apache.org
>
> I’ve been trying to ben
I’ve been trying to benchmark some of the Hive enhancements in Hadoop 2.0 using
the HDP Sandbox.
I took one of their example queries and executed it with the tables stored as
TEXTFILE, RCFILE, and ORC. I also tried enabling enabling vectorized execution,
and predicate pushdown.
SELECT s07.des
