Enhanced API now have a set
of tests which they pass.
Niels
> From: pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:13:59 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Enhanced API and HyperRelationships
>
>
> A first stab at implementing the Enhanced API and
: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:04:32 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Enhanced API and HyperRelationships
>
>
> Hi Peter,
> I will start writing test-code first. Some nice creation code will definitely
> be part of that, which I will post on the graph-collections
:48:36 -0700
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Enhanced API and HyperRelationships
>
> That is cool Niels,
> I am looking forward to you testing it out, maybe some else people?
> Also, I would love to see how to query such a structure at the API
> level. Could
the Enhanced
> > API can work as a drop-in replacement.
> > Niels
> >
> >> From: pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
> >> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> >> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:13:59 +0200
> >> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Enhanced API and HyperRelationships
>
;> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
>> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:13:59 +0200
>> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Enhanced API and HyperRelationships
>>
>>
>> A first stab at implementing the Enhanced API and HyperRelationships is
>> finished. It still needs thorough testing, so th
e done, but it
> proves that at least in the case of my own application the Enhanced API can
> work as a drop-in replacement.
> Niels
>
>> From: pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
>> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
>> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:13:59 +0200
>> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] En
ion...@hotmail.com
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:13:59 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Enhanced API and HyperRelationships
>
>
> A first stab at implementing the Enhanced API and HyperRelationships is
> finished. It still needs thorough testing, so this is PRE-
mounts to something similar to having a
> getSingleRelationship method,
> which cannot throw an Exception, because multiple entries with the same
> RelationshipType cannot be created by design.
>
> Niels
> > From: pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
> > To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> >
ngleRelationship
method,
which cannot throw an Exception, because multiple entries with the same
RelationshipType cannot be created by design.
Niels
> From: pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 02:03:54 +0200
> Subject: [Neo4j] Enhanced API and Hype
to traverse to
another Node.
Still work to be done. Creating a couple of good examples is indeed something
on my todo list.
Niels
> From: peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com
> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 06:44:17 -0700
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Enhanced API and HyperR
Nils,
this looks very cool and generic, great job in writing this down! The
main part I have problems to grasp is how to query a data structure of
PropertyContainers that can be arbitrarily reified without being too
generic and loose track of your data structure. Do you imaging any
query mecainism
Today I wrote a piece about the Enhanced API and about HyperRelationships, I
have been working on over the last couple of days.
See: https://github.com/peterneubauer/graph-collections/wiki/Enhanced-API
The API as presented in the graph-collections repo on Git is not feature
complete yet with r
12 matches
Mail list logo
